Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
    • About Us
    • Colophon
    • Survey
  • Reliability.fm
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • NoMTBF
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • ASQR&R
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Maintenance Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • RCM Blitz®
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Field Reliability Data Analysis
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability by Design
      • Reliability Competence
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
      • Reliability Knowledge
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Institute of Quality & Reliability
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Statistical Methods for Failure-Time Data
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Glossary
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinar Sources
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • Your Courses
    • Live Courses
      • Introduction to Reliability Engineering & Accelerated Testings Course Landing Page
      • Advanced Accelerated Testing Course Landing Page
    • Integral Concepts Courses
      • Reliability Analysis Methods Course Landing Page
      • Applied Reliability Analysis Course Landing Page
      • Statistics, Hypothesis Testing, & Regression Modeling Course Landing Page
      • Measurement System Assessment Course Landing Page
      • SPC & Process Capability Course Landing Page
      • Design of Experiments Course Landing Page
    • The Manufacturing Academy Courses
      • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Statistics
      • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
      • Quality Engineering Statistics
      • FMEA in Practice
      • Process Capability Analysis course
      • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
      • Return on Investment online course
    • Industrial Metallurgist Courses
    • FMEA courses Powered by The Luminous Group
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • How to be an Online Student
    • Quondam Courses
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home
  • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction Course Landing Page
  • Upcoming Live Events
You are here: Home / Articles / The Pump-in Process

by Doug Lehr Leave a Comment

The Pump-in Process

The Pump-in Process

As stated in The Plug and Perf Process, electric line and frac pump crews coordinate the pump-in process to convey each FP-setting tool-perforating gun “assembly” along the lateral section of the well – perhaps 70 times per well. High mechanical reliability is expected, so the pump-in process must also be reliable. But to achieve this, many process risks must be mitigated. How are some of these risks mitigated?

Frac Plug speed and bypass flowrate; red triangle denotes increasing risk of FP damage

Run-in speed. An OEM specifies a maximum run-in speed for its FP in feet per minute (fpm). During conveyance, this is measured using electric line drum speed. Higher speeds increase the risk of FP damage. This is mitigated through electric line crew competency.

Excessive bypass flow. While dragging along the low side of the casing, a percentage of the pump-in flowrate always bypasses the assembly. But if assembly movement stops, the full flowrate bypasses it. An OEM usually states the bypass flowrate limit for its FP. Exceeding this limit increases the risk of FP damage. Mitigation is achieved through recognition and reaction, and coordination between the pumping crew and electric line crew.

Wellbore debris. Debris such as frac sand and metallic perforating gun remnants increase the risk of FP failure. Accumulations of debris can stop movement of the assembly, leading to excessive bypass flow. If embedded in the FP, debris can prevent it from gripping and/or sealing within the casing. Mitigation is achieved through practices that promote a clean wellbore.

Distressed frac plug. When a FP is moving at 4 ½ mph through the lateral, timely recognition and reaction to a problem is crucial. Once recognized, fast reaction can mitigate against 2nd order risks. However, recognition and reaction risks are primarily a human factors challenge. Mitigation can be achieved through experience, competency, job planning, and coordination.

Successfully pumping a FP assembly to its target location requires mitigation of process risks. These risks can be mitigated only if known. The pump-in process will vary from well to well but can be de-risked in advance using process Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (pFMEA).

TRUTH: Frac plug reliability is highly influenced by pump-in process reliability.

This is the 4th in a series of five articles on why Frac Plugs fail in Plug and Perf applications.

  1. The Plug and Perf Process
  2. Frac Plug Reliability
  3. Ballistic Setting Tools
  4. The Pump-In Process
  5. Well Tortuosity

Filed Under: Articles, Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications, on Risk & Safety

About Doug Lehr

Doug Lehr is the Founder and Principal of Integris Technology Services LLC. He has over 40 years of experience in the development of downhole tools for oil and gas wells and has built a track record of success in technical management, innovation, and industry leadership.

« 5 reasons you need to do reliability allocation (and 1 reason you don’t)
How to Maintain your Most Important Machine »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Articles by Doug Lehr, P.E., Founder and Principal, Integris Technology
in the Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications series

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Articles

  • Gremlins today
  • The Power of Vision in Leadership and Organizational Success
  • 3 Types of MTBF Stories
  • ALT: An in Depth Description
  • Project Email Economics

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy