Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
    • About Us
    • Colophon
    • Survey
  • Reliability.fm
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • NoMTBF
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • ASQR&R
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Maintenance Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • RCM Blitz®
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Field Reliability Data Analysis
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability by Design
      • Reliability Competence
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
      • Reliability Knowledge
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Institute of Quality & Reliability
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Statistical Methods for Failure-Time Data
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Glossary
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinar Sources
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • Your Courses
    • Live Courses
      • Introduction to Reliability Engineering & Accelerated Testings Course Landing Page
      • Advanced Accelerated Testing Course Landing Page
    • Integral Concepts Courses
      • Reliability Analysis Methods Course Landing Page
      • Applied Reliability Analysis Course Landing Page
      • Statistics, Hypothesis Testing, & Regression Modeling Course Landing Page
      • Measurement System Assessment Course Landing Page
      • SPC & Process Capability Course Landing Page
      • Design of Experiments Course Landing Page
    • The Manufacturing Academy Courses
      • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Statistics
      • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
      • Quality Engineering Statistics
      • FMEA in Practice
      • Process Capability Analysis course
      • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
      • Return on Investment online course
    • Industrial Metallurgist Courses
    • FMEA courses Powered by The Luminous Group
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • How to be an Online Student
    • Quondam Courses
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home
  • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction Course Landing Page
  • Upcoming Live Events
You are here: Home / Articles / Is it Time to Kill Your Organization to Build a Better One?

by Mike Sondalini Leave a Comment

Is it Time to Kill Your Organization to Build a Better One?

Is it Time to Kill Your Organization to Build a Better One?

Every organization and organism’s performance is limited to the capability of its design. If you want better business results, then get or build a new organization with systems designed to naturally deliver the outcomes and profits you want. Nothing else you do will ever work as well!

Keywords: business system design, business process management

One definition of a system noted in the online Merriam-Wester dictionary is: a regularly interacting or interdependent group of items forming a unified whole. You are a system. You live within numerous human, familial and natural systems. The organization you work in is a system. It belongs to many business, community and commercial systems. All systems span across space and time. What is done in a system today affects what happens tomorrow in many places.

flow chart showing difference between rat race and the plant wellness way system
Figure 1 – Operational Excellence Needs to Incorporate New Solutions Full of Systems Thinking So Your New Business System Stabilises at a Higher Level of Performance

Once a system is created its maximum performance is dictated by its design. It performs as well as is permitted by the combined effects of those “interacting or interdependent group of items forming a unified whole.” A school is a system, as is a university, as is a home, and the peoples each one creates are a system result. A starfish crawls, and even though it has arms it cannot climb trees. It lives a life matched to and constrained by its physical and environmental systems’ designs.

The systems you live in give you the life you get. I’d love to be an Olympian high jumper and many times I have fanaticized a gold medal. But my body, my own physical system, design will never allow that to happen because my muscular and skeletal structure is incapable of such feats. It would have been a pointless waste of years of my life trying to jump to world record heights.

Every system is limited by its design. A system cannot be better than what it can be, nor can it do more than what its design permits. The fact that everything is a system, that each system plays a part in many systems, and that the performance you get from any system is a design outcome is important to grasp if you are to have a better personal or corporate future. If you have a stable system you will only get whatever the system will deliver. There is no point setting goals or measuring performance because the system already gives you what it can deliver.

The results a system gets are expressions of its natural, inherent behaviours. You can only get out of a system what its parts have the combined capacity to achieve. It explains why starfish live underwater—it’s what its design requires—and why organizations are hardly ever as successful as their owners and managers want them to be—they cannot be a great company because their component parts aren’t built to deliver great performance.

It’s sad news that I have for you about your current organization—if it’s not already a world class performer it is never going to change into a world class performer.

A company survives, it makes money, it meets budget. That is all any business manager wants to achieve. To do more than what the company is now doing will require its management and its culture to change away from the internalized paradigms and inbuilt practices that combine together to deliver the current range of performances and their subsequent results. Employees will never be able to change their organization. Those changes are the duty of the company owners and upper management to do. But there is one thing middle managers and supervisors can try that I’ll explain later.

Your organisation is a stable system. You cannot change stable systems. As much as you may hate what you see happening in the organization, it survives well enough and remains in business. Even though it could be a wonderfully better and more successful company there is no internal drive at the most senior management levels to be such a company. It’s not worth losing a minute of sleep over a company’s performance or what it could become… if only it would change. Don’t waste your time fixing an existing company. Either accept things as they are, or get out and get a job that you love to do, or start a new company designed as you want it to perform.

Stable systems do not change. When their world or environment changes around them a stable system adapts as much as it can, after which it dies out. Your company lives today as its particular system design permits, and if nothing significant changes in its business environment it will also be here tomorrow doing exactly what it does now.

The only option you have is to start a new system that is designed, built and resourced to achieve and live in the better future you want to be in. You need to do what is shown in Figure 1. You have to start a totally separate and independent system that is not poisoned by the beliefs and values of out of date management mind-sets and stifling organizational culture.

If you want to do something great within an existing organization start your own team using volunteers. Keep the team separate to the rest of the organization. Build your own self-contained system of right thinking people doing the right practices. If the new system performs better than what the company can now do, it will either be killed off by the organization to protect itself from change, or the new system will eventually replace the organization in its image. 

It is impossible to make successful change in the current organization until all senior managers willingly want the new future. Owners and top management must act to replace the old system with a new system that can deliver a better organization, and they must be seen to approve the redesign by providing the resources and finance needed to change to a different, better performing, and stable system. 

Because an organization is a system living within systems, and each system causes influencing behaviours in the other systems across both time and space, a great number of things about a company and the systems outside of the company may need to change in order to achieve and sustain a more successful future. Where major enhancements and reengineering needs to be done in an organization it may be better to dismantle the current configuration and build a totally new business system design. 

Many companies want to change for the better and many of them undertake internal change programs. They redesign their processes, issue new procedures and do training of personnel. But the changes will always fail to bring lasting improvement until all systems, both within and without the organization, are changed to a design where their natural outcomes create and sustain the intended improvements. For an organization “all systems” includes each person within the company, each stakeholder impacting the company, and every supply chain vendor outside of the company. It may be necessary to improve or change all those systems in order to get what your organization wants to achieve. 

When you must change your company for the better, then take a deep look at using the Plant Wellness Way methodology to design and build your new enterprise. The Plant Wellness Way EAM methodology contains “tools” used to create and reengineer an organization into a more successful system design built to get great performance that is sustained into the future. 

All the very best to you, 

Mike Sondalini 

Filed Under: Articles, Life Cycle Asset Management, on Maintenance Reliability

About Mike Sondalini

In engineering and maintenance since 1974, Mike’s career extends across original equipment manufacturing, beverage processing and packaging, steel fabrication, chemical processing and manufacturing, quality management, project management, enterprise asset management, plant and equipment maintenance, and maintenance training. His specialty is helping companies build highly effective operational risk management processes, develop enterprise asset management systems for ultra-high reliable assets, and instil the precision maintenance skills needed for world class equipment reliability.

« Risk Registers Over Time
Failure Mode and Mechanism »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Headshot of Mike SondaliniArticles by Mike Sondalini
in the Life Cycle Asset Management article series

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Posts

  • Gremlins today
  • The Power of Vision in Leadership and Organizational Success
  • 3 Types of MTBF Stories
  • ALT: An in Depth Description
  • Project Email Economics

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy