Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
    • About Us
    • Colophon
    • Survey
  • Reliability.fm
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • NoMTBF
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • ASQR&R
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Maintenance Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • RCM Blitz®
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Field Reliability Data Analysis
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability by Design
      • Reliability Competence
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
      • Reliability Knowledge
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Institute of Quality & Reliability
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Statistical Methods for Failure-Time Data
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Glossary
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinar Sources
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • Your Courses
    • Live Courses
      • Introduction to Reliability Engineering & Accelerated Testings Course Landing Page
      • Advanced Accelerated Testing Course Landing Page
    • Integral Concepts Courses
      • Reliability Analysis Methods Course Landing Page
      • Applied Reliability Analysis Course Landing Page
      • Statistics, Hypothesis Testing, & Regression Modeling Course Landing Page
      • Measurement System Assessment Course Landing Page
      • SPC & Process Capability Course Landing Page
      • Design of Experiments Course Landing Page
    • The Manufacturing Academy Courses
      • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Statistics
      • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
      • Quality Engineering Statistics
      • FMEA in Practice
      • Process Capability Analysis course
      • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
      • Return on Investment online course
    • Industrial Metallurgist Courses
    • FMEA courses Powered by The Luminous Group
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • How to be an Online Student
    • Quondam Courses
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home
  • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction Course Landing Page
  • Upcoming Live Events
You are here: Home / Articles / Two Pumps Problem

by Fred Schenkelberg 3 Comments

Two Pumps Problem

Two Pumps Problem

Let’s say we have two identical pumps share a load in parallel. The failure rate for a pump in this mode of operation is 0.0002 failures per hour. If one pump has to carry the full load alone, that pumps failure rate increases to 0.0009 failures per hour.

What is the reliability of the two pump system over a 168 hour week of operation?

The solution is not the simple two units in parallel as the change from shared load to full load on one unit also changes the expected failure rate. The approach is to consider the time to failure for the shared load units, then if one fails, the remaining time is under a higher load and higher failure rate.

According to Dr. Kececioglu, Reliability Engineering Handbook, volume 2, page 147, in general this can be written as

$$ \large\displaystyle R(t)={{R}_{1}}(t){{R}_{2}}(t)+{{Q}_{1}}({{t}_{1}}){{R}_{2}}({{t}_{1}}){{R}_{{{2}’}}}[{{t}_{1e}},(t-{{t}_{1}})]+{{Q}_{2}}({{t}_{2}}){{R}_{1}}({{t}_{2}}){{R}_{{{1}’}}}[{{t}_{2e}},(t-{{t}_{2}})]$$

where the prime elements are the change in reliability expectation due to the change in load. Also, t1 is the variable time to failure of unit 1 and is 0 ≤ t1 ≤ t, likewise for t2.

When the failure rates are described by the exponential distribution the above equation becomes

$$ \large\displaystyle R(t)={{e}^{-{{\lambda }_{1}}t}}{{e}^{-{{\lambda }_{2}}t}}+\int_{0}^{t}{{{\lambda }_{1}}}{{e}^{-{{\lambda }_{1}}{{t}_{1}}}}{{e}^{-{{\lambda }_{2}}{{t}_{1}}}}{{e}^{-{{{{\lambda }’}}_{2}}(t-{{t}_{1}})}}d{{t}_{1}}+\int_{0}^{t}{{{\lambda }_{2}}}{{e}^{-{{\lambda }_{2}}{{t}_{2}}}}{{e}^{-\lambda 1{{t}_{2}}}}{{e}^{-{{{{\lambda }’}}_{1}}(t-{{t}_{2}})}}d{{t}_{2}}$$

Which integrates to

$$ \large\displaystyle R(t)={{e}^{-({{\lambda }_{1}}+{{\lambda }_{2}})t}}\left( 1-\frac{{{\lambda }_{1}}}{{{\lambda }_{1}}+{{\lambda }_{2}}-{{\lambda }_{2}}^{\prime }}-\frac{{{\lambda }_{2}}}{{{\lambda }_{1}}+{{\lambda }_{2}}-{{\lambda }_{1}}^{\prime }} \right)+\frac{{{\lambda }_{1}}{{e}^{-{{\lambda }_{2}}^{\prime }t}}}{{{\lambda }_{1}}+{{\lambda }_{2}}-{{\lambda }_{2}}^{\prime }}+\frac{{{\lambda }_{2}}{{e}^{-{{\lambda }_{1}}^{\prime }t}}}{{{\lambda }_{1}}+{{\lambda }_{2}}-{{\lambda }_{1}}^{\prime }}$$

And if the two units are identical then

$$ \large\displaystyle {{\lambda }_{1}}={{\lambda }_{2}}={{\lambda }_{{}}}\text{ and }{{\lambda }_{1}}^{\prime }={{\lambda }_{2}}^{\prime }={\lambda }’$$

and the above reduces to

$$ \large\displaystyle R(t)={{e}^{-2\lambda t}}+\frac{2\lambda }{{\lambda }’-2\lambda }\left( {{e}^{-2\lambda t}}-{{e}^{-{\lambda }’t}} \right)$$

Note that the change in failure rate cannot equal two times the original rate else the formula divides by zero. In this special case, there is a solution, and let’s leave that for an exercise for the interested student. Yet, for the stated problem we can solve for the reliability at time t.

$$ \large\displaystyle R(168)={{e}^{-2\times 0.0002\times 168}}+\frac{2\times 0.0002}{0.0009-2\times 0.0002}\left( {{e}^{-2\times 0.0002\times 168}}-{{e}^{-0.0009\times 168}} \right)$$

$- R(168)=0.935+(0.8)(0.935-0.860)=0.995 -$


Related:

Standby Redundancy, Equal Failure Rates, Imperfect Switching (article)

Standby Redundancy with Equal Failure Rates and Perfect Switching (article)

Exponential Reliability (article)

 

Filed Under: Articles, CRE Preparation Notes, Reliability Modeling and Predictions Tagged With: Failure Rate, Reliability Block Diagram (RBD)

About Fred Schenkelberg

I am the reliability expert at FMS Reliability, a reliability engineering and management consulting firm I founded in 2004. I left Hewlett Packard (HP)’s Reliability Team, where I helped create a culture of reliability across the corporation, to assist other organizations.

« AQL decision
Root Cause Knowledge and Models »

Comments

  1. Mark Powell says

    September 23, 2012 at 7:25 AM

    Fred,

    This answer is completely spurious since it requires use of the exponential distribution for everything. Neither of these pumps will fail with the exponential model.

    Mark Powell

    Reply
    • Fred Schenkelberg says

      September 23, 2012 at 7:44 AM

      And, recall that this forum is for those preparing for the ASQ CRE exam – which often includes such quickly solvable problems assuming exponential distribution. While you certainly know of my dislike for anything assumed constant, when presented with a problem that has only failure rate (not including a time related function) then the answer is the best we have at the moment.

      I agree, in practice, I would look for the appropriate function or relationship that describes the rate of change of failure rate. Maybe I should have used a restaurant example. When both waitresses are working then each have a 0.0002 broken ceramic mugs per hour failure rate, when one is covering for the other during a break (covering all tables), then the failure rate jumps to 0.0009. How many mugs should I plan to buy each week? Same basic problem, yet, maybe only slightly more matched to the failure mechanism.

      Thanks for the comments – and for those wanting to know more about my thoughts related to assuming the exponential distribution (and MTBF) see http://nomtbf.com/

      cheers,

      Fred

      Reply
      • Mark Powell says

        September 25, 2012 at 7:19 AM

        Fred,

        Sorry, I missed the “CRE Prep” part. I try to avoid commenting when I see that.

        But this does raise an issue about CRE certification (and just about every other certification process I know of (PMP, CSEP, CSP, etc.). To pass the exam, you have to learn to do a lot of things that you really should not do (and have to “unlearn”) in practice. For most of these certifying institutions, it takes forever if it is even possible to change the established body of knowledge to change the exams to reflect the practices we actually need to use.

        I don’t know what the answer is, but I have become extremely wary of anyone who touts their certs as any sort of qualification for a job.

        Sorry for that post.

        Mark Powell

        Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

CRE Preparation Notes

Article by Fred Schenkelberg

Join Accendo

Join our members-only community for full access to exclusive eBooks, webinars, training, and more.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Get Full Site Access

Not ready to join?
Stay current on new articles, podcasts, webinars, courses and more added to the Accendo Reliability website each week.
No membership required to subscribe.

[popup type="" link_text="Get Weekly Email Updates" link_class="button" ][display_form id=266][/popup]

  • CRE Preparation Notes
  • CRE Prep
  • Reliability Management
  • Probability and Statistics for Reliability
  • Reliability in Design and Development
  • Reliability Modeling and Predictions
  • Reliability Testing
  • Maintainability and Availability
  • Data Collection and Use

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy