Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
    • About Us
    • Colophon
    • Survey
  • Reliability.fm
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • NoMTBF
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • ASQR&R
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Maintenance Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • RCM Blitz®
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Field Reliability Data Analysis
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability by Design
      • Reliability Competence
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
      • Reliability Knowledge
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Institute of Quality & Reliability
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Statistical Methods for Failure-Time Data
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Glossary
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinar Sources
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • Your Courses
    • Live Courses
      • Introduction to Reliability Engineering & Accelerated Testings Course Landing Page
      • Advanced Accelerated Testing Course Landing Page
    • Integral Concepts Courses
      • Reliability Analysis Methods Course Landing Page
      • Applied Reliability Analysis Course Landing Page
      • Statistics, Hypothesis Testing, & Regression Modeling Course Landing Page
      • Measurement System Assessment Course Landing Page
      • SPC & Process Capability Course Landing Page
      • Design of Experiments Course Landing Page
    • The Manufacturing Academy Courses
      • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Statistics
      • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
      • Quality Engineering Statistics
      • FMEA in Practice
      • Process Capability Analysis course
      • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
      • Return on Investment online course
    • Industrial Metallurgist Courses
    • FMEA courses Powered by The Luminous Group
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • How to be an Online Student
    • Quondam Courses
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home
  • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction Course Landing Page
  • Upcoming Live Events
You are here: Home / Articles / Example Accuracy Controlled Enterprise (ACE) 3T Job Procedure

by Mike Sondalini Leave a Comment

Example Accuracy Controlled Enterprise (ACE) 3T Job Procedure

Example Accuracy Controlled Enterprise (ACE) 3T Job Procedure

Example ACE 3T (Target-Tolerance-Test) Procedure with Reliability Standards: Machine performance is totally dependent on human beings. To address the problem of human error causing equipment failure, an Accuracy Controlled Enterprise sets best practice quality standards and uses 3T Target-Tolerance-Test work task quality control that assures high quality workmanship for high reliability results. Their work procedures are standardised so everyone follows the same methods to produce the same results, their training teaches people how to do craftsmanship work that creates outstandingly reliable plant and machinery. They create the reliability they want and as a result achieve operational excellence.

Keywords: precision job procedures, maintenance work quality assurance,

High equipment reliability requires parts made to precise sizes and assembled to precision standards. Our machines and equipment are dumb, lifeless objects that cannot tell they are suffering and in trouble. They cannot adjust their behaviour when stress and strain gets too much. They just brake and die. It is up to us to make machines work properly by ensuring they are made well and kept healthy. If we want high equipment reliability we need to use the skills, methods and processes that produce high equipment reliability.

Maintenance work processes that deliver better than 3-sigma quality accuracy (7 errors per hundred opportunities for error) are uncommon in industry. Most maintenance and repair work processes range from 2-sigma to 2-1/2-sigma, or 30 to 10 errors respectively per 100 opportunities1. You can truly say that due to human error maintenance destroys the equipment that it is meant to maintain reliably. To address that problem an Accuracy Controlled Enterprise creates high quality work procedures full of double-checks and measurable task quality standards that must be met. An example ACE 3T Procedure with work reliability quality standards for mounting spherical roller bearings on shaft adaptor sleeves in Plummer blocks follows.

With an ACE 3T procedure high maintenance work quality is assured. It also brings many other wonderful benefits to organisations that chose to become great at operational excellence. It sets standards that everyone must adhere to, from equipment vendor to subcontractor to employee to professional engineer. It allows workmanship skills to be trained for targeted reliability outcomes. It drives continuous reliability improvement as people reach higher and higher workmanship quality standards and become an Accuracy Controlled Expert. ACE 3T procedures are written at three levels of work quality performance. The lowest work quality level is the best of current site practices; it is ’bronze medal’ level performance. The third level is set at world class reliability standards and tells everyone where they need to be if they want to deliver ‘gold medal’ results reliability (To be that good takes training in precision maintenance skills, use of quality control proof-tests and a mindset that values high quality workmanship.). In-between is the intermediate level, which is a hard stretch target above the best existing level of work quality; it is ‘silver medal’ standard.

Writing an ACE 3T maintenance procedure takes a lot of research into the fine technical details of what delivers ultra-high reliability, you need to appreciate and understand exacting engineering standards and be able to decide which apply in a situation, it needs a good grasp of the reliability of a design and of materials of construction issues. It is the work of technically competent and engineering knowledgeable persons working together with trade savvy people to create a document that helps technicians to do expert, masterly work first-time, every-time.

Best regards, Mike Sondalini

1 Smith, Dr, David J., Reliability, Maintainability and Risk, Seventh Edition, Appendix 6, Elsevier, 2005

[wpmfpdf id=”501712″ embed=”1″]

Filed Under: Articles, Maintenance Management, on Maintenance Reliability

About Mike Sondalini

In engineering and maintenance since 1974, Mike’s career extends across original equipment manufacturing, beverage processing and packaging, steel fabrication, chemical processing and manufacturing, quality management, project management, enterprise asset management, plant and equipment maintenance, and maintenance training. His specialty is helping companies build highly effective operational risk management processes, develop enterprise asset management systems for ultra-high reliable assets, and instil the precision maintenance skills needed for world class equipment reliability.

« Why are Failure Modes So Important to Reliability?
System Engineers Rule Robotic Design »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Headshot of Mike SondaliniArticles by Mike Sondalini
in the Maintenance Management article series

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Posts

  • Leadership Values in Maintenance and Operations
  • Today’s Gremlin – It’ll never work here
  • How a Mission Statement Drives Behavioral Change in Organizations
  • Gremlins today
  • The Power of Vision in Leadership and Organizational Success

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy