Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
    • About Us
    • Colophon
    • Survey
  • Reliability.fm
    • Speaking Of Reliability
    • Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
    • Quality during Design
    • CMMSradio
    • Way of the Quality Warrior
    • Critical Talks
    • Asset Performance
    • Dare to Know
    • Maintenance Disrupted
    • Metal Conversations
    • The Leadership Connection
    • Practical Reliability Podcast
    • Reliability Hero
    • Reliability Matters
    • Reliability it Matters
    • Maintenance Mavericks Podcast
    • Women in Maintenance
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • NoMTBF
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • ASQR&R
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Maintenance Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • RCM Blitz®
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Breaking Bad for Reliability
      • Field Reliability Data Analysis
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability by Design
      • Reliability Competence
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
      • Reliability Knowledge
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • The RCA
      • Communicating with FINESSE
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Institute of Quality & Reliability
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Statistical Methods for Failure-Time Data
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Hardware Product Develoment Lifecycle
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Special Offers
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Glossary
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinar Sources
    • Journals
    • Higher Education
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • Your Courses
    • 14 Ways to Acquire Reliability Engineering Knowledge
    • Live Courses
      • Introduction to Reliability Engineering & Accelerated Testings Course Landing Page
      • Advanced Accelerated Testing Course Landing Page
    • Integral Concepts Courses
      • Reliability Analysis Methods Course Landing Page
      • Applied Reliability Analysis Course Landing Page
      • Statistics, Hypothesis Testing, & Regression Modeling Course Landing Page
      • Measurement System Assessment Course Landing Page
      • SPC & Process Capability Course Landing Page
      • Design of Experiments Course Landing Page
    • The Manufacturing Academy Courses
      • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Statistics
      • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
      • Quality Engineering Statistics
      • FMEA in Practice
      • Process Capability Analysis course
      • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
      • Return on Investment online course
    • Industrial Metallurgist Courses
    • FMEA courses Powered by The Luminous Group
      • FMEA Introduction
      • AIAG & VDA FMEA Methodology
    • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction
      • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction Course Landing Page
    • Fault Tree Analysis (FTA)
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • How to be an Online Student
    • Quondam Courses
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Live Events
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home
Home » Articles » on Maintenance Reliability » Maintenance Management » Developing a Planned Maintenance Strategy based on Criticality

by Mike Sondalini Leave a Comment

Developing a Planned Maintenance Strategy based on Criticality

Developing a Planned Maintenance Strategy based on Criticality

Use Equipment Criticality to Match Planned Maintenance Strategy to the Operational Risks

Planned maintenance has the purpose of rejuvenating equipment before parts start failing. Use maintenance strategy based on continual renewal to reduce operating equipment risk of failure so that you have your plant and equipment in good condition and thus free of age and stress related defects waiting for the chance to fail.

Abstract:

Match Your Planned Maintenance Strategy to Equipment Criticality. This article takes you through the factors which you need to consider and perform when developing a planned maintenance strategy incorporating both proactive preventive and predictive maintenance. If you are spending the majority of your maintenance effort in reactive tasks then your maintenance costs are high. If you can spend the majority of your maintenance effort doing planned maintenance activities you will lower your maintenance costs and have more reliable production plant.

The approach relies on identifying equipment criticality based on the impact that equipment failure has on production. The failure modes that cause breakdowns are identified and the necessary planned maintenance to address the failures are specified. The required frequency to perform the planned maintenance activity is set so that it is done before a failure occurs.

Keyword:  planned maintenance, reactive maintenance, proactive maintenance, equipment criticality,

Objective:

a.   To reduce the maintenance costs in the plant to industry standard percentage of replacement asset value.

b.   To reduce breakdown maintenance costs below 10% of total maintenance cost for the plant by conducting planned maintenance activities that renew plant and equipment before failure occurs.

Methodology:

The method to achieve the above objectives are summarised in the following steps;

  1. It is first necessary to check what proportion of maintenance effort is being used on reactive work fixing things verses pro-active work that stops them from breaking in the first place. You want to be spending most of the maintenance time doing proactive work. It is also necessary to identify what proportion of maintenance effort is being used on not doing maintenance related work.Review the last two years history of maintenance work and separate into four categories of Proactive, Reactive, Improvement and Assistance work. Compile costs and man-hours per category to determine proportions of cost and effort spent for each.Proactive includes preventative maintenance, predictive maintenance, condition monitoring, statutory maintenance, etc. Reactive includes breakdown maintenance, corrective maintenance, emergency maintenance, safety or incident related maintenance, etc. Improvement includes equipment or process modifications. Assistance is maintenance resources used in capital projects, plant upgrades, production requirements, etc.
  2. Collate full plant equipment list from plant drawings, process drawings and equipment asset lists. Be sure to capture all equipment in operation as it will later be necessary to go to component and sub-sub-component levels of analysis, and maybe further.
  3. Using the equipment listing create a spreadsheet showing all the equipment used in each part of the production process. Logically divide the production process into definable sections of the process. Under each section list each item of equipment in process use order.Layout the spreadsheet so that in column 1 you list the process section, column 2 the equipment it contains, column 3 the individual equipment’s components, column 4 the sub-components, column 5 the sub-sub-components.
  4. It is necessary to identify the impact of losing each item of equipment on production. This is done by conducting a criticality assessment of the plant and the equipment used in each part of the production process.Start by meeting with experienced Operations people to determine the failure impact on production for each item of equipment. Rate the impact of the individual equipment on the process sections using a 5-point scale. 1 is immediate and total impact. 2 is delayed total impact.  3 is reduced or hindered operation.  4 is inconvenience to operation.  5 is no impact.Work your way through all the plant deciding how the equipment impacts on the process should it fail.
  5. On the same spreadsheet used in the Operations criticality review extend it to include all the equipment assemblies and sub-components under the respective equipment.  List down to the lowest sub-assembly or component in the equipment for which you are willing to store as a spare part.Meet with experienced maintenance personnel and rate the criticality of assemblies and components in each item of equipment using the same criteria as previous.  For each item of equipment record the spare parts considered critical to have to keep the equipment operating.To get a numerical criticalty rating see the spreadsheet below. Basically you sum the ratings and divide by the number of time an item is rated. If the rating is between 1 and 1.33 it is highly critical and you should consider stocking critical spares. It will require condition monitoring and preventative maintenance. If between 1.34 and 1.67 it is moderately important and a preventative maintenance strategy is required. If above 1.67 it is of lesser importance and a mix of preventative and breakdown maintenance would be considered.
  1. From CMMS records for past five years identify the failure modes, frequency of failures and the annual maintenance costs per equipment. If the plant has been substantially changed in that time then take the records as from the date of the up-grade commissioning. Where job costs are reliable and accurate, identified costs, man-hour and materials required for regularly recurring repairs to assist future estimating purposes.
  2. Using Pareto analysis, identify the high maintenance cost equipment recorded in the CMMS during the past five years. Each of the top 20% of equipment items is to later be analysed to identify causes and possible solutions as a separate part to this exercise.
  3. Conduct an on-site tour and review of plant and equipment with experienced Operations and Maintenance personnel to identify operating problems not reflected in the maintenance records. Identify problem equipment, failure frequency, consequences and spares required for each plant asset. Cross-check the CMMS review outcomes against site tour review results to confirm all issues are recorded.
  4. Using the criticality spreadsheet, sit down with experienced operators and maintainers and create planned maintenance activities to address high risk and frequent occurrences. Create planned maintenance activities to perform preventative maintenance, condition monitoring, renewal or refurbishment of equipment and components.  Set the timing for the planned maintenance so that the activity prevents the failure.Secondly, with the help of operations personnel develop operator inspection and check sheets so that operators can perform watch-keeping activities during their normal rounds.Third, review if the current planned and preventative maintenance activities are still relevant or need to change to suit the new planned maintenance requirements.Fourthly, include activities relating to statutory compliance and other works that will not be identified during this process.
  5. Develop each planned maintenance activity to have a scope of works with itemised tasks, materials list and cost estimation, provide materials lead time indication, trade man-hours estimation, and the total work order cost estimate.
  6. For each item of production equipment, cost model the new planned maintenance activities and compare the cost to the current maintenance costs to ensure justification to proceed with changing the maintenance strategy.  Review new balance of costs between expected Reactive and Proactive categories to confirm the majority of time is spent on proactive pursuits.
  7. Catalogue and cost the spares identified as critical requirements for plant and equipment from the criticality analysis.Detail the spares required for planned maintenance activities each financial year for inclusion in the annual financial budget.Update critical spares list and order spares in a controlled and responsible financial manner.
  8. Prepare the maintenance schedule and budget for the year in advance, including formulating a plan for maintenance on the plant which incorporates the new planned work orders. Update CMMS with the new planned maintenance work order details. Develop the resulting maintenance resource demand into an overall resource schedule.
  9. Submit the plant maintenance budget into the corporate accounts and track performance.

My best regards to you,

Mike Sondalini
Managing Director
Lifetime Reliability Solutions HQ

Filed Under: Articles, Maintenance Management, on Maintenance Reliability

About Mike Sondalini

In engineering and maintenance since 1974, Mike’s career extends across original equipment manufacturing, beverage processing and packaging, steel fabrication, chemical processing and manufacturing, quality management, project management, enterprise asset management, plant and equipment maintenance, and maintenance training. His specialty is helping companies build highly effective operational risk management processes, develop enterprise asset management systems for ultra-high reliable assets, and instil the precision maintenance skills needed for world class equipment reliability.

« Hardware Product Realization in the Age of AI
How to Create a Positive Risk Culture »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Headshot of Mike SondaliniArticles by Mike Sondalini
in the Maintenance Management article series
[show_to accesslevel="Free" ] Thanks for being a member [member_first_name]! [/show_to][hide_from visible_to='public']

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member. It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

[/hide_from]

Recent Posts

  • How to Create a Positive Risk Culture
  • Developing a Planned Maintenance Strategy based on Criticality
  • Hardware Product Realization in the Age of AI
  • Are You Writing Failure Modes All Wrong? Learn the Truth
  • Decoding Early Thermal Stress in Rotating Equipment

© 2026 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy

Book the Course with John
  Ask a question or send along a comment. Please login to view and use the contact form.
This site uses cookies to give you a better experience, analyze site traffic, and gain insight to products or offers that may interest you. By continuing, you consent to the use of cookies. Learn how we use cookies, how they work, and how to set your browser preferences by reading our Cookies Policy.