Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
    • About Us
    • Colophon
    • Survey
  • Reliability.fm
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • NoMTBF
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • ASQR&R
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Maintenance Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • RCM Blitz®
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Field Reliability Data Analysis
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability by Design
      • Reliability Competence
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
      • Reliability Knowledge
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Institute of Quality & Reliability
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Statistical Methods for Failure-Time Data
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Glossary
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinar Sources
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • Your Courses
    • Live Courses
      • Introduction to Reliability Engineering & Accelerated Testings Course Landing Page
      • Advanced Accelerated Testing Course Landing Page
    • Integral Concepts Courses
      • Reliability Analysis Methods Course Landing Page
      • Applied Reliability Analysis Course Landing Page
      • Statistics, Hypothesis Testing, & Regression Modeling Course Landing Page
      • Measurement System Assessment Course Landing Page
      • SPC & Process Capability Course Landing Page
      • Design of Experiments Course Landing Page
    • The Manufacturing Academy Courses
      • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Statistics
      • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
      • Quality Engineering Statistics
      • FMEA in Practice
      • Process Capability Analysis course
      • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
      • Return on Investment online course
    • Industrial Metallurgist Courses
    • FMEA courses Powered by The Luminous Group
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • How to be an Online Student
    • Quondam Courses
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home
  • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction Course Landing Page
  • Upcoming Live Events
You are here: Home / Articles / How Big Fortunes Are Made with the Plant Wellness Way 

by Mike Sondalini Leave a Comment

How Big Fortunes Are Made with the Plant Wellness Way 

How Big Fortunes Are Made with the Plant Wellness Way 

 Let a Plant Wellness Way EAM System-of-Reliability halve your Annual Maintenance Costs 

A Plant Wellness Way enterprise asset management system is a powerful solution for world class enterprise asset management (EAM) success. There are three scenarios when it is justifiable for a business to adopt PWW EAM as your company’s EAM methodology.

  1. When you have already spent lots of time and money trying to get world class plant and equipment reliability, but your site is still well short of that level of performance. 
  2. When you do not have the time or money to lose on the quest to climb to world class production asset reliability and performance and your site must be successful on the first attempt. 
  3. When you are unsure how to get your site to deliver world class production equipment results, but your operation must become that good for your company to survive in business. 

Justifying the cost to adopt the Plant Wellness Way (PWW) to get world class enterprise asset management results is a dilemma facing every organization who wants to use it. How can you make a business case to spend twice as much money to build a holistic Plant Wellness Way EAM system than what it costs to use other EAM methodologies? The answer is in the lasting extra operating profits that PWW brings you compared to what can be gained with less successful EAM solutions. 

PWW uses life-cycle risk elimination to eradicate plant and equipment failures by creating outstanding parts reliability. It makes you design and build a business in which your machinery and equipment go right all the time. The fortunes saved from production and equipment failures you don’t have become banked operating profits. The expected savings give you a way to justify using PWW by estimating the return on investment (ROI) from the new fortunes you can get if there were no operational failures in future because you follow the Plant Wellness Way. 

When you have a fully developed Plant Wellness Way lifetime reliability system in your operation you can expect world class reliability from your production plant and equipment. World class industrial, manufacturing, and process-based operations can reach 1% Annual Maintenance Cost to Replacement Asset Value (RAV) ratio. If you are now at 3% annual maintenance cost vs. RAV, you should expect to get down to a ratio of 1.5% with PWW. On a USD $100,000,000 asset base, spending USD $3,000,000 on maintenance per year, expect to save USD $1,500,000 annually. If you are at 10% RAV the Plant Wellness Way will drive that ratio down to as close to 1% as is humanly and technologically possible to achieve. Certainly, if your operation is a long way from world class, a 50% reduction in annual maintenance cost vs. RAV ratio should be your minimum expectation from adopting the Plant Wellness Way. 

This gives you a second means to estimate the ROI from the Plant Wellness Way by using the expected improvement in the maintenance cost to Replacement Asset Value ratio. The lower RAV ratio lets you gauge the worth of the financial value and operational benefits that PWW can bring to your company. If you already are in a world class operating site with a 1% annual maintenance costs to RAV ratio, then PWW will push you far out in front of the rest of your industry and keep you there. 

How is it that by using PWW you can be so radically more successful and profitable? It’s because the Plant Wellness Way will only let you do what is the most profitable thing to do. Adopting PWW causes the following five outcomes to happen for a company. 

1. The frequency of equipment failures drops to a third or less of what they now are. 

2. Supply chain vendors, suppliers, and sub-contractors eliminate the future operating risks that they pass to you, thereby giving you lasting, extra operating profits. 

3. Capital project designers maximize your operating profits with every choice they make. 

4. The Operational processes are optimized so that your plant and equipment intentionally make the most operating profit for your company. 

5. The Maintenance processes optimize production asset reliability so that your plant and equipment intentionally cost the least to use. 

Making a Business Case to Test Plant Wellness Way EAM in Your Operation 

The expected halving of annual maintenance costs in operations with 3% or higher annual maintenance cost to RAV ratio is a powerful business case to justify testing and trialling the Plant Wellness Way in such companies. A 50% reduction in maintenance costs lets you easily gauge the size of the potential new operating profits generated by using PWW. 

Simplified Project Plan
Table 1—Simplified Project Plan for a Plant Wellness Way Implementation for One Asset 

A test of PWW on a major asset in your operation requires three weeks of work. It’s likely that time will be spread over about two months, so project activities are done at times convenient to your operation’s working regime. Two consultants using your operation’s office facilities form the normal compliment of persons put on a site’s Plant Wellness Way implementation project. Their project hours total a cost of around USD $40,000. Other expenses will include accommodation, travel, and sundry items. A budget allowance of USD $500 per day per person is reasonable for sites in the same country as the consultants. This brings the total cost to trial the Plant Wellness Way for a reasonably complex asset to about USD $55,000. The payback expected is to halve the asset’s annual maintenance costs on sites that are not yet top-class performers. 

Substantial efficiencies accrue when large numbers of assets are included in a PWW adoption project. A reasonable expectation of the average cost per production asset for a site with 100 assets would be around USD $25,000 per asset. From the project an operation can expect to halve its maintenance spend. 

You can now make a business case to trial PWW on one sizeable industrial asset—USD $55,000 for the test to halve the asset’s annual maintenance cost. Similarly, you can judge the ROI of using PWW site-wide—USD $2,500,000 cost per 100 large industrial assets to halve the annual maintenance cost vs. RAV ratio. Sites with simple engineered assets can expect to pay less per asset. 

The reduction in the annual maintenance cost vs. RAV costing approach used above is useful for quickly gauging the worth of conducting a PWW trial. To get an accurate cost estimate requires us to quote on the specific test asset used in the project. Nonetheless, those allowances are indicative to determine the magnitude of the moneys you will pay (and the new profits you can make) to do a trial of the Plant Wellness Way. 

To learn more on how to test the Plant Wellness Way at your site, or to get the full project details and costs of a trial, start by contacting your nearest Plant Wellness Way EAM Consultant. 

The entire Plant Wellness Way methodology is explained in the Industrial and Manufacturing Wellness book. The hardcover book is available from the publisher’s website: https://books.industrialpress.com/9780831135904/industrial-and-manufacturing-wellness/ the ebook version is at https://ebooks.industrialpress.com/product/industrial-manufacturing-wellness. 

The book is also at Amazon Books: https://www.amazon.com/Industrial-Manufacturing-Wellness-Mike-Sondalini/dp/0831135905/. 

All the greatest success to you and to your operation, 

Mike Sondalini

Filed Under: Articles, Life Cycle Asset Management, on Maintenance Reliability

About Mike Sondalini

In engineering and maintenance since 1974, Mike’s career extends across original equipment manufacturing, beverage processing and packaging, steel fabrication, chemical processing and manufacturing, quality management, project management, enterprise asset management, plant and equipment maintenance, and maintenance training. His specialty is helping companies build highly effective operational risk management processes, develop enterprise asset management systems for ultra-high reliable assets, and instil the precision maintenance skills needed for world class equipment reliability.

« Total Productive Maintenance and CMMS
ISO 31000 Risk Assessments »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Headshot of Mike SondaliniArticles by Mike Sondalini
in the Life Cycle Asset Management article series

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Posts

  • Gremlins today
  • The Power of Vision in Leadership and Organizational Success
  • 3 Types of MTBF Stories
  • ALT: An in Depth Description
  • Project Email Economics

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy