Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
    • About Us
    • Colophon
    • Survey
  • Reliability.fm
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • NoMTBF
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • ASQR&R
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Maintenance Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • RCM Blitz®
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Field Reliability Data Analysis
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability by Design
      • Reliability Competence
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
      • Reliability Knowledge
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Institute of Quality & Reliability
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Statistical Methods for Failure-Time Data
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Glossary
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinar Sources
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • Your Courses
    • Live Courses
      • Introduction to Reliability Engineering & Accelerated Testings Course Landing Page
      • Advanced Accelerated Testing Course Landing Page
    • Integral Concepts Courses
      • Reliability Analysis Methods Course Landing Page
      • Applied Reliability Analysis Course Landing Page
      • Statistics, Hypothesis Testing, & Regression Modeling Course Landing Page
      • Measurement System Assessment Course Landing Page
      • SPC & Process Capability Course Landing Page
      • Design of Experiments Course Landing Page
    • The Manufacturing Academy Courses
      • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Statistics
      • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
      • Quality Engineering Statistics
      • FMEA in Practice
      • Process Capability Analysis course
      • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
      • Return on Investment online course
    • Industrial Metallurgist Courses
    • FMEA courses Powered by The Luminous Group
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • How to be an Online Student
    • Quondam Courses
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home
  • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction Course Landing Page
  • Upcoming Live Events
You are here: Home / Articles / Safe Work Practice Procedure

by Mike Sondalini Leave a Comment

Safe Work Practice Procedure

Safe Work Practice Procedure

To Embed Safe Work Practices You Write Detailed, Strict Workplace Safety Procedures that Get World Class Job Safety

You must select OHS risk management mitigations appropriate to a job safety hazard using a formal method that delivers safe work practices.

Each task safety control will need to be developed, assessed for suitability, and recorded so it’s clear what the plan is, and how it is to be done.

In the end, there is a practically designed, completely resourced, fully scheduled, and totally sure safe work practice procedure approved for use.

The need to have a designed business system to guarantee occupation health and safety means your workplace safety performance is not an accidental outcome—you must create and use sure ways to guarantee world class safety results for the people in your Company, and those people it impacts. You must design, build and use a safety management system which makes the workplace safe, and then continually safer again.

The most effective safety management systems are those designed to eliminate workplace hazards; second are those designed to prevent and control workplace hazards. Though workplace hazards elimination has the best safety strategy results, prevention and control of workplace hazards is an acceptable first risk management strategy to use.

There is a misunderstanding in occupational health and safety circles that a Safe Work Method Statement (SWMS) is as good as a Safe Work Practice Procedure for high risk work control. In fact, they are so vastly dissimilar in the way they control job risk that they are incomparable. The difference between the two approaches for addressing high risk work makes Safe Work Practice Procedures much more robust and anti-fragile than Safe Work Method Statements.

To develop a Safe Work Method Statement requires an assessment of the risks associated with a work plan. The SWMS lists only milestone job steps and the related methods and equipment used to complete the job. To assist in identifying potential hazards and their risks you make use of resources such as workplace experience and consultation with competent people (e.g. toolbox talks), codes and standards, industry publications (e.g. safety alerts; trade group hazard profiles), etc. Provided there is a written indication in the Safe Work Method Statement of how the job step risks are addressed, then its purpose is suitably achieved. You find companies adopt completed SWMS templates that are reviewed when required for a job. The Safe Work Method Statement templates might have 15 to 20 rows in which to record the job steps. This causes people to record only the key steps in a job. Yet when the complete job is analysed in detail the number of activities to complete the tasks may number several dozen. Each activity can carry a variety of risks. It is quite easy for one job to have several hundred opportunities for errors, illness, and safety incidents.

A Safe Work Practice Procedure takes job safety and risk prevention well beyond the Safe Work Method Statement standard. In documented Safe Work Practices you specifically indicate what practices are only to be used to do the job. Whereas with an SWMS the choice of mitigations for identified risks is left up to the incumbent to select and apply, that choice is removed in a Safe Work Practice Procedure and instead the necessary mitigation is specified in the document. This allows the chosen risk controls to be reviewed and disputed or confirmed by competent others. A Safe Work Practice cannot use a pre-completed template dusted off for use again, as the risk mitigations can only be finalized once every activity in each task of a job is specified how it will be done.

Writing Truly Effective Safe Work Practices for High Risk Work

The development of soundly written Safe Work Practices Procedure is not only about designing the workflow so only safe work methods are used, it also requires removing all unsafe work practices and intentionally creating safe work areas and healthy environments. Whereas a Safe Work Method Statement for a job lists only its milestone work steps, a fully detailed Safe Work Practice Procedure notes every activity and how it is safety done. Following a fully itemized and specified Safe Work Practice not only prevents job risks at the task level, it can also be used to reduce and proactively prevent risks in dozens of potential occupational health and safety (OHS) incidents, like noise exposure, respiratory harm, blood-borne pathogens, chemical use and storage, electric shock, and many other injuries that may result from activities wrongly performed.

Create detailed Safe Work Practices and Safe Work Procedures that address each activity in each task of a job. Unlike a Safe Work Method Statement, where only the job plan needs to be considered, Safe Work Practices includes every action that will be undertaken to complete the job. This makes Safe Work Practice Procedures the preferred work risk prevention solution for high risk jobs when maximum safety under conditions with numerous factors need to be controlled.

Once a Safe Working Practices Procedure is developed you may need workforce education, training, and individual assistance for it to become the established practice.

When you want world class safe work practices to be used, and a healthy working environment maintained on your jobs, ensure that your people use our Safe Work Practices. With a formal safe work procedure, your workers only need follow the instructions and use the inbuilt risk mitigations to deliver the job right-first-time. On your next high risk job make sure it’s better controlled, with fewer errors, healthier, and with least work safety risk than ever before.

All the best to you,

Mike Sondalini
Lifetime Reliability Solutions HQ

Filed Under: Articles, Maintenance Management, on Maintenance Reliability

About Mike Sondalini

In engineering and maintenance since 1974, Mike’s career extends across original equipment manufacturing, beverage processing and packaging, steel fabrication, chemical processing and manufacturing, quality management, project management, enterprise asset management, plant and equipment maintenance, and maintenance training. His specialty is helping companies build highly effective operational risk management processes, develop enterprise asset management systems for ultra-high reliable assets, and instil the precision maintenance skills needed for world class equipment reliability.

« The Reckless, the Wreckless & the Aware
Only at Scheduled On-Condition Tasks »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Headshot of Mike SondaliniArticles by Mike Sondalini
in the Maintenance Management article series

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Posts

  • Gremlins today
  • The Power of Vision in Leadership and Organizational Success
  • 3 Types of MTBF Stories
  • ALT: An in Depth Description
  • Project Email Economics

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy