Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
    • About Us
    • Colophon
    • Survey
  • Reliability.fm
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • NoMTBF
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • ASQR&R
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Maintenance Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • RCM Blitz®
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Field Reliability Data Analysis
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability by Design
      • Reliability Competence
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
      • Reliability Knowledge
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Institute of Quality & Reliability
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Statistical Methods for Failure-Time Data
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Glossary
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinar Sources
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • Your Courses
    • Live Courses
      • Introduction to Reliability Engineering & Accelerated Testings Course Landing Page
      • Advanced Accelerated Testing Course Landing Page
    • Integral Concepts Courses
      • Reliability Analysis Methods Course Landing Page
      • Applied Reliability Analysis Course Landing Page
      • Statistics, Hypothesis Testing, & Regression Modeling Course Landing Page
      • Measurement System Assessment Course Landing Page
      • SPC & Process Capability Course Landing Page
      • Design of Experiments Course Landing Page
    • The Manufacturing Academy Courses
      • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Statistics
      • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
      • Quality Engineering Statistics
      • FMEA in Practice
      • Process Capability Analysis course
      • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
      • Return on Investment online course
    • Industrial Metallurgist Courses
    • FMEA courses Powered by The Luminous Group
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • How to be an Online Student
    • Quondam Courses
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home
  • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction Course Landing Page
  • Upcoming Live Events
You are here: Home / Articles / Using CMMS To Improve Your Safety Management

by Bryan Christiansen Leave a Comment

Using CMMS To Improve Your Safety Management

Using CMMS To Improve Your Safety Management

Equipment is described as reliable when it functions as designed without failure. Admittedly, equipment failure of any kind is quite inconvenient especially in fast-paced environments like the manufacturing sector. However, the consequences of failure – if it were to occur – go just beyond the usual inconveniences of unplanned downtime, lost productivity, lost revenue, etc. All these are bad enough, but should equipment failure cause injury or fatality, recovering from the consequences could become an uphill task.

Definitely, there is a valid connection between safety and reliability and optimized reliability and maintenance programs improve safety performance. But, the greater danger here is that a machine can function as designed yet be extremely unsafe to its operators and users under certain conditions. Especially in high-hazard environments like power and nuclear generation, employees can relate all too well with such situations.

So, what would cause a reliable asset to become so unsafe? For one thing, human error. Statistics indicate that in every 10 accidents, up to 9 of them could be due to human error. The same source shows that in both civil and military aviation, almost 70 percent of accidents result from human error. 

Coming back to the industrial workplace, our concern here is how to reduce your exposure to this risk. We believe that automating safety management in an organization will go a long way to close gaps in monitoring safety. 

Below, we discuss one such automation resource – computerized maintenance management system (CMMS) – and some ways that it helps to create an injury-free environment by guarding against the conditions that release hazards.

1) Adequate and Timely Maintenance 

Poorly executed maintenance and maintenance that is deferred for whatever reasons contribute to safety hazards, accidents, and the subsequent reputation damage that affected organizations will face. 

Funding issues aside, there are several reasons why maintenance may be delayed or poorly done. Most commonly they include:

  • a variety of scheduling mistakes
  • there are several clashes in the maintenance schedule
  • the required spare parts are out of stock 
  • instructions were not clear or were misinterpreted by the technician

In each of the situations mentioned above, if the required information for the maintenance activities had been logged in beforehand in a CMMS, it would eliminate many of these issues. 

A CMMS serves to centralize data around all of the assets in an organization, it organizes any related work requests and allows users to input step-by-step details and special work instructions, thereby leaving minimal room for confusion. 

This advantage is critical for speeding up maintenance and for better maintenance scheduling. 

2) Tracking Safety Risks 

If your facility is very busy or your operations span across several locations, it is not advisable to track safety risks manually.

Let’s paint a picture of what your workload would look like if you tried manual risk tracking:

  • hours, days, maybe even months spent sifting through historical health and safety-related reports
  • field service personnel would be out of sight and out of mind since you have little or no way to monitor their behavior at remote locations
  • no early warning alerts about high-risk equipment

But using a best-in-class CMMS will give you access to its exceptional safety monitoring abilities. For instance, you can access its reporting modules in seconds and get vital historical information about high-risk machines. With this information, it’s easier to pinpoint areas of improvement and preempt future occurrences.

In addition, when CMMS is integrated with predictive maintenance, it allows you to track unsafe conditions in machines and then generate early warning alerts so you conduct timely corrective maintenance. 

These alerts will give you some time to take action before the hazard is released. This benefit is invaluable in dangerous work environments as it often makes the difference between a near miss and a disastrous incident.

3) Standardizing Safety Policies and Procedures 

The U.K. Safety Regulatory Board, for instance, recognizes two main kinds of human failure:

  • Human error – an unintentional action or decision. This includes skill-based errors (such as memory lapses) and mistakes (rule-based and knowledge-based mistakes).
  • Violations – intentional failures. Deliberately doing the wrong thing. These can be routine, situational, or exceptional.

Types of human errors

But intentional or not, it doesn’t reduce the potential impact that any of these situations will have on the system and other workers. In this regard, an area that safety managers and other unit heads tend to struggle with is in the training of staff and being able to consistently give workers clear instructions for assigned tasks. The challenge is compounded where there is no standardization of instructions and procedures. 

You will find that even after several training sessions, workers will forget the exact details of what they learned or they may have difficulties with executing certain steps. Unfortunately, it often happens that rather than getting clarification, a technician may proceed to do what they “think” is right and cause major problems.

With a CMMS, you can reduce training time as well as improve workers’ access to information. It serves as a digital center where different kinds of documentation can be loaded, accessed, and updated even from remote locations. For example, you can upload generalized operating procedures and policies as well as specific instructions for particular assets along with safety requirements in the form of how-to videos, pictures, charts, etc.

This helps to establish and strengthen your processes as it makes information easier to understand and reduces your exposure to human error.

4) Automating Safety Audits 

Now that procedures have been standardized and everybody has access to information, it would be somewhat shortsighted to assume that this is enough for safety performance to improve. Remember that when your business has been running for long without any safety issue, the likelihood for complacency sets in. 

The responsibility for sustaining a safe workplace or plant rests with every staff from the management to the plant floor and one of the best ways to confirm that people are working safely is through routine safety audits.

Safety audits help to monitor compliance by serving as a reminder of the regulations. They are also useful for noticing any deviations so as to catch them in time. By combining audits with a CMMS, you get the following:

  • Safety Checklists. With a CMMS you can easily create and update checklists for any kind of equipment. The checklists allow you to input as much details as required and by using them , technicians can record any observations, update the records, and communicate any issues for further action. 
  • Evidence for Safety Compliance Inspections. Because CMMS captures extensive historical data, you can use it to record safety related issues such as interventions and procedures over time and present these records as evidence of compliance to regulatory bodies if need be. 
  • Scheduled Prompts for Physical inspections. You can schedule physical audits of the facility and what workers are doing and get reminders from the CMMS.

In Conclusion

Injuries to machine operators and technicians are quite common in manufacturing plants so it makes sense to update your maintenance and reliability programs with modern tools that deliver multiple benefits. Such tools, like a CMMS, ensure that while workers are protected, your physical assets are protected as well. 

Your business’s operations will be better off if you approach both safety and reliability as priorities. It’s a win-win situation for everyone.

Filed Under: Articles, CMMS and Reliability, on Maintenance Reliability Tagged With: CMMS, System safety management

About Bryan Christiansen

Bryan Christiansen is the founder and CEO at Limble CMMS. Limble is a modern, easy to use mobile CMMS software that takes the stress and chaos out of maintenance by helping managers organize, automate, and streamline their maintenance operations. While his primary experience is in software engineering, developing Limble required him to gain a deep understanding of the maintenance industry.

« CMMS Long Description Text
How To Break the Vicious Circle of Reactive Maintenance? »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Articles by Bryan Christiansen
in the CMMS and Reliability series

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Posts

  • Gremlins today
  • The Power of Vision in Leadership and Organizational Success
  • 3 Types of MTBF Stories
  • ALT: An in Depth Description
  • Project Email Economics

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy