Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
    • About Us
    • Colophon
    • Survey
  • Reliability.fm
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • NoMTBF
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • ASQR&R
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Maintenance Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • RCM Blitz®
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Field Reliability Data Analysis
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability by Design
      • Reliability Competence
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
      • Reliability Knowledge
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Institute of Quality & Reliability
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Statistical Methods for Failure-Time Data
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Glossary
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinar Sources
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • Your Courses
    • Live Courses
      • Introduction to Reliability Engineering & Accelerated Testings Course Landing Page
      • Advanced Accelerated Testing Course Landing Page
    • Integral Concepts Courses
      • Reliability Analysis Methods Course Landing Page
      • Applied Reliability Analysis Course Landing Page
      • Statistics, Hypothesis Testing, & Regression Modeling Course Landing Page
      • Measurement System Assessment Course Landing Page
      • SPC & Process Capability Course Landing Page
      • Design of Experiments Course Landing Page
    • The Manufacturing Academy Courses
      • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Statistics
      • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
      • Quality Engineering Statistics
      • FMEA in Practice
      • Process Capability Analysis course
      • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
      • Return on Investment online course
    • Industrial Metallurgist Courses
    • FMEA courses Powered by The Luminous Group
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • How to be an Online Student
    • Quondam Courses
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home
  • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction Course Landing Page
  • Upcoming Live Events
You are here: Home / Articles / Two Birds with One Stone

by Fred Schenkelberg 6 Comments

Two Birds with One Stone

Two Birds with One Stone

Just back from a trip to Patagonia and catching up with emails and writing this morning. Posting an article for this list is due today along with a touch of travel weariness, decided to share a part of a question received concerning data analysis.

My thought is to post an actual question one of our peers is facing, and meet the deadline for this post.

The Question

Rafael asked about the analysis of an experiment that included 8 failures out of 10 samples. He wrote, in part:

I’m testing 10 devices (non-repairable system) over e.g. 400 hrs.
Recorded failure times in hrs: {30, 45, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, 300}, 2 devices survived.

Let’s assume the two censored devices ran for 400 hours.

How would you report the results of this experiment?

Other Questions to Consider

When I first looked at this request, I wondered what was important. Not knowing the constraints or goals it’s hard to judge if this was a successful experiment or not. Did it provide meaningful information?

In short, what else do you need to know to properly interpret this data? Not just about the experiment or failures; what else do you need to know about the business, the technology or the customer use conditions?

It’s not a lot of data, post in the comments section how you would approach the analysis, your results that you would report, and what other information you would like to know given this experiment.

While not in the format of a CRE exam question, this simple example could become many different questions concerning data analysis, test design, management, etc.

Interested in an Upcoming CRE Preparation Course

Last January we ran a pilot version of a self-paced online CRE Preparation course.

A dozen people signed up and I’ve been gathering inputs, improvement ideas, and working to make the course as useful and effective as possible.

I’ll open the course again in June for registration for those preparing for the October exam date. If you would like to learn more about the course and details about when you can register, please visit the course page on Accendo Reliability. Sign up for the interested in the course list to get a few sneak peeks, more information and details about the course, and be the first to receive an invitation to joint the course.

Also, let me know what you are looking for in online courses not only for preparation or the CRE exam; also for your day to day work.

What do you want to know more about? What elements of reliability engineering do you struggle with that a course may help you master?


 

Related:

life testing question (article)

First 5 Questions (article)

Second 5 Questions (article)

 

Filed Under: Articles, CRE Preparation Notes, Reliability Testing Tagged With: Data analysis

About Fred Schenkelberg

I am the reliability expert at FMS Reliability, a reliability engineering and management consulting firm I founded in 2004. I left Hewlett Packard (HP)’s Reliability Team, where I helped create a culture of reliability across the corporation, to assist other organizations.

« Life Cycle Costs
What Can One Reliability Engineer Do? »

Comments

  1. Michael H. Smith says

    March 28, 2016 at 9:25 AM

    You need to know everything involved on the design criteria, specifications (e.g. operating parameters, environmental conditions, functions, margins etc), use cases etc. Just about all information you can obtain.

    Reply
    • Fred Schenkelberg says

      March 28, 2016 at 9:34 AM

      Hi Michael, for the analysis of this test data, what is essential for you to create a meaningful report? Sure, it would be nice to know everything, yet what specifically do you need in this case? What questions would you ask, what information would you see, and why? cheers, Fred

      Reply
  2. Tim says

    March 30, 2016 at 12:37 AM

    First question, do the failures all have the same failure mechanism?

    Reply
    • Fred Schenkelberg says

      March 30, 2016 at 6:53 AM

      Good question – how would it change your analysis, Tim?

      Reply
      • Tim says

        April 7, 2016 at 7:27 AM

        Group the problems with the same failure mechanism. Before analyse them.

        Reply
  3. Fred Schenkelberg says

    April 7, 2016 at 8:52 AM

    Thanks Tim, grouping based on failure mechanisms is a good practice…. and helpful for fruitful data analysis. cheers, Fred

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

CRE Preparation Notes

Article by Fred Schenkelberg

Join Accendo

Join our members-only community for full access to exclusive eBooks, webinars, training, and more.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Get Full Site Access

Not ready to join?
Stay current on new articles, podcasts, webinars, courses and more added to the Accendo Reliability website each week.
No membership required to subscribe.

[popup type="" link_text="Get Weekly Email Updates" link_class="button" ][display_form id=266][/popup]

  • CRE Preparation Notes
  • CRE Prep
  • Reliability Management
  • Probability and Statistics for Reliability
  • Reliability in Design and Development
  • Reliability Modeling and Predictions
  • Reliability Testing
  • Maintainability and Availability
  • Data Collection and Use

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy