Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
    • About Us
    • Colophon
    • Survey
  • Reliability.fm
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • NoMTBF
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • ASQR&R
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Maintenance Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • RCM Blitz®
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Field Reliability Data Analysis
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability by Design
      • Reliability Competence
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
      • Reliability Knowledge
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Institute of Quality & Reliability
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Statistical Methods for Failure-Time Data
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Glossary
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinar Sources
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • Your Courses
    • Live Courses
      • Introduction to Reliability Engineering & Accelerated Testings Course Landing Page
      • Advanced Accelerated Testing Course Landing Page
    • Integral Concepts Courses
      • Reliability Analysis Methods Course Landing Page
      • Applied Reliability Analysis Course Landing Page
      • Statistics, Hypothesis Testing, & Regression Modeling Course Landing Page
      • Measurement System Assessment Course Landing Page
      • SPC & Process Capability Course Landing Page
      • Design of Experiments Course Landing Page
    • The Manufacturing Academy Courses
      • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Statistics
      • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
      • Quality Engineering Statistics
      • FMEA in Practice
      • Process Capability Analysis course
      • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
      • Return on Investment online course
    • Industrial Metallurgist Courses
    • FMEA courses Powered by The Luminous Group
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • How to be an Online Student
    • Quondam Courses
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home
  • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction Course Landing Page
  • Upcoming Live Events
You are here: Home / Articles / on Product Reliability / Apex Ridge / Why?

by Adam Bahret 2 Comments

Why?

Why?

When something is working it is easy to just keep going forward.  But how do you know things will keep chugging along? Is it worth stopping and asking “Why is this going well?”

I like lock picking “Lock Sport.”  Of course I do.  It’s a mechanical puzzle.  It can also make you look like James Bond when someone forget’s their keys.  I continue to challenge myself by getting progressively harder and harder locks.  Throughout the years lock designs have come up with some great features to resist being picked.  But there is still not one out there that is “pick proof”, so there is always a next level.  I would say I am a mid-intermediate in the world of Lock Sport.  So any lock that actually has good picking defenses can give me a good struggle.

I recently purchased a lock that is considered to be pretty hard because of the addition of two spool pins and one serrated pin.  These pins are intended to mess up your feedback as you pick.  Feedback is the name of the game when picking.  I have gotten to where I can pick this lock on one of every 10 tries.  But the feeling of progressive accomplishment for that success wasn’t very strong.  I couldn’t tell you exactly how I had been successfully picking it.  I had subconsciously figured out a technique that worked sometimes but there was no way I could describe it clearly.  So I didn’t know the “Why?” Which made me feel like if the technique stopped working I wouldn’t know how to fix it. At dinner I said “Beth, I can pick that new lock but I can’t tell you why I can pick it.  It’s really frustrating.” She said, “Maybe you should just go with the flow.”  I didn’t like that answer.  Go with the flow?, Progress without knowing why? Nope not ok.  But since then I haven’t progressed because I keep on stopping to study what I am doing. If I do just keep picking it, it does seem that I can get better at it. What to do?  Continue to advance but feel uneasy about it or stop progressing for now and figure out what the last thing I did is that advanced my technique?

This reminds me of advice I give my customers. “It’s ok to be doing well but it is a sign of a higher level of product development maturity to know why you are doing well.”  I argue that if you know “why” you are doing well with product reliability, this allows you to control the factors that are making it work so well.  This is the mitigation against those surprise failures when a variable changes in manufacturing, use, or environment.  But based on Beth’s advice and my experience with this lock I wonder if in some cases you should just keep going forward.  “Is it ok to sometimes just keep doing what works and not stopping the train to study the tracks?”  A lot of great success stories have started with someone saying “Screw it, let’s go!”

I don’t have an answer and I am sure it is somewhere in the middle.  Maybe there is a way to know when to say “The hell with it just keep going.”  and when to say “Wait let’s slow down and figure out the details of how this works.”  An actual quantitative “Risk and Reward” analysis.  Would the result be a scale with one end being, ‘Don’t ask questions, just keep picking that thing so we can get in and defuse the bomb!” and the other being “We need to document a procedure on how to do this task so we can teach others and spread the benefit of this technique around the world.”  Maybe it’s worth thinking about a way to do this with product design.

-Adam

Side notes:

  • Yes that is really the kind of dinner conversation that happens in my house
  • No that’s not really a Christmas ornament, I just put my clear lock on the tree for the picture. This also made me the first person to break a bulb this year because it was so heavy and it hit another branch.
  • I chuckle a little every time I think that lock pickers call their hobby “Lock Sport.”  These are geeks sitting alone playing a puzzle making it sound like some kind of ultra cool martial arts.

“Hi nice to meet you.  What do you do for fun?”

“Oh.. I do LockSport.”

“Wow that sounds crazy have you ever hurt or killed any of your opponents?”

  • How lock picking works.  A lock is almost unpickable based on a mechanical drawing of one.  The lock picker is taking advantage of part tolerances that make it so only one pin is resisting rotation of the tumbler at any given moment.  So even two of the same model of lock are each a unique puzzle.  It’s the variability of manufacturing and assembly that makes it pickable, i.e. a susceptibility to failure. I think my hobbies and work no longer have any differentiation.

 

Filed Under: Apex Ridge, Articles, on Product Reliability

About Adam Bahret

I am a Reliability engineer with over 20 years of experience in mechanical and electrical systems in many industries. I founded Apex Ridge Reliability as a firm to assist technology companies with the critical reliability steps in their product development programs and organizational culture.

« Political Risk and Enterprise Risk Management
How To Create An Environment of Innovation »

Comments

  1. Jay Uppal says

    December 13, 2018 at 6:09 AM

    Need to request Fred to add a ‘like’ button on such articles.
    +1 from my end.
    Jay

    Reply
  2. Adam bahret says

    December 13, 2018 at 7:25 AM

    Jay
    Thanks!!!! Appreciate it.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Article by Adam Bahret
in the Apex Ridge series

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Articles

  • Gremlins today
  • The Power of Vision in Leadership and Organizational Success
  • 3 Types of MTBF Stories
  • ALT: An in Depth Description
  • Project Email Economics

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy