Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
    • About Us
    • Colophon
    • Survey
  • Reliability.fm
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • NoMTBF
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • ASQR&R
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Maintenance Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • RCM Blitz®
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Field Reliability Data Analysis
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability by Design
      • Reliability Competence
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
      • Reliability Knowledge
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Institute of Quality & Reliability
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Statistical Methods for Failure-Time Data
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Glossary
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinar Sources
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • Your Courses
    • Live Courses
      • Introduction to Reliability Engineering & Accelerated Testings Course Landing Page
      • Advanced Accelerated Testing Course Landing Page
    • Integral Concepts Courses
      • Reliability Analysis Methods Course Landing Page
      • Applied Reliability Analysis Course Landing Page
      • Statistics, Hypothesis Testing, & Regression Modeling Course Landing Page
      • Measurement System Assessment Course Landing Page
      • SPC & Process Capability Course Landing Page
      • Design of Experiments Course Landing Page
    • The Manufacturing Academy Courses
      • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Statistics
      • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
      • Quality Engineering Statistics
      • FMEA in Practice
      • Process Capability Analysis course
      • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
      • Return on Investment online course
    • Industrial Metallurgist Courses
    • FMEA courses Powered by The Luminous Group
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • How to be an Online Student
    • Quondam Courses
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home
  • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction Course Landing Page
  • Upcoming Live Events
You are here: Home / Articles / Two Ways to Get High System Reliability

by Mike Sondalini Leave a Comment

Two Ways to Get High System Reliability

Two Ways to Get High System Reliability

There are only two ways to get high system reliability if you want a highly reliable system. Equipment in an operation can be configured in series or in parallel. In series, one item connects sequentially to the other. In parallel, each item is arranged as a companion, where one duplicates the other.

A series arrangement needs exceptionally reliable individual equipment to get a highly reliable system. A parallel arrangement can form a highly reliable system even if individual equipment has poor reliability.

Slide 30 – When You Want A Highly Reliable System You Only Have Two Options to Choose from to Get High System Reliability. Slide shows example configurations and formulas for series and parallel high reliability systems.
Slide 30 – When You Want A Highly Reliable System You Only Have Two Options to Choose from to Get High System Reliability

It takes just one item to fail in a series arrangement and the whole system is failed. Each individual item must be exceptional reliable when equipment is configured in series to get a highly reliable system. That is not the case when equipment is arranged in a parallel redundancy.

A system is formed when equipment is combined to do a duty. When the pump, coupling, and electric motor in the image above are connected they form a series system used to move liquid through pipes from one point to another. The reliability of the whole system depends on the reliability of each item. When one item fails—be it the pump, or coupling, or motor—the whole system stops and no liquid flows.

Series System Reliability

The Reliability Block Diagram for a series arrangement is shown at the top of the slide. The upper equation in the slide is used to calculate the series system reliability. The reliability of a series system is the multiplication of the reliability each individual item in the system. The upper table in the slide shows an example calculation for two items in series were each has a reliability of 0.95. Reliability is the chance of success, so 0.95 reliability means that in every hundred uses the item fails to complete its duty five times—a 5% chance of failure and 95% chance of success.

When both items of 0.95 reliability must work together as a system, the system reliability is only 0.9. When you put 10 items that are each 0.95 reliable in series the system reliability is but 0.6. That is an atrocious system reliability. Series system reliability falls when you include more equipment because each time you add an item into the series it brings with it more opportunities for things to go wrong that stop the system working.

To create a highly reliable system each item in it must be far more reliable. You can see the effect on system reliability as individual item reliability rises in the top table on the slide. The far right-hand column in the upper table shows the system reliability if each item was 0.9999 reliable, i.e. it fails once in every 10,000 uses. When 10 items of that reliability form a series system, the system reliability is 0.999, or one failure in every thousand times the system is used. Each item in a ten-item series system needs to be at least ten times more reliable, i.e. 0.9999, than the whole system to get a system that is 0.999 reliable.

Parallel System Reliability

The other way to combine equipment is as a parallel system arrangement. In the lower image on the slide you see two filter stations in parallel.

They can be configured to work in one of two ways. One is the duty circuit taking the full service, and the other is the standby doing no work, but ready to come online when the duty goes offline—this is known as a duty and standby configuration, or a standby redundancy.

The other arrangement is where both circuits operate together and share the service load, and if one circuit goes offline the remaining circuit can handle the full duty. This operating philosophy is called a fully active arrangement. The lower table shows when two systems of 0.6 reliability are paralleled in a fully active arrangement the system reliability is 0.84. When six separate systems of 0.6 reliability are paralleled, the system reliability is 0.996. By putting equipment in parallel you create a more reliable system because when one item fails the other item continues delivering the duty.

Getting a Highly Reliable System

When you use equipment there are only two ways to get high system reliability. If it’s a series system, then every piece of equipment in the arrangement must exceptionally reliable. The other way is to duplicate the system and have a complete second system in parallel ready to replace the first system when it fails.

Filed Under: Articles, on Maintenance Reliability, Plant Maintenance

About Mike Sondalini

In engineering and maintenance since 1974, Mike’s career extends across original equipment manufacturing, beverage processing and packaging, steel fabrication, chemical processing and manufacturing, quality management, project management, enterprise asset management, plant and equipment maintenance, and maintenance training. His specialty is helping companies build highly effective operational risk management processes, develop enterprise asset management systems for ultra-high reliable assets, and instil the precision maintenance skills needed for world class equipment reliability.

« Differences Between Change and Transformation
How to Compel Uncertainty to Respond (and Strengthen Communication) »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Article by
Mike Sondalini
in the
Plant Maintenance series.

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Articles

  • Gremlins today
  • The Power of Vision in Leadership and Organizational Success
  • 3 Types of MTBF Stories
  • ALT: An in Depth Description
  • Project Email Economics

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy