Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
    • About Us
    • Colophon
    • Survey
  • Reliability.fm
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • NoMTBF
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • ASQR&R
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Maintenance Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • RCM Blitz®
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Field Reliability Data Analysis
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability by Design
      • Reliability Competence
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
      • Reliability Knowledge
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Institute of Quality & Reliability
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Statistical Methods for Failure-Time Data
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Glossary
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinar Sources
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • Your Courses
    • Live Courses
      • Introduction to Reliability Engineering & Accelerated Testings Course Landing Page
      • Advanced Accelerated Testing Course Landing Page
    • Integral Concepts Courses
      • Reliability Analysis Methods Course Landing Page
      • Applied Reliability Analysis Course Landing Page
      • Statistics, Hypothesis Testing, & Regression Modeling Course Landing Page
      • Measurement System Assessment Course Landing Page
      • SPC & Process Capability Course Landing Page
      • Design of Experiments Course Landing Page
    • The Manufacturing Academy Courses
      • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Statistics
      • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
      • Quality Engineering Statistics
      • FMEA in Practice
      • Process Capability Analysis course
      • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
      • Return on Investment online course
    • Industrial Metallurgist Courses
    • FMEA courses Powered by The Luminous Group
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • How to be an Online Student
    • Quondam Courses
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home
  • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction Course Landing Page
  • Upcoming Live Events
You are here: Home / Articles / Using Process FMEAs to Improve Process Control Plans

by Carl S. Carlson Leave a Comment

Using Process FMEAs to Improve Process Control Plans

Using Process FMEAs to Improve Process Control Plans

“Science is the process that takes us from confusion to understanding…” – Brian Greene

Properly done, Process FMEAs should improve manufacturing and assembly processes and corresponding process controls. This article describes how PFMEAs can be used to improve process controls, which are embodied in the Process Control Plan (PCP).

What is a Process Control Plan?

A Process Control Plan (PCP) is a document that provides a “summary description” of the methods used in the manufacturing environment to minimize variation and control product and process characteristics in order to ensure capability and stability of the manufacturing process. It is a structured approach for the design, selection and implementation of control methods, and reactions to problems with the manufacturing and assembly operations when they do occur.

How do Process FMEAs improve PCPs?

The Process FMEA is a key contributor to the effectiveness of the Process Control Plan. This linkage between the PFMEA and the PCP goes two ways:

The Process FMEA team includes representation from the manufacturing controls area, in order to ensure that the team considers all needed input from process controls as part of the analysis.

When the Process FMEA team identifies failure modes and associated causes that are not currently detected or controlled in PCPs or associated procedures, the PCP and procedures can be updated and improved, so all failure modes of concern are detected and controlled during manufacturing or assembly. Any changes to PCPs or procedures that come from the PFMEA should be included in the Process FMEA recommended actions.

Why enter PCP improvements in the Recommended Actions column of the FMEA?

As covered in a previous article, the short answer is everything that the FMEA team believes needs to be done differently from what is already planned or in place should go in the Recommended Actions column of the FMEA. The reason for this is the entries in the Recommended Actions column have additional information to facilitate the execution of the task that is recommended, such as the person who is responsible for the execution of the task, the target date when the task should be completed, and other project management information.

How does the PFMEA link to the PCP?

The following is a fictitious and simplified example of a Process Control Plan for wheel-spoke installation for the front wheels of a bicycle, excerpted from chapter 6 of the book Effective FMEAs.

We’ll start with the Process Flow Diagram (PFD) and link one of the process steps 1.2.6 to the PFMEA and the PCP.

Process Flow Diagram

Process Step 1.2.6: “Orient and place wheel spokes in wheel rim assembly fixture.”

Here is the corresponding PFMEA excerpt, showing the process function and a single failure mode and associated cause.

PFMEA example

In this example, we’ll use the following information from the PFD and the PFMEA to link with the PCP.

Process Function: “Orient and place wheel spokes in wheel rim assembly fixture.”
Significant Product Characteristic: “Correct number of wheel spokes.”
Significant Process Characteristic: “Correct kit of 36 spokes.”
Failure Mode: “Wheel spokes not in the correct orientation.”
Cause: “Fixture is not error-proofed to prevent incorrect orientation.”

The PFD and PFMEA can be linked to the PCP as follows:

1. The Process Function from the PFMEA (Orient and place wheel spokes in wheel rim assembly fixture) is entered in the “Process Name / Operation Description” of the PCP.

2. The Significant Product Characteristic in the Process Flow Diagram (Correct number of wheel spokes) is entered in the “Product” column of the PCP. Note, “Correct number of wheel spokes” is associated with the failure mode in the PFMEA.

3. The Significant Process Characteristic from the Process Flow Diagram (Correct kit of 36 spokes) is entered in the “Process” column of the PCP. Note, “Correct kit of 36 spokes” is associated with the cause in the PFMEA.

4. If there is an associated Significant Product Characteristic or Significant Process Characteristic in the DFMEA or PFMEA associated with the Failure mode / Cause, this is noted in the “Special Char.” column in the PCP.

5. The Current Process Controls from the PFMEA (Wheel spoke installation work instructions and Visual check of wheel assembly by an operator) are entered in the “Control Method” column of the PCP.

Process Control Plan example

The process control team can enter the remaining information into the PCP.

FMEA Tips

The Design FMEA can identify Key Product Characteristics (KPCs). KPCs are input to the Process FMEA and require follow-up in the Process Control Plan. They usually have their own approval process.

The Process FMEA can identify Key Control Characteristics (KCCs). Similar to KPCs, they require follow-up in the Process Control Plan.

When the Design FMEA team identifies and communicates KPCs to the Process FMEA team, this is one of the linkages between Design and Process FMEAs.

Summary

One of the objectives of Process FMEA is to improve the Process Control Plan. Following the suggestions in this article will help Process FMEA teams accomplish this purpose.

Next Article

FMEAs are intended to anticipate potential risk and develop actions that will reduce risk to acceptable levels. Is it possible to know and anticipate all of the potential risks? The next article takes up this important topic.

[display_form id=415]

Filed Under: Articles, Inside FMEA, on Tools & Techniques

About Carl S. Carlson

Carl S. Carlson is a consultant and instructor in the areas of FMEA, reliability program planning and other reliability engineering disciplines, supporting over one hundred clients from a wide cross-section of industries. He has 35 years of experience in reliability testing, engineering, and management positions, including senior consultant with ReliaSoft Corporation, and senior manager for the Advanced Reliability Group at General Motors.

« How Can CMMS Help You “Straighten” The P-F Curve
Why Do We Not Want Help? »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Articles by Carl Carlson
in the Inside FMEA series

[popup type="" link_text="Logo Info" ]

Information about FMEA Icon

Inside FMEA can be visually represented by a large tree, with roots, a solid trunk, branches, and leaves.

- The roots of the tree represent the philosophy and guiding principles for effective FMEAs.
- The solid trunk of the tree represents the fundamentals for all FMEAs.
- The branches represent the various FMEA applications.
- The leaves represent the valuable outcomes of FMEAs.
- This is intended to convey that each of the various FMEA applications have the same fundamentals and philosophical roots.

 

For example, the roots of the tree can represent following philosophy and guiding principles for effective FMEAs, such as:

1. Correct procedure         2. Lessons learned
3. Trained team                 4. Focus on prevention
5. Integrated with DFR    6. Skilled facilitation
7. Management support

The tree trunk represents the fundamentals of FMEA. All types of FMEA share common fundamentals, and these are essential to successful FMEA applications.

The tree branches can include the different types of FMEAs, including:

1. System FMEA         2. Design FMEA
3. Process FMEA        4. DRBFM
5. Hazard Analysis     6. RCM or Maintenance FMEA
7. Software FMEA      8. Other types of FMEA

The leaves of the tree branches represent individual FMEA projects, with a wide variety of FMEA scopes and results. [/popup]

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Posts

  • Gremlins today
  • The Power of Vision in Leadership and Organizational Success
  • 3 Types of MTBF Stories
  • ALT: An in Depth Description
  • Project Email Economics

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy