Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
    • About Us
    • Colophon
    • Survey
  • Reliability.fm
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • NoMTBF
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • ASQR&R
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Maintenance Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • RCM Blitz®
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Field Reliability Data Analysis
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability by Design
      • Reliability Competence
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
      • Reliability Knowledge
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Institute of Quality & Reliability
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Statistical Methods for Failure-Time Data
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Glossary
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinar Sources
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • Your Courses
    • Live Courses
      • Introduction to Reliability Engineering & Accelerated Testings Course Landing Page
      • Advanced Accelerated Testing Course Landing Page
    • Integral Concepts Courses
      • Reliability Analysis Methods Course Landing Page
      • Applied Reliability Analysis Course Landing Page
      • Statistics, Hypothesis Testing, & Regression Modeling Course Landing Page
      • Measurement System Assessment Course Landing Page
      • SPC & Process Capability Course Landing Page
      • Design of Experiments Course Landing Page
    • The Manufacturing Academy Courses
      • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Statistics
      • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
      • Quality Engineering Statistics
      • FMEA in Practice
      • Process Capability Analysis course
      • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
      • Return on Investment online course
    • Industrial Metallurgist Courses
    • FMEA courses Powered by The Luminous Group
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • How to be an Online Student
    • Quondam Courses
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home
  • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction Course Landing Page
  • Upcoming Live Events
You are here: Home / Articles / The Plug and Perf Process

by Doug Lehr Leave a Comment

The Plug and Perf Process

The Plug and Perf Process

Multi-stage horizontal wells have been drilled and completed in shale formations in North America for two decades, and now account for nearly 90% of new wells drilled in the U.S. The Plug and Perf process (PnP) is used for completing most of these wells.

Simplified Plug and Perf Schematic

The PnP process inputs are electric line, perforating systems, ballistic setting tools, frac plug with ball, and pressure pumping (frac pumps). The process is to run the perforating guns, setting tool, and frac plug in one trip on electric line into the well. In the horizontal section (“the lateral”), frac pumps assist by “pumping” the tools to the target location. Flow rates are typically 10 barrels per minute (BPM), or 420 GPM. Run-in speeds can reach 400 fpm, or 4 ½ mph. At the target location, pumping stops, and the ballistic setting tool is actuated which sets and releases from the frac plug. The perforating guns are then moved up-hole a short distance and the first of multiple clusters of perforating charges are fired, creating perforation tunnels which connect the casing to the adjacent shale rock. The perforating gun, setting tool, and electric line are then removed from the well. After removal, the ball is pumped with the fracturing fluids to the frac plug. When the ball seats on the frac plug, those fluids are diverted at high rates and pressures into the perforations to fracture the shale, creating pathways for oil or gas to flow to the well.

The PnP process is executed dozens of times in one well with expectations for the highest mechanical reliability. But in many well completions the frac plug, setting tool, frac ball, and power charge are provided by different OEMs. For example, in a 5 ½” 20 ppf casing application, a service company could run a frac plug sourced from one of twelve OEMs, with a frac ball sourced from at least four sources, on a running tool purchased or rented from at least five other OEMs, using a power charge sourced from either of two other OEMs. This means that 480 unique combinations of frac plug, frac ball, setting tool, and power charge are possible for this application. Can a frac plug OEM vet every possible combination for system reliability? No. But each frac plug OEM must establish compatibility and system reliability through the laboratory testing of their frac plugs with preferred setting tools, power charges, and frac balls, and develop recommended combinations.

TRUTH: The system reliability of PnP tools must be established prior to installation.

This is the 1st in a series of five articles on why Frac Plugs fail in Plug and Perf applications.

  1. The Plug and Perf Process
  2. Frac Plug Reliability
  3. Ballistic Setting Tools
  4. The Pump-In Process
  5. Well Tortuosity

Filed Under: Articles, Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications, on Risk & Safety

About Doug Lehr

Doug Lehr is the Founder and Principal of Integris Technology Services LLC. He has over 40 years of experience in the development of downhole tools for oil and gas wells and has built a track record of success in technical management, innovation, and industry leadership.

« Is Making Assumptions Similar to Making Mistakes
Human Factors in Design Error? »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Articles by Doug Lehr, P.E., Founder and Principal, Integris Technology
in the Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications series

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Articles

  • Gremlins today
  • The Power of Vision in Leadership and Organizational Success
  • 3 Types of MTBF Stories
  • ALT: An in Depth Description
  • Project Email Economics

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy