Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
    • About Us
    • Colophon
    • Survey
  • Reliability.fm
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • NoMTBF
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • ASQR&R
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Maintenance Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • RCM Blitz®
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Field Reliability Data Analysis
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability by Design
      • Reliability Competence
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
      • Reliability Knowledge
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Institute of Quality & Reliability
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Statistical Methods for Failure-Time Data
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Glossary
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinar Sources
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • Your Courses
    • Live Courses
      • Introduction to Reliability Engineering & Accelerated Testings Course Landing Page
      • Advanced Accelerated Testing Course Landing Page
    • Integral Concepts Courses
      • Reliability Analysis Methods Course Landing Page
      • Applied Reliability Analysis Course Landing Page
      • Statistics, Hypothesis Testing, & Regression Modeling Course Landing Page
      • Measurement System Assessment Course Landing Page
      • SPC & Process Capability Course Landing Page
      • Design of Experiments Course Landing Page
    • The Manufacturing Academy Courses
      • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Statistics
      • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
      • Quality Engineering Statistics
      • FMEA in Practice
      • Process Capability Analysis course
      • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
      • Return on Investment online course
    • Industrial Metallurgist Courses
    • FMEA courses Powered by The Luminous Group
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • How to be an Online Student
    • Quondam Courses
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home
  • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction Course Landing Page
  • Upcoming Live Events
You are here: Home / Articles / Physics of Failure Analysis for Roller Bearing Failures 

by Mike Sondalini 1 Comment

Physics of Failure Analysis for Roller Bearing Failures 

Physics of Failure Analysis for Roller Bearing Failures 

 A tutorial explaining the Physics of Failure method applied to regularly failing roller bearings in a dewatering press. After three years of exhaustive efforts to solve the cause of the bearing failures it was decided to test Physics of Failure Analysis with the aim of finding a lasting answer. 

Keywords: Physics of Failure Analysis, (PoFA) Root Cause Analysis (RCA), Root Cause Failure Analysis (RCFA), roller bearing failure investigation 

 Four ‘twin wire’ de-watering presses were used by a company in the paper making industry. Each machine had 8 rolls (4 against 4) running at 15 rpm. They had experienced endless bearing failures during the past four years, with a bearing in one of the machines failing every 3 months. Their worst rate of failure was when vibration analysis identified another failing bearing on three consecutive days. Six weeks previously the three bearings had been installed new. 

Construction of Shaft Roller Bearing Arrangement 

Figure 1 is the bearing arrangement at the roll ends. The bearing was a spherical roller tapered bore bearing 23236 CCK/W33 installed directly on the taper shaft. Old grease from the bearing purged out a pipe fixed on the front cover. Old seal grease purged past the axial V-ring. 

Figure 1 De-watering Press Roller Fixed End Bearing Arrangement 

Figure 2 shows how the roll sets were driven by the wire, with no direct motor drive. Operating temperature ranged 50-70C. The pressing rolls were in a chamber with a vapour extraction system at the top. 

Figure 2 Roller Arrangement 

The upper bearing housing was mounted to the press using two lugs, a left and a right, each with a hole for a retaining pin. The upper housing was unmovable and solidly fixed to a 5 cm thick machine frame by 4 cm pins that went through the lugs and frame and were secured by a collar at the ends. The lower bearing housing also had two lugs for hinged pins. One hinge was fixed to the frame as described above; the other had a hydraulic cylinder mounted to permit adjustment of roller pressure (not too unlike the lugs and pins shown in Figure 3). 

Figure 3 De-watering Press Adjustable Roller Bearing Housing 

Seals were O-rings between each cover and housing; a primary shaft seal 240x270x15 V-ring made of NBR material DIN3760 running over a bush and greased; a secondary axial shaft seal V-ring VA-250 HNBR. 

Bearing Failure History 

The spherical roller bearing design details were as shown in Figure 4. 

Figure 4 23236 CCK/W33 Bearing Details 

When asked to provide information about the bearing failures the comments received were: 

“The history of damage was that all but one failure happened in the bottom rolls—the adjustable rolls. Total failures were 11 in a period of 3 years at different machines: 

  • 6 failures on different machines at the drive side (fixed bearing): 3 failures @ roll number 3, 1 failure @ roll 1, 1 failure @ roll 2, 1 @ roll 4 
  • 4 failures on different machines at non-drive side (floating bearing): 3 failures @ roll number 3, 1 failure @ roll 4.” 
  • 1 failure at non-drive side upper rolls 

“The history of the failures shows that 80% of the damage is on one side of the outer ring, 20% of the bearings are damaged on the other side, which indicates an axial load (but the 4 press roll sets are driven by the wire, no direct driving motor.). The rolling elements always have minor damage—black spots and raceway contact damage, as shown in Figure 5.” 

“The bearing has normal clearance, replacement bearings are always like the old one—same supplier and same model number.” 

“The failures are happening to many rolls in different positions on the presses. If it was a shaft dimension problem it would limited to a shaft and not the random distribution of failures we have suffered for the past four years. Even with brand new housings, rolls and bearings, the failures continue to occur randomly—we do not know which roll will next fail!” 

“Failures are detected by vibration measurement. When stripped the grease inside is black and smells bad. In the past we found that some automatic greasing modules / lines were not functioning. Since then the greasing system was checked and repaired; but we are still getting failures. The grease still is black and smells.” 

“We changed grease to a better quality— resistant to water and load—but it did not help, we still had bearing failures. The bearing failure on inspection is deep fatigue spalling and cracking; small pieces separate from the outer ring, then cage destruction, and finally total failure.” 

“From our early detection of bearing failure we noticed black spots (hydrogen attack) due, we thought, to aggressive environment (water and vapour) which made the surface very brittle and lead to cracking. There was something interesting that we found based on early failure detection: the bearing fails first then the grease fails later. We found black spots on the raceways but the grease was still in good condition. Maybe the vapour inside the bearing condenses to water after shutdown (for example, if we shut-down for a week).” 

“Today I found the third defective bearing; this is the worst measuring cycle I have ever had. Maybe it will help you to know that two bearings have outer raceways defects and one bearing has an inner ring defect and a small defect on the outer raceway. (Most of the failures we have are on the outer race, the inner race usually has smaller spall.) Six weeks ago they were in good condition (no vibration signs), after detection they will not live more than 2 weeks! 

The bearing is installed in the taper by hydraulic nut. The nut is turned on the thread of the shaft until it touches the bearing. A dial indicator tip touches the inner ring (axial direction); pumping oil the inner ring is pushed to the desired distance, as indicated by the dial gauge.” 

Physics of Failure Analysis 

From the history of bearing failure events the evidence indicates: 

  • 10 out of 11 bearing failures were on the bottom rolls 
  • A common failure mechanism because the same failure mode was found in all failures 
  • Bearings always have black spots (hydrogen attack) 
  • The black spot appears while the grease is still in good condition 
  • Failure mode is spalling of outer raceway (80% one side of raceway, 20% the other side) 

We look for common events and situations that happen to all bearings. These include: 

  • the process material, 
  • chemicals in the process stream, 
  • wash water, 
  • design of bearing, 
  • bearing materials-of-construction, 
  • bearing clearance, 
  • shaft design, 
  • shaft manufacture, 
  • shaft taper shape, 
  • housing design, 
  • housing installation 
  • shaft positioning system 
  • shaft seal material, 
  • bearing seal material, 
  • seal design, 
  • bearing installation and mounting, 
  • purchase of replacement bearings, 
  • storage of replacement bearings, 
  • building vibration, 
  • Equipment support and hold-down, 
  • grease type, 
  • grease supply, and so on. 

Table 1 lists a range of PoF factors considered relevant to the situation. The list was developed from a table containing many more factors by removing those not judged to apply to the situation. For example, all manufacturing and electrical events were removed, since manufacturing errors and electrical discharges were not thought to be a cause of the bearing failure mode experienced. Many events noted in the table will not be a cause of the failures. But we still list them because at this stage we are not certain that they do not contribute to the bearing failures. Each of the issues listed are investigated in detail. If the reason has not been found after testing those failure causes believed to apply to these events, then the removed items can be included back into the investigation to be reconsidered. 

Table 1 Physics of Failure Analysis Bearing Failure Causes 

The list still contains many factors that may be involved in the failure mechanism. Using the known facts we start to group those causes that that relate to each fact. 

Black spot is known to be caused by the presence of hydrogen. One example is hydrogen embrittlement, where hydrogen builds up around the grain boundaries of the microstructure. Research of articles on the Internet indicated that it is related to the presence of high pressure and/or high temperature. In steels it occurs in those with high tensile strength properties. To have hydrogen attack hydrogen must be present. This can come from the steel itself, or it is in present in the local environment through suitable chemical reactions. Table 2 was developed from the list of PoF causes that are failure mechanisms related to black spot attack. 

Table 2 Bearing Failure Mechanisms 

We have reduced the bearing failure scenario down to two potential situations—high stress and hydrogen generating chemical reaction. Each of these is to be closely investigated before looking at other possible failure mechanisms. The question now becomes: What can occur to a roller bearing to create the two situations identified? Table 3 lists possible situational causes and how they can be tested. Figure 6 shows the type of problems that need to be checked. 

Figure 6 Possible Causes of Bearing Failures 
Table 3 Potential Situational causes of Bearing Failure and Checks to Undertake 

My best regards to you, 

Mike Sondalini

Filed Under: Articles, Life Cycle Asset Management, on Maintenance Reliability

About Mike Sondalini

In engineering and maintenance since 1974, Mike’s career extends across original equipment manufacturing, beverage processing and packaging, steel fabrication, chemical processing and manufacturing, quality management, project management, enterprise asset management, plant and equipment maintenance, and maintenance training. His specialty is helping companies build highly effective operational risk management processes, develop enterprise asset management systems for ultra-high reliable assets, and instil the precision maintenance skills needed for world class equipment reliability.

« Exemplary Maintenance Leadership
Future of Quality »

Comments

  1. Yousuf says

    November 17, 2023 at 1:11 PM

    Thanks Mike for sharing. Enjoyed the article.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Headshot of Mike SondaliniArticles by Mike Sondalini
in the Life Cycle Asset Management article series

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Posts

  • Gremlins today
  • The Power of Vision in Leadership and Organizational Success
  • 3 Types of MTBF Stories
  • ALT: An in Depth Description
  • Project Email Economics

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy