Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
    • About Us
    • Colophon
    • Survey
  • Reliability.fm
    • Speaking Of Reliability
    • Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
    • Quality during Design
    • CMMSradio
    • Way of the Quality Warrior
    • Critical Talks
    • Asset Performance
    • Dare to Know
    • Maintenance Disrupted
    • Metal Conversations
    • The Leadership Connection
    • Practical Reliability Podcast
    • Reliability Hero
    • Reliability Matters
    • Reliability it Matters
    • Maintenance Mavericks Podcast
    • Women in Maintenance
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • NoMTBF
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • ASQR&R
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Maintenance Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • RCM Blitz®
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Breaking Bad for Reliability
      • Field Reliability Data Analysis
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability by Design
      • Reliability Competence
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
      • Reliability Knowledge
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • The RCA
      • Communicating with FINESSE
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Institute of Quality & Reliability
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Statistical Methods for Failure-Time Data
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Hardware Product Develoment Lifecycle
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Special Offers
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Glossary
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinar Sources
    • Journals
    • Higher Education
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • Your Courses
    • 14 Ways to Acquire Reliability Engineering Knowledge
    • Live Courses
      • Introduction to Reliability Engineering & Accelerated Testings Course Landing Page
      • Advanced Accelerated Testing Course Landing Page
    • Integral Concepts Courses
      • Reliability Analysis Methods Course Landing Page
      • Applied Reliability Analysis Course Landing Page
      • Statistics, Hypothesis Testing, & Regression Modeling Course Landing Page
      • Measurement System Assessment Course Landing Page
      • SPC & Process Capability Course Landing Page
      • Design of Experiments Course Landing Page
    • The Manufacturing Academy Courses
      • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Statistics
      • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
      • Quality Engineering Statistics
      • FMEA in Practice
      • Process Capability Analysis course
      • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
      • Return on Investment online course
    • Industrial Metallurgist Courses
    • FMEA courses Powered by The Luminous Group
      • FMEA Introduction
      • AIAG & VDA FMEA Methodology
    • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction
      • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction Course Landing Page
    • Fault Tree Analysis (FTA)
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • How to be an Online Student
    • Quondam Courses
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Live Events
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home
Home » LMS » Page 28

by Fred Schenkelberg Leave a Comment

V. C. 3. Ongoing Reliability Testing

V. Reliability Testing
C. Product Testing

Describe the purpose, advantages, and limitations of each of the following types of tests, and use common models to develop test plans, evaluate risks, and interpret test results.

3. Ongoing reliability testing (e.g., sequential probability ratio test [SPRT]) (Evaluate)

Checking for the impact of your supply chain or assembly line variability on field reliability, this is one way to go about doing it.

 

  • mp4 V. C. 3. Ongoing Reliability Testing video Download
  • pdf V. C. 3. Ongoing Reliability Testing slides Download
  • mp3 V. C. 3. Ongoing Reliability Testing audio Download

Additional References

Sequential Sampling by Attributes (article)

Quick Quiz

 

View Previous View Next

by Fred Schenkelberg Leave a Comment

V. C. 2. Product Reliability Acceptance Testing – PRAT

V. Reliability Testing
C. Product Testing

Describe the purpose, advantages, and limitations of each of the following types of tests, and use common models to develop test plans, evaluate risks, and interpret test results.

2. Product reliability acceptance testing (PRAT) (Evaluate)

This can be fun, and can be challenging to accomplish.

 

  • mp4 V. C. 2. Product Reliability Acceptance Testing - PRAT video Download
  • pdf V. C. 2. Product Reliability Acceptance Testing - PRAT slides Download
  • mp3 V. C. 2. Product Reliability Acceptance Testing - PRAT audio Download

Additional References

 

Quick Quiz

 

View Previous View Next

by Fred Schenkelberg Leave a Comment

V. C. 1. b. Qualification Demonstration Testing – Success Testing

V. Reliability Testing
C. Product Testing

Describe the purpose, advantages, and limitations of each of the following types of tests, and use common models to develop test plans, evaluate risks, and interpret test results.

1. Qualification/demonstration testing (sequential tests, fixed -length tests) (Evaluate)

In some cases we have to be ecumenical with sample size and the testing is pass/fail in nature. Then success testing is the way to go. Plus, it is a great tool to estimate sample sizes for testing.

 

  • mp4 V. C. 1. b. Qualification Demonstration Testing - Success Testing video Download
  • pdf V. C. 1. b. Qualification Demonstration Testing - Success Testing slides Download
  • mp3 V. C. 1. b. Qualification Demonstration Testing - Success Testing audio Download

Additional References

Sample Size – success testing (article)

Extended Bogey Testing (article)

Quick Quiz

1-134. A unit is designed to achieve 96% reliability at a 90% confidence level. Which of the following is the minimum sample testing results that reflects the requirements?

(A) 200 units to be tested with one failure reported
(B) 100 units to be tested with one failure reported
(C) 50 units to be tested with no failures reported
(D) 25 units to be tested with no failures reported

Answer

(A) 100 units to be tested with one failure reported

Discussion

A quick way to solve this one is with the Beta Table based on the work of Locks. The Beta table entry is with the number of samples, n, and the number of successes, r. So, for (A) with n = 200 and r = 199 (there is one failure) and under the column with Y = 0.90 for the 90% lower confidence bound, we find a value of 0.981 or 98.1%.

Given we’re looking for the minimum testing results – or fewest samples let’s check (B). Here n = 100 and r = 99 with 90% confidence we find 96.2%, which just barely meets our requirement and uses 100 fewer samples.

For (C) we find 95.6% and for (D) find 91.5% both below the target.

 

View Previous View Next

by Fred Schenkelberg Leave a Comment

V. C. 1. a. Qualification Demonstration Testing – PRST

V. Reliability Testing
C. Product Testing

Describe the purpose, advantages, and limitations of each of the following types of tests, and use common models to develop test plans, evaluate risks, and interpret test results.

1. Qualification/demonstration testing (sequential tests, fixed -length tests) (Evaluate)

At times our product expected lifetimes is relatively short and running the product in realtime can be a form of reliability test.

 

  • mp4 V. C. 1. a. Qualification Demonstration Testing - PRST video Download
  • pdf V. C. 1. a. Qualification Demonstration Testing - PRST slides Download
  • mp3 V. C. 1. a. Qualification Demonstration Testing - PRST audio Download

Additional References

Sequential Sampling by Attributes (article)

Quick Quiz

 

View Previous View Next

by Fred Schenkelberg Leave a Comment

Product Testing Introduction

  • mp4 V. C. Product Testing Introduction video Download
  • pdf V. C. Product Testing Introduction slides Download
  • mp3 V. C. Product Testing Introduction audio Download

Additional References

 

Quick Quiz

1-44. You need to verify that the maintainability requirement of a design is being met. What is the most accurate method to do so.

(A) Analyze the design.
(B) Perform maintainability prediction.
(C) Conduct thorough design reviews.
(D) Conduct a demonstration at the customer’s facility.

Answer

(D) Conduct a demonstration at the customer’s facility.

Discussion

Reviews and predictions are common approaches to evaluate a design during the development process. They do not include the end customer’s use environment or fully reflect the (often unknown) customer expectations. The key phrase here is “most accurate”, which means the various methods are all potential methods to verify the meeting of a requirement. In this case, the verification that includes the fewest assumptions or limitations on understanding/applying the customers requirements is the best or most accurate.

View Next

by Fred Schenkelberg Leave a Comment

V. C. Product Testing

View Previous View Next

by Fred Schenkelberg Leave a Comment

V. B. 4. Software Testing

V. Reliability Testing
B. Testing during development

Describe the purpose, advantages, and limitations of each of the following types of tests, and use common models to develop test plans, evaluate risks, and interpret test results.

4. Software testing (e.g., white-box, black-box, operational profile, and fault-injection) (Evaluate)

Software continues to delivery more functionality for even simple systems.

 

  • mp4 V. B. 4. Software Testing video Download
  • pdf V. B. 4. Software Testing slides Download
  • mp3 V. B. 4. Software Testing audio Download

Additional References

 

Quick Quiz

1-54. Identify which models are used for software reliability,

I.   basic execution time model

II.  simulation model

III. Markov analysis model

IV.  logarithmic Poisson execution time model

(A) I and II only
(B) I and IV only
(C) II and III only
(D) I, II, III, and IV

Answer

(B) I and IV only

Discussion

Musa and others have developed a range of software reliability models. Two are the basic execution time model and the logarithmic Poisson execution time model. There are variations of these models using other distributions, yet these two tend to be commonly used along with being easy to use.

Markov analysis is a method to analyze system reliability and availability when strong dependencies exist between elements of the system. These are rarely used specifically for software specifically. Simulation modeling is a technique of emulating a system, while possible to be done with software, it generally wouldn’t be useful nor suitable for reliability modeling.

Musa, John D, Anthony Iannino, and Kazuhira Okumoto. 1987. Software Reliability: Measurement, Prediction, Application. New York: McGraw-Hill. Web.      

View Previous View Next

by Fred Schenkelberg Leave a Comment

V. B. 3. Reliability Growth Testing

V. Reliability Testing
B. Testing during development

Describe the purpose, advantages, and limitations of each of the following types of tests, and use common models to develop test plans, evaluate risks, and interpret test results.

3. Reliability growth testing (e.g., test, analyze, and fix (TAAF), Duane) (Evaluate)

Especially useful for large complex systems, we can track the trajectory of the incremental improvements.

 

  • mp4 V. B. 3. Reliability Growth Testing video Download
  • pdf V. B. 3. Reliability Growth Testing slides Download
  • mp3 V. B. 3. Reliability Growth Testing audio Download

Additional References

SOR 050 Implementing System Reliability Growth (podcast)

9 Reliability Growth Patterns for Two Test Phases (article)

Reliability Growth Testing (article)

Duane Plot of Cumulative Failures Over Time (article)

Quick Quiz

1-136. Identify the important steps in the planning and conduct of a test, analyze, and fix program.

I.   Fully analyze all failures.
II.  Accept some failures as non relevant.
III. Dismiss no failure as random.
IV.  Take corrective action on all failures.

 

(A) I and IV only
(B) II and III only
(C) I, III and IV only
(D) I, II, III, and IV

Answer

(C) I, III and IV only

Discussion

The test, analyze, and fix program relies on finding, understanding and designing out or mitigating as many failures as possible. No failures are irrelevant.

If the unit under test was not setup properly, your customer will likely have setup related failures.

If the test technician drops a unit, it is likely your customer will drop the one they have.

If an engineer doesn’t understand an error message, users of the product will too.

If the device stops working briefly at 65°C in a thermal chamber, the underlying root cause may reflect a design flaw and just take longer to failure at lower temperatures.

 

View Previous View Next

by Fred Schenkelberg Leave a Comment

V. B. 2. Discovery Testing

V. Reliability Testing
B. Testing during development

Describe the purpose, advantages, and limitations of each of the following types of tests, and use common models to develop test plans, evaluate risks, and interpret test results.

2. Discovery testing (e.g., HALT, margin tests, sample size of 1) (Evaluate)

Sometimes we just need to know what will fail in order to improve a design or system.

 

  • mp4 V. B. 2. Discovery Testing video Download
  • pdf V. B. 2. Discovery Testing slides Download
  • mp3 V. B. 2. Discovery Testing audio Download

Additional References

Discovery Testing (article)

Why HALT is a methodology, not equipment (article)

Quick Quiz

 

View Previous View Next

by Fred Schenkelberg Leave a Comment

V. B. Bonus – A Few Models

V. Reliability Testing
B. Testing during development

Describe the purpose, advantages, and limitations of each of the following types of tests, and use common models to develop test plans, evaluate risks, and interpret test results.

1. Accelerated life tests (e.g., single-stress, multiple-stress, sequential stress, step-stress) (Evaluate)

Build, conduct, and interpret accelerated testing takes more knowledge than briefly covered here.

 

  • mp4 V. B. Bonus - A Few Models video Download
  • pdf V. B. Bonus - A Few Models slides Download
  • mp3 V. B. Bonus - A Few Models audio Download

Additional References

SOR 036 Selecting the Correct Acceleration Test Model (podcast)

SOR 035 Introduction to Acceleration Models (podcast)

Norris Landberg solder joint fatigue (article)

Lead Free Solder Accelerated Testing (article)

View Previous View Next

by Fred Schenkelberg Leave a Comment

V. B. 1. Accelerated Life Tests

V. Reliability Testing
B. Testing during development

Describe the purpose, advantages, and limitations of each of the following types of tests, and use common models to develop test plans, evaluate risks, and interpret test results.

1. Accelerated life tests (e.g., single-stress, multiple-stress, sequential stress, step-stress) (Evaluate)

Build, conduct, and interpret accelerated testing takes more knowledge than briefly covered here.

 

  • mp4 V. B. 1. Accelerated Life Tests video Download
  • pdf V. B. 1. Accelerated Life Tests slides Download
  • mp3 V. B. 1. Accelerated Life Tests audio Download

Additional References

Select the Right Accelerated Life Test Approach (recorded webinar)

Accelerated life testing first steps (article)

Life Testing Starting Point (article)

Quick Quiz

1-132. Accelerated cycling is performed on a sample of devices for six months under normal operating conditions. What can be gained by a cycling program?

(A) It can reduce premature failures in use.
(B) It can reduce the constant failure rate probability.
(C) It can ensure acceptable customer quality.
(D) It can discover all failure mechanisms.

Answer

(A) It can reduce premature failures in use.

Discussion

Thermal cycling is a commons stress products experience and if there are early life failures susceptible to thermal cycling stress, they will fall out in the testing. This permits the team to conduct detailed failure analysis and improve the design or assembly process as needed to minimize the specific failures.

Testing at normal operating conditions for 6 months may be the entire expected lifetime of a product, yet more often (and we’re not given any indication of the expected lifetime) product are expected to last long then 6 months. The product will likely experience thermal cycling in normal use and if it experiences one such cycle per day, it is possible to test more cycles per day in thermal chambers, providing an acceleration factor.

Without more details there is little to use to form a clear picture of the benefits of the testing. (C) implies this test will ensure customer quality, which is unlikely accomplished by one test using a single stress factor. (D) has the word “all” which is a key as no single test is able to reveal all failure mechanisms.

(B) is possibly an answer, yet it is addressing constant failure rates and accelerated cycling generally addresses design/assembly type mistakes or longer term wear out or fatigue failure mechanisms which are generally not considered contributors to a constant failure rate.


1-137. An expensive mechanical part needs to be evaluated to determine its adherence to design requirements. Why would accelerated life testing be conducted on such a part?

(A) because test to provide adequate reliability performance information under normal operating conditions would take too long
(B) because the error in the population resulting from part-to-part variation is too large
(C) because the probability density function of the product follows either a lognormal or a Weibull distribution
(D) because the current sample size and the life distribution indicate that wear-out is likely

Answer

(A) because test to provide adequate reliability performance information under normal operating conditions would take too long

Discussion

Accelerated life testing is done to cheat time. To shorten the time it takes to learn about the relationship between stress and time to failure. In some cases, a failure mechanism occurs with the same fundamental pattern at a higher applied stress. If we have or can determine a relationship between stress and time to failure we can effectively shorten the time to failure in a meaningful manner.

 

View Previous View Next

by Fred Schenkelberg Leave a Comment

Testing During Development Introduction

  • mp4 V. B. Testing During Development Introduction video Download
  • pdf V. B. Testing During Development Introduction slides Download
  • mp3 V. B. Testing During Development Introduction audio Download
View Next

by Fred Schenkelberg Leave a Comment

V. B. Testing During Development

View Previous View Next

by Fred Schenkelberg Leave a Comment

V. A. 2. Test Environment

V. Reliability Testing
A. Reliability test planning

2. Test environment (Evaluate)

Evaluate the environment in terms of system location and operational conditions to determine the most appropriate reliability test.

Understanding the where and how of product use permits adopting test conditions that reflect or accelerate use conditions correctly.

 

  • mp4 V. A. 2. Test Environment video Download
  • pdf V. A. 2. Test Environment slides Download
  • mp3 V. A. 2. Test Environment audio Download

Additional References

The Environmental Test Manual (article)

SOR 062 Are Environmental Standards Useful? (podcast)

SOR 059 How to Set Environmental Specifications for Testing (podcast)

SOR 043 Environmental Testing and Reliability (podcast)

Is Environmental Testing Part of Product Reliability? (article)

Create a Meaningful Environmental Test Plan (recorded webinar)

Quick Quiz

1-139. A sample of 25 mechanical parts is subjected to a 5-week stress test in which each part is subjected to a load stress that increases 50% each week. The test results are listed in the table.

Week                     Number of failures

1                                  0

2                                  1

3                                  1

4                                  3

5                                  7

 

You need to determine whether the failures observed reflect actual use failures. What additional information do you need?

(A) the times of the failures
(B) the history of cumulative stress
(C) the geometry of the test setup
(D) the mechanisms of the failures

Answer

(D) the mechanisms of the failures

Discussion

The time to failure and test design information do not provide details concerning the failure mechanisms. Understanding the failure mechanism involved for each failure permits the comparison of the failures to use condition potential failures.

If the testing results in two more failure mechanisms, it makes the analysis more complex, yet both may occur at use conditions just at different rates. Or, a failure mechanism may only occur at a specific or high stress level. For example over small displacements the metal in a solder join is elastic to some degree thus resilient to failure (although may accumulate damage leading to eventual failure.) On the other hand if the displacement is too large the solder will separate due to the high shear stress. If the normal use conditions does not include the application of sufficiently high displacement to shear solder joints, these specific failures are not likely to occur under use conditions.

View Previous View Next

by Fred Schenkelberg Leave a Comment

V. A. 1. b. Reliability Test Strategies – Human Factors Testing

V. Reliability Testing
A. Reliability test planning

1. Reliability test strategies (Create)

Create and apply the appropriate test strategies (e.g., truncation, test-to-failure, degradation) for various product development phases.

In this lesson the focus is on human factors testing.

 

  • mp4 V. A. 1. b. Reliability Test Strategies - Human Factors Testing video Download
  • pdf V. A. 1. b. Reliability Test Strategies - Human Factors Testing slides Download
  • mp3 V. A. 1. b. Reliability Test Strategies - Human Factors Testing audio Download

Additional References

 

Quick Quiz

 

View Previous View Next
  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • …
  • 43
  • Next Page »
[hide_from site_member="1" visible_to="public"] Get Weekly Email Updates
[/hide_from]
The Accendo Reliablity logo of a sun face in circuit

[hide_from visible_to='public']Please login to have full access.

[login-form]
[password-recovery-link text='Lost Password? Click here to have it emailed to you.']

Not already a member? It's free and takes only a moment to create an account with your email only.

Join

Your membership brings you all these free resources:

  • Live, monthly reliability webinars & recordings
  • eBooks: Finding Value and Reliability Maturity
  • How To articles & insights
  • Podcasts & additional information within podcast show notes
  • Podcast suggestion box to send us a question or topic for a future episode
  • Course (some with a fee)
  • Largest reliability events calendar
  • Course on a range of topics - coming soon
  • Master reliability classes - coming soon
  • Basic tutorial articles - coming soon
  • With more in the works just for members

[/hide_from][show_to accesslevel="Free" ]
Thanks for being a member [member_first_name]!
[/show_to]

© 2026 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy

Book the Course with John
  Ask a question or send along a comment. Please login to view and use the contact form.
This site uses cookies to give you a better experience, analyze site traffic, and gain insight to products or offers that may interest you. By continuing, you consent to the use of cookies. Learn how we use cookies, how they work, and how to set your browser preferences by reading our Cookies Policy.