Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
    • About Us
    • Colophon
    • Survey
  • Reliability.fm
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • NoMTBF
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • ASQR&R
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Maintenance Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • RCM Blitz®
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Field Reliability Data Analysis
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability by Design
      • Reliability Competence
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
      • Reliability Knowledge
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Institute of Quality & Reliability
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Statistical Methods for Failure-Time Data
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Glossary
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinar Sources
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • Your Courses
    • Live Courses
      • Introduction to Reliability Engineering & Accelerated Testings Course Landing Page
      • Advanced Accelerated Testing Course Landing Page
    • Integral Concepts Courses
      • Reliability Analysis Methods Course Landing Page
      • Applied Reliability Analysis Course Landing Page
      • Statistics, Hypothesis Testing, & Regression Modeling Course Landing Page
      • Measurement System Assessment Course Landing Page
      • SPC & Process Capability Course Landing Page
      • Design of Experiments Course Landing Page
    • The Manufacturing Academy Courses
      • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Statistics
      • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
      • Quality Engineering Statistics
      • FMEA in Practice
      • Process Capability Analysis course
      • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
      • Return on Investment online course
    • Industrial Metallurgist Courses
    • FMEA courses Powered by The Luminous Group
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • How to be an Online Student
    • Quondam Courses
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home
  • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction Course Landing Page
  • Upcoming Live Events
You are here: Home / Articles / on Maintenance Reliability / AI & Predictive Maintenance / Understanding Remaining Useful Life (RUL) with the P-F Curve

by Arun Gowtham Leave a Comment

Understanding Remaining Useful Life (RUL) with the P-F Curve

Understanding Remaining Useful Life (RUL) with the P-F Curve

Recently, there has been an influx of Industry 4.0 companies promising their product/application would help predict the Remaining Useful Life (RUL) of a physical asset. Each uses a mix of machine learning algorithms to estimate the RUL based on the data available. This is their value proposition. But what is this ‘life’?

P-F Curve

Maintenance & Reliability Professionals are familiar with the P-F Curve. It’s the graphic representation of an item’s Resistance to Failure against Time. The curve says two things: 1) Each failure is preceded by a symptom; 2) Resistance degrades over time. The point where the symptom of an impending failure is observed is called Potential Failure and the point where the resistance becomes unsatisfactory is called Functional Failure. The time interval between these points is the P-F Interval.

The versatility of the P-F Curve enables it to capture the behavior of all the known asset failure patterns. Even if an asset exhibits infant mortality or a constant failure rate pattern, they can be represented in a P-F Curve because the asset will show some symptom of impending failure before the actual failure. In the extremely rare case of no indication & a snap failure, the P-F Curve is drawn as a short steep curve with the P and F points very close. Regardless of the curve shapes, the Functional Failure is the point of failure (or unsatisfactory performance) and hence the total time taken for the asset to reach this point is its ‘Useful Life’. In other words, it’s the time for which the asset will perform its function satisfactorily.

Remaining Useful Life

If we measure the useful life left from a different point along the curve instead of the beginning, then we get the ‘Remaining Useful Life’ from that time. Let’s say you have an asset that has been running for 6 months, and you want to know how many more months it will function without failure. You get this by measuring the time between now (t) and the Functional Failure. Observation point can be anywhere; if it is at the potential failure point then RUL is same as P-F Interval.

Calculating RUL with algorithms

Predictive algorithms, used by Industry 4.0 apps, will generalize the system data to fit into these curves and measure the time to functional failure. Since the historical data contains variations (from conditions, design, and operations), each point on the curve is a probability distribution (pdf). i.e., the same P-F Curve when repeated will exhibit a distribution of curves. Because of this, the Functional failure point is also a distribution. Evidently, measuring the time between two distributions will also give a distribution. Hence, we have the Remaining Useful Life of an asset as a range of values with a probability of occurrence. 

Predictions carry uncertainty with it and the curves above show how the uncertainty is quantified. One advantage of the algorithms is that as time progresses and more data is fed, the uncertainty reduces. So, the RUL estimation will be more uncertain at the beginning of asset life and will get certain as the asset reaches its functional failure. To avoid reporting distributions, use the median of the RUL distribution to denote the RUL as a singular value. Given this interpretation, we can finally define:

“Remaining Useful Life (RUL) is a probabilistic estimate of the time period until which the asset will continue to perform its intended function under stated conditions”

Estimating RUL with high accuracy is just the first part. Maintenance Work must leverage this information with other factors to tie-in with the broader framework to effectively manage assets.

Learn more about how you can predict RUL for critical assets at your firm & prevent unplanned downtime by Contacting us.

Filed Under: AI & Predictive Maintenance, Articles, on Maintenance Reliability

About Arun Gowtham

Arun Gowtham is the Founder/Lead Reliability Engineer at Owtrun. He works on accelerating the adoption of digital tools to support Reliability Engineers. Writes about all things Reliability, AI/ML, and Project Management.

« Easy Way to See Your Hidden Factory
How Safety Training Can Benefit From Avatar 4D »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

AI & Predictive Maintenance logo Photo of Arun GowthamArticles by Arun Gowtham
in the AI & Predictive Maintenance article series

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Posts

  • Gremlins today
  • The Power of Vision in Leadership and Organizational Success
  • 3 Types of MTBF Stories
  • ALT: An in Depth Description
  • Project Email Economics

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy