Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
    • About Us
    • Colophon
    • Survey
  • Reliability.fm
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • NoMTBF
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • ASQR&R
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Maintenance Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • RCM Blitz®
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Field Reliability Data Analysis
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability by Design
      • Reliability Competence
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
      • Reliability Knowledge
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Institute of Quality & Reliability
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Statistical Methods for Failure-Time Data
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Glossary
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinar Sources
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • Your Courses
    • Live Courses
      • Introduction to Reliability Engineering & Accelerated Testings Course Landing Page
      • Advanced Accelerated Testing Course Landing Page
    • Integral Concepts Courses
      • Reliability Analysis Methods Course Landing Page
      • Applied Reliability Analysis Course Landing Page
      • Statistics, Hypothesis Testing, & Regression Modeling Course Landing Page
      • Measurement System Assessment Course Landing Page
      • SPC & Process Capability Course Landing Page
      • Design of Experiments Course Landing Page
    • The Manufacturing Academy Courses
      • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Statistics
      • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
      • Quality Engineering Statistics
      • FMEA in Practice
      • Process Capability Analysis course
      • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
      • Return on Investment online course
    • Industrial Metallurgist Courses
    • FMEA courses Powered by The Luminous Group
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • How to be an Online Student
    • Quondam Courses
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home
  • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction Course Landing Page
  • Upcoming Live Events
You are here: Home / Articles / Why We Struggle with Building Better Presentations (and what to do about it)

by JD Solomon Leave a Comment

Why We Struggle with Building Better Presentations (and what to do about it)

Why We Struggle with Building Better Presentations (and what to do about it)

Most technical professionals find themselves bogged down by inefficient presentation preparation methods that result in information overload and diluted messaging. We need a better way. Presenting effectively to non-technical professionals is critical for conveying strategic visions, securing stakeholder buy-in, and driving decision-making. Improving the presentation development process results in increased productivity, cost savings, effective communication, and better work-life balance. This article explores ways to streamline the development of better business presentations.

Let’s Start with Us

Before we jump into what’s wrong with everyone else, let’s take stock of where technical professionals stand. First, we often are not good communicators because we focus on the hard skills. Second, because we are accomplished engineers, physicists, and computer scientists (you name it), we falsely believe that we can learn soft skills as we go. Third, we believe our facts are right, and certainly our facts will carry the day.

All of this is certainly debatable. What is certain is that our traditional processes do not work efficiently and effectively for most of us. Business presentations consume our more productive time, our work-life balance is out of whack, and we often don’t get our information into the presentation.

How Organizations Struggle

Most organizations start from the position that creating business presentations that include technical information and analysis takes a considerable amount of time. These are my top three ways organizations struggle with business presentations.

1. Complexity of Technical Content

Most organizations find it challenging and time consuming to translate complex technical details into understandable and engaging content for a diverse audience.

2. Collaboration and Input

Achieving stakeholder agreement on key points and conclusions involves discussions, revisions, and sometimes lengthy negotiations. Organizations struggle with working across different specialties and business units.

3. Presentation Design

Organizations pay the marketing and visual design departments a lot of money. Creating visually appealing slides that effectively convey complex information requires design skills and tools, which can take significant time.

4. Approval Processes

No one in management wants to step out of line. Multiple layers of review and approval can add to the timeline, especially in large organizations.

5. Time Management and Prioritization

Internal project management sucks in most organizations, even at firms that specialize in project management.

Why Organizations Struggle

Fear is the main reason organizations struggle. I’ll leave the sources of those fears to debate, but the first one is that senior management has too little confidence in our soft skills. These are my top three fears, plus one.

1. Fear of Missing Important Information

Organizations fear omitting critical information for decision-making or understanding. Including extensive details upfront is seen as a way to mitigate this risk.

2. Fear of Under-Preparation (and a sloppy end product)

Organizations often start with a comprehensive approach to ensure all possible aspects and details are covered. This ensures no critical information is missed but can lead to an overload of content.

3. Fear of Not Being Concise

Senior management instinctively knows that they are over-conservative on the front end. So, the process of refining a presentation typically involves gradually distilling and prioritizing information based on feedback, leading to a reduction from an initially extensive base.

4. Compliance with Organizational Practices

Organizational practices and procedures often dictate a thorough, detailed initial draft that is gradually refined. The process stinks. On the other hand, our fear of non-compliance with marginal organizational practices often makes things worse than they need to be.

What We Can Do About It

Technical professionals can create presentations that are more focused, engaging, and easier to follow, ultimately saving time and effort in the preparation process. This often requires you to get out in front of marginal or poor organizational practices. Remember, you control the data and information. Having a good report, or at least a good executive summary, is where most good presentations are born.

1. Start Simple and Build Complexity

Like any analytical model or methodology, the best practice is to start simple and build complexity. Start with fewer slides and less information. Build complexity later, if needed.

2. Have a Methodology

We don’t design pressure vessels or cantilevered structures without having a methodology. Trial and error with respect to hard skills can injure or kill. Trial and error related to soft skills can injure or kill a career.

3. Focus on Accessibility

Language, visual, and hearing impairments are three barriers to communication that will impact between 10 and 25 percent of your audience. Start any presentation by resolving not to lose people with one of these three barriers. That approach makes it easier for everyone else, too.

4. Avoid Too Many Cooks in the Kitchen

If you have been asked to speak as a technical professional, data and information are likely to be a key concern. Own it. Control it.

5. Provide The Information in Advance

No one likes to be surprised, and “grand reveals” are disrespectful. A best practice is to share your presentation in advance. You’ll also find it relieves some mental pressure on you and your team.

The Quest to Develop Better Business Presentations

Business presentations that include technical analysis demand multifaceted attention to detail, collaboration, design, and customization. Unfortunately, our fears lead us to build too much complexity up-front, which requires a lot of valuable resources. The results are often less than stellar. This brief article provides five ways for technical professionals to build better business presentations.


The elements of the FINESSE fishbone diagram® are Frame, Illustrate, Noise reduction, Empathy, Structure, Synergy, and Ethics. Communicating with FINESSE is a not-for-profit community of technical professionals dedicated to being highly effective communicators and facilitators. Learn more about our publications, webinars, and workshops. Join the community for free.

Filed Under: Articles, Communicating with FINESSE, on Systems Thinking Tagged With: FINESSE, information, non-technical professionals, presentations, senior management

About JD Solomon

JD Solomon, PE, CRE, CMRP provides facilitation, business case evaluation, root cause analysis, and risk management. His roles as a senior leader in two Fortune 500 companies, as a town manager, and as chairman of a state regulatory board provide him with a first-hand perspective of how senior decision-makers think. His technical expertise in systems engineering and risk & uncertainty analysis using Monte Carlo simulation provides him practical perspectives on the strengths and limitations of advanced technical approaches.  In practice, JD works with front-line staff and executive leaders to create workable solutions for facilities, infrastructure, and business processes.

« Lifetime Evaluation vs. Measurement. Part 2.
Design of Experiments: Terms and Definitions »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Headshot of JD SolomonArticles by JD Solomon
in the Communicating with FINESSE article series

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Posts

  • Today’s Gremlin – It’ll never work here
  • How a Mission Statement Drives Behavioral Change in Organizations
  • Gremlins today
  • The Power of Vision in Leadership and Organizational Success
  • 3 Types of MTBF Stories

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy