Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
    • About Us
    • Colophon
    • Survey
  • Reliability.fm
    • Speaking Of Reliability
    • Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
    • Quality during Design
    • CMMSradio
    • Way of the Quality Warrior
    • Critical Talks
    • Asset Performance
    • Dare to Know
    • Maintenance Disrupted
    • Metal Conversations
    • The Leadership Connection
    • Practical Reliability Podcast
    • Reliability Hero
    • Reliability Matters
    • Reliability it Matters
    • Maintenance Mavericks Podcast
    • Women in Maintenance
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • NoMTBF
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • ASQR&R
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Maintenance Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • RCM Blitz®
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Breaking Bad for Reliability
      • Field Reliability Data Analysis
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability by Design
      • Reliability Competence
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
      • Reliability Knowledge
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • The RCA
      • Communicating with FINESSE
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Institute of Quality & Reliability
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Statistical Methods for Failure-Time Data
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Hardware Product Develoment Lifecycle
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Special Offers
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Glossary
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinar Sources
    • Journals
    • Higher Education
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • Your Courses
    • 14 Ways to Acquire Reliability Engineering Knowledge
    • Live Courses
      • Introduction to Reliability Engineering & Accelerated Testings Course Landing Page
      • Advanced Accelerated Testing Course Landing Page
    • Integral Concepts Courses
      • Reliability Analysis Methods Course Landing Page
      • Applied Reliability Analysis Course Landing Page
      • Statistics, Hypothesis Testing, & Regression Modeling Course Landing Page
      • Measurement System Assessment Course Landing Page
      • SPC & Process Capability Course Landing Page
      • Design of Experiments Course Landing Page
    • The Manufacturing Academy Courses
      • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Statistics
      • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
      • Quality Engineering Statistics
      • FMEA in Practice
      • Process Capability Analysis course
      • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
      • Return on Investment online course
    • Industrial Metallurgist Courses
    • FMEA courses Powered by The Luminous Group
      • FMEA Introduction
      • AIAG & VDA FMEA Methodology
    • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction
      • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction Course Landing Page
    • Fault Tree Analysis (FTA)
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • How to be an Online Student
    • Quondam Courses
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Live Events
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home
Home » LMS » Page 33

by Fred Schenkelberg Leave a Comment

Reliability in Design and Development Introduction

  • mp4 Reliability in Design and Development Introduction video Download
  • pdf Reliability in Design and Development Introduction slides Download
  • mp3 Reliability in Design and Development Introduction audio Download

by Fred Schenkelberg Leave a Comment

III. Reliability in Design and Development

View Previous View Next

by Fred Schenkelberg Leave a Comment

II. B. 3. d. Hypothesis Testing – Comparisons

II. Probability and Statistics for Reliability
B. Statistical inference

3. Hypothesis testing (parametric and non-parametric) (Evaluate)

Apply hypothesis testing for parameters such as means, variance, proportions, and distribution parameters. Interpret significance levels and Type I and Type II errors for accepting/rejecting the null hypothesis.

A good use of hypothesis testing is to make comparisons.

 

  • mp4 II. B. 3. d. Hypothesis Testing - Comparisons video Download
  • pdf II. B. 3. d. Hypothesis Testing - Comparisons slides Download
  • mp3 II. B. 3. d. Hypothesis Testing - Comparisons audio Download

Additional References

Equal Variance Hypothesis (article)

Hypothesis un-equal variance (article)

Paired-Comparison Hypothesis Tests (article)

Two Proportions Hypothesis Testing (article)

Two samples variance hypothesis test (article)

Quick Quiz

 

View Previous View Next

by Fred Schenkelberg 4 Comments

II. B. 3. c. Hypothesis Testing – Variance

II. Probability and Statistics for Reliability
B. Statistical inference

3. Hypothesis testing (parametric and non-parametric) (Evaluate)

Apply hypothesis testing for parameters such as means, variance, proportions, and distribution parameters. Interpret significance levels and Type I and Type II errors for accepting/rejecting the null hypothesis.

The testing of measures of dispersion is as simple as comparing means.

 

  • mp4 II. B. 3. c. Hypothesis Testing - Variance video Download
  • pdf II. B. 3. c. Hypothesis Testing - Variance slides Download
  • mp3 II. B. 3. c. Hypothesis Testing - Variance audio Download

Additional References

Hypothesis Tests for Variance Case I (article)

Hypothesis Tests for Variance Case II (article)

Quick Quiz

 

View Previous View Next

by Fred Schenkelberg Leave a Comment

II. B. 3. b. Hypothesis Testing – Means

II. Probability and Statistics for Reliability
B. Statistical inference

3. Hypothesis testing (parametric and non-parametric) (Evaluate)

Apply hypothesis testing for parameters such as means, variance, proportions, and distribution parameters. Interpret significance levels and Type I and Type II errors for accepting/rejecting the null hypothesis.

The first and simplest of hypothesis tests is with a mean compared to a specification or standard.

 

  • mp4 II. B. 3. b. Hypothesis Testing - Means video Download
  • pdf II. B. 3. b. Hypothesis Testing - Means slides Download
  • mp3 II. B. 3. b. Hypothesis Testing - Means audio Download

Additional References

Hypothesis Testing (article)

Hypothesis Tests for Proportion (article)

Degradation Hypothesis (article)

Quick Quiz

1-34. To compare sample means, which statistical distribution should be used?

(A) chi-square
(B) exponential
(C) normal
(D) t test

Answer

(D) t test

Discussion

The key phrase here is “sample means”, thus the t-test is the best of the options. While the t-test is primarily for use with small samples —less then 30— drawn from normal populations it is fairly robust to non-normal populations for the comparison of means.

The exponential distribution is not used for the comparison of means using hypothesis testing. The normal or z-test is used to compare the population (not sample) means. The chi-square distribution is used to compare population variances or to compare the observed and expected frequencies of test outcome.

View Previous View Next

by Fred Schenkelberg Leave a Comment

II. B. 3. a. Hypothesis Testing – The Process

II. Probability and Statistics for Reliability
B. Statistical inference

3. Hypothesis testing (parametric and non-parametric) (Evaluate)

Apply hypothesis testing for parameters such as means, variance, proportions, and distribution parameters. Interpret significance levels and Type I and Type II errors for accepting/rejecting the null hypothesis.

Here is a simple process to use when comparing a datasets to a standard or another dataset.

 

  • mp4 II. B. 3. a. Hypothesis Testing - The Process video Download
  • pdf II. B. 3. a. Hypothesis Testing - The Process slides Download
  • mp3 II. B. 3. a. Hypothesis Testing - The Process audio Download

Additional References

Hypothesis Testing (article)

Run Test for Randomness (article)

Hypothesis Test Selection (article)

Hypothesis Test Selection Flowchart (article)

Hypothesis Test Sample Size (article)

Quick Quiz

1-26. The level of significance is defined as the probability of which of the following?

(A) accepting a null hypothesis when it is true
(B) not accepting a null hypothesis when it is true
(C) rejecting a null hypothesis when it is true
(D) not rejecting a null hypothesis when it is true

Answer

(C) rejecting a null hypothesis when it is true 

Discussion

The null hypothesis is rejected if the p-value is less than the significance or α level. The α level is the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis given that it is true (type I error).

The null hypothesis is a statement about a belief. We may doubt that the null hypothesis is true, which might be why we are “testing” it. The alternative hypothesis might, in fact, be what we believe to be true. The test procedure is constructed so that the risk of rejecting the null hypothesis, when it is in fact true, is small. This risk, α is often referred to as the significance level of the test. By having a test with a small value of α, we feel that we have actually “proved” something when we reject the null hypothesis. (NIST Engineering Statistical Handbook)


1-37. Which term is commonly used as the probability of rejecting material produced at an unacceptable quality level?

(A) α
(B) β
(C) 1 − α
(D) 1 − β

Answer

(D) 1 − β

Discussion

β is the probability of accepting the lot or batch when we shouldn’t. It is the chance of a false acceptance given the sample data when the population would not be acceptable. Therefore the meaning of 1 − β is the probability of rejecting (properly so) an unacceptable lot of material. The sample indicates the population is bad and it is bad.

1 − β is also known as the power of the test which means the ability to sample to detect a unacceptable population. β is also called the Type II error or consumer’s risk. In contract, α is the Type I error or producer’s risk.

 

View Previous View Next

by Fred Schenkelberg 4 Comments

II. B. 2. b. Statistical Intervals – MTBF Estimates

II. Probability and Statistics for Reliability
B. Statistical inference

2. Statistical interval estimates (Evaluate)

Compute confidence intervals, tolerance intervals, etc., and draw conclusions from the results.

The common metric, MTBF, has confidence intervals.

 

  • mp4 II. B. 2. b. Statistical Intervals - MTBF Estimates video Download
  • pdf II. B. 2. b. Statistical Intervals - MTBF Estimates slides Download
  • mp3 II. B. 2. b. Statistical Intervals - MTBF Estimates audio Download

Additional References

Confidence Intervals for MTBF (article)

Perils of MTBF (NoMTBF.com article)

Quick Quiz

1-21. A randomly failing component is tested to X failures and a total of N observations are made. How many degrees of freedom are used in calculating confidence limits on the mean?

(A) 2X + 2
(B) 2X
(C) N
(D) N − 1

Answer

(B) 2X

Discussion

There are a few clues in the question that help narrow down the problem to the correct formula to examine. First, “randomly” implies the exponential distribution. The testing terminated when it reached “X failures” suggesting a failure terminated test design. It calls× for the calculation of the “mean” “confidence interval”.

MTBF is the mean of the exponential distribution and the lower one-sided confidence interval is

$$ \frac{2T}{\chi _{\left( \alpha ,\text{ }2r \right)}^{2}}\le \theta $$

where 2r (or in terms of this problem 2X) is the degrees of freedom. 

 

View Previous View Next

by Fred Schenkelberg 4 Comments

II. B. 2. a. Statistical Intervals – Point Estimates

II. Probability and Statistics for Reliability
B. Statistical inference

2. Statistical interval estimates (Evaluate)

Compute confidence intervals, tolerance intervals, etc., and draw conclusions from the results.

When using a sample to estimate a parameter, we can calculate where the true (unknown) value may reside.

 

  • mp4 II. B. 2. a. Statistical Intervals - Point Estimates video Download
  • pdf II. B. 2. a. Statistical Intervals - Point Estimates slides Download
  • mp3 II. B. 2. a. Statistical Intervals - Point Estimates audio Download

Additional References

Point and Interval Estimates (article)

Confidence Interval for a Proportion – Normal Approximation (article)

Confidence Interval for Variance (article)

Statistical Confidence (article)

Quick Quiz

1-39. Identify which of the following statements concerning statistical inference is false.

(A) The confidence interval is a range of values that may include the true value of a population parameter.
(B) The confidence interval normally encompasses the statistical tolerance limits of the population parameter.
(C) Estimation is the process of analyzing a sample result to predict the value of the population parameter.
(D) The point estimate is a single value used to estimate the population parameter.

Answer

(B) The confidence interval normally encompasses the statistical tolerance limits of the population parameter.

Discussion

Confidence intervals apply to the limits of the statistical parameter being estimated such as the mean or variance. Tolerance intervals provide a set of limits for the future individual values, not the mean or variance. Tolerance intervals do not apply to estimates of population parameters.


1-42. What sort of mathematical models are used for statistical inference?

(A) exponential
(B) inferential
(C) deterministic
(D) probabilistic

Answer

(D) probabilistic

Discussion

We are dealing with variation and using a sample to estimate parameters for a population. We base our ability to estimate confidence intervals and hypothesis testing on the tenets of probability.

 

View Previous View Next

by Fred Schenkelberg Leave a Comment

II. B. 1. Point Estimates of Parameters

II. Probability and Statistics for Reliability
B. Statistical inference

1. Point estimates of parameters (Evaluate)

Obtain point estimates of model parameters using probability plots, maximum likelihood methods, etc. Analyze the efficiency and bias of the estimators.

 

  • mp4 II. B. 1. Point Estimates of Parameters video Download
  • pdf II. B. 1. Point Estimates of Parameters slides Download
  • mp3 II. B. 1. Point Estimates of Parameters audio Download

Additional References

 

Quick Quiz

1-17. In a life test of 4 power cells, failures were observed after 12, 22, 30, and 37 hours. A fifth cell was tested for 75 hours without failure, at which time the test was terminated. Calculate the estimated mean time to failure and the failure rate.

(A) MTTF = 35.2; failure rate = 0.0284
(B) MTTF = 44; failure rate = 0.0227
(C) MTTF = 35.2; failure rate = 0.0227
(D) MTTF = 44; failure rate =0.0284

Answer

(B) MTTF = 44; failure rate = 0.0227

Discussion

The formula for MTTF is the total test time divided by the number of failures. In this case add the time to failure times of the four units that failed and the total time for the one unit that did not fail. That is 12 + 22 + 30 + 37 + 75 = 176 hours of total test time. Then divide by the number of failure, 176 / 4 = 44 hours MTTF. The inverse of MTTF is an estimate of the failure rate, 1 / 44 = 0.0227.

The question did not mention the units being replace or quickly repaired after failures, that the test time ends for each unit upon failure. Plus it is looking for the MTTF both of which imply non-repairable units. If you divided by 5 or didn’t check failure rate calculation is correct, there is an answer listed.


1-31. The failure rate for a flash drive is 0.00023 per hour of operation. Calculate the MTBF assuming that the failure rate is constant.

(A) 435 hours
(B) 3125 hours
(C) 4,348 hours
(D) 43,478 hours

Answer

(C) 4,348 hours

Discussion

For the exponential distribution (assuming constant failure rate) the MTBF is the inverse of the failure rate. Thus

$$ \theta =\frac{1}{\lambda }=\frac{1}{0.00023}=4,348\text{ hours}$$ 

 

View Previous View Next

by Fred Schenkelberg Leave a Comment

Statistical Inference Introduction

  • mp4 II. B. Statistical Inference Introduction video Download
  • pdf II. B. Statistical Inference Introduction slides Download
  • mp3 II. B. Statistical Inference Introduction audio Download
View Next

by Fred Schenkelberg Leave a Comment

II. B. Statistical Inference

View Previous View Next

by Fred Schenkelberg Leave a Comment

II. A. 7. j. Pre-Control Charts

II. Probability and Statistics for Reliability
A. Basic concepts

7. Statistical process control (SPC) and process capability (Understand)

Define and describe SPC and process capability studies (Cp, Cpk, etc.), their control charts, and how they are all related to reliability.

An alternative control chart process that is especially useful for line start-up.

 

  • mp4 II. A. 7. j. Pre-Control Charts video Download
  • pdf II. A. 7. j. Pre-Control Charts Download
  • mp3 II. A. 7. j. Pre-Control Charts audio Download

Additional References

Pre-Control Charts (article)

Quick Quiz

 

View Previous View Next

by Fred Schenkelberg Leave a Comment

II. A. 7. i. Capability and Charts

II. Probability and Statistics for Reliability
A. Basic concepts

7. Statistical process control (SPC) and process capability (Understand)

Define and describe SPC and process capability studies (Cp, Cpk, etc.), their control charts, and how they are all related to reliability.

Process capability and control charts are related – and lets talk about how.

 

  • mp4 II. A. 7. i. Capability and Charts video Download
  • pdf II. A. 7. i. Capability and Charts slides Download
  • mp3 II. A. 7. i. Capability and Charts audio Download

Additional References

 

Quick Quiz

 

View Previous View Next

by Fred Schenkelberg Leave a Comment

II. A. 7. h. Standard Normal and z-values

II. Probability and Statistics for Reliability
A. Basic concepts

7. Statistical process control (SPC) and process capability (Understand)

Define and describe SPC and process capability studies (Cp, Cpk, etc.), their control charts, and how they are all related to reliability.

We use the normal distribution and the z-table for many applications here it is useful, too.

 

  • mp4 II. A. 7. h. Standard Normal and z-values video Download
  • pdf II. A. 7. h. Standard Normal and z-values slides Download
  • mp3 II. A. 7. h. Standard Normal and z-values audio Download

Additional References

z value (article)

Reading a Standard Normal Table (article)

How to read a standard normal table (article)

Interpolation within Distribution Tables (article)

Quick Quiz

 

View Previous View Next

by Fred Schenkelberg Leave a Comment

II. A. 7. g. Process Capability

II. Probability and Statistics for Reliability
A. Basic concepts

7. Statistical process control (SPC) and process capability (Understand)

Define and describe SPC and process capability studies (Cp, Cpk, etc.), their control charts, and how they are all related to reliability.

Once a process is stable, the next step is to compare the specification to the variation produced.

 

  • mp4 II. A. 7. g. Process Capability video Download
  • pdf II. A. 7. g. Process Capability slides Download
  • mp3 II. A. 7. g. Process Capability audio Download

Additional References

Process Capability (article)

Supply Chain Process Control and Capability (article)

SOR 013 The Design and the Supplier’s Capability (podcast)

Basic Approach to Achieve Process Stability (article)

Reliability and Statistical Process Control (recorded webinar)

Quick Quiz

 

View Previous View Next
  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • …
  • 43
  • Next Page »
[hide_from site_member="1" visible_to="public"] Get Weekly Email Updates
[/hide_from]
The Accendo Reliablity logo of a sun face in circuit

[hide_from visible_to='public']Please login to have full access.

[login-form]
[password-recovery-link text='Lost Password? Click here to have it emailed to you.']

Not already a member? It's free and takes only a moment to create an account with your email only.

Join

Your membership brings you all these free resources:

  • Live, monthly reliability webinars & recordings
  • eBooks: Finding Value and Reliability Maturity
  • How To articles & insights
  • Podcasts & additional information within podcast show notes
  • Podcast suggestion box to send us a question or topic for a future episode
  • Course (some with a fee)
  • Largest reliability events calendar
  • Course on a range of topics - coming soon
  • Master reliability classes - coming soon
  • Basic tutorial articles - coming soon
  • With more in the works just for members

[/hide_from][show_to accesslevel="Free" ]
Thanks for being a member [member_first_name]!
[/show_to]

© 2026 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy

Book the Course with John
  Ask a question or send along a comment. Please login to view and use the contact form.
This site uses cookies to give you a better experience, analyze site traffic, and gain insight to products or offers that may interest you. By continuing, you consent to the use of cookies. Learn how we use cookies, how they work, and how to set your browser preferences by reading our Cookies Policy.