Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
    • About Us
    • Colophon
    • Survey
  • Reliability.fm
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • NoMTBF
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • ASQR&R
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Maintenance Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • RCM Blitz®
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Field Reliability Data Analysis
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability by Design
      • Reliability Competence
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
      • Reliability Knowledge
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Institute of Quality & Reliability
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Statistical Methods for Failure-Time Data
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Glossary
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinar Sources
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • Your Courses
    • Live Courses
      • Introduction to Reliability Engineering & Accelerated Testings Course Landing Page
      • Advanced Accelerated Testing Course Landing Page
    • Integral Concepts Courses
      • Reliability Analysis Methods Course Landing Page
      • Applied Reliability Analysis Course Landing Page
      • Statistics, Hypothesis Testing, & Regression Modeling Course Landing Page
      • Measurement System Assessment Course Landing Page
      • SPC & Process Capability Course Landing Page
      • Design of Experiments Course Landing Page
    • The Manufacturing Academy Courses
      • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Statistics
      • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
      • Quality Engineering Statistics
      • FMEA in Practice
      • Process Capability Analysis course
      • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
      • Return on Investment online course
    • Industrial Metallurgist Courses
    • FMEA courses Powered by The Luminous Group
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • How to be an Online Student
    • Quondam Courses
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home
  • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction Course Landing Page
  • Upcoming Live Events
You are here: Home / Articles / Understanding the ‘Risk Management’ Process

by Greg Hutchins Leave a Comment

Understanding the ‘Risk Management’ Process

Understanding the ‘Risk Management’ Process

Guest Post by Robert Pojasek (first posted on CERM ® RISK INSIGHTS – reposted here with permission)

There are two widely-used risk management standards:

  • ISO 31000:2018
  • COSO ERM 2017

In my previous blog[i], I presented details on how these risk management standards address the development of a risk-aware culture – a necessary foundation for risk management success. As promised, this blog will address the risk management “process.” This is how the organization addresses specific risks.

ISO 31000:2018 Risk Management Process[ii]

This international standard creates three interrelated risk management process activities:

  • Develop the Scope, Context, Criteria
  • Conduct the Risk Assessment
  • Address the Risk Treatment (COSO ERM calls this Risk Response)

The ISO 31000 risk management process is often described as the systematic application of policies, procedures and practices to the activities of communicating and consulting, establishing the context and assessing, treating, monitoring, reviewing, recording and reporting risk. This risk management process dates back to 1995 with the release of the first risk management standard – AS/NZS 4360:1995.

It is important to have the risk management process be an integral part of management and decision-making.  This process needs to be integrated into the structure, operations, and processes of the organization.  It is NOT a “stand-alone” process!

The ISO 31000 risk management process has many applications within an organization since it is customized to achieve objectives and to address the risks in the external and internal context in which they are applied.

COSO ERM:2017[iii]

The component of the COSO ERM framework that deals with the risk management process can be found in the “performance” section (Component 8).  Entities use a process that:

  • Identifies new and emerging risks so that management can deploy risk responses in a timely manner
  • Assesses the severity of risk, with an understanding of how the risk may change depending on the level of the entity
  • Prioritizes risk, allowing management to optimize the allocation of resources in response to those risks
  • Identifies and selects responses to risk (both opportunities and threats)
  • Develops a portfolio view to enhance the ability for the entity to articulate the amount of risk assumed in pursuit of the strategy and business objectives.

As in the case of the ISO 31000 process, the practices in the COSO ERM are interactive, with the inputs in one step of the process being the outputs of the previous step.

Comparison of Risk Management Processes

The focus of the ISO 31000:2018 risk management process is focused on an ‘organizational development’ theme common to the ISO management system standards.  This risk management process will work quite well with other ISO management system standards used by the organization. It is also preferred in nonfinancial situations.

COSO ERM 2017 is business focused and tied to the entity’s strategy.  This is clearly stated in the introduction to the standard:

“The diligence required to integrate enterprise risk management provides an entity with a clear path to creating, preserving, and realizing value.”

COSO ERM 2017 is preferred in publicly traded entities and in financial entities.

There is a lot of consistency noted when comparing these approaches to risk management ‘process.’

Once Again, It’s Your Choice

You can use either standard or create a hybrid standard for your organization.  Both standards see risk as both opportunities and threats. Make sure you are using a method that supports this[iv]. We’ll look at two risk management “frameworks” in the next blog.

[i] http://insights.cermacademy.com/2018/09/216-creating-risk-aware-culture-bob-pojasek/

[ii] https://www.iso.org/obp/ui#iso:std:iso:31000:ed-2:v1:en

[iii][iii] https://www.coso.org/Documents/2017-COSO-ERM-Integrating-with-Strategy-and-Performance-Executive-Summary.pdf

[iv] http://tiny.cc/xz3fhy

Bio:

Robert B. Pojasek, Ph.D.
Harvard University & Pojasek & Associates LLC
Risk Management & Organizational Sustainability
rpojasek@sprynet.com
(781) 777-1858  Office
(617) 401-5708  Mobile & Text
www.linkedin.com/in/bobpojasek
Organizational Risk Management and Sustainability:
A Practical Step-by-Step Guide
Now available as an e-book
http://tiny.cc/xz3fhy

Also available as an online action learning course

http://tiny.cc/y23fhy

Expert as environment, health & safety, and sustainability professional with a record of providing leadership, training and operational support to all levels of the organization; Implements new and revised management systems to drive EHS/sustainability program conformance throughout the operation; Integrates organizational systems of management using the ISO harmonized high-level structure; Provides support for organizations implementing sustainability/risk management practices featured in my book.

Filed Under: Articles, CERM® Risk Insights, on Risk & Safety

About Greg Hutchins

Greg Hutchins PE CERM is the evangelist of Future of Quality: Risk®. He has been involved in quality since 1985 when he set up the first quality program in North America based on Mil Q 9858 for the natural gas industry. Mil Q became ISO 9001 in 1987

He is the author of more than 30 books. ISO 31000: ERM is the best-selling and highest-rated ISO risk book on Amazon (4.8 stars). Value Added Auditing (4th edition) is the first ISO risk-based auditing book.

« Non obvious DOE applications – Running
Is Your PM Worth Doing? Use a PM Cost Benefit Analysis to Find Out »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

CERM® Risk Insights series Article by Greg Hutchins, Editor and noted guest authors

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Articles

  • Gremlins today
  • The Power of Vision in Leadership and Organizational Success
  • 3 Types of MTBF Stories
  • ALT: An in Depth Description
  • Project Email Economics

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy