Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
    • About Us
    • Colophon
    • Survey
  • Reliability.fm
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • NoMTBF
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • ASQR&R
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Maintenance Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • RCM Blitz®
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Field Reliability Data Analysis
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability by Design
      • Reliability Competence
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
      • Reliability Knowledge
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Institute of Quality & Reliability
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Statistical Methods for Failure-Time Data
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Glossary
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinar Sources
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • Your Courses
    • Live Courses
      • Introduction to Reliability Engineering & Accelerated Testings Course Landing Page
      • Advanced Accelerated Testing Course Landing Page
    • Integral Concepts Courses
      • Reliability Analysis Methods Course Landing Page
      • Applied Reliability Analysis Course Landing Page
      • Statistics, Hypothesis Testing, & Regression Modeling Course Landing Page
      • Measurement System Assessment Course Landing Page
      • SPC & Process Capability Course Landing Page
      • Design of Experiments Course Landing Page
    • The Manufacturing Academy Courses
      • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Statistics
      • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
      • Quality Engineering Statistics
      • FMEA in Practice
      • Process Capability Analysis course
      • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
      • Return on Investment online course
    • Industrial Metallurgist Courses
    • FMEA courses Powered by The Luminous Group
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • How to be an Online Student
    • Quondam Courses
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home
  • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction Course Landing Page
  • Upcoming Live Events
You are here: Home / Articles / The True Importance of Reliability Block Diagrams

by Fred Schenkelberg Leave a Comment

The True Importance of Reliability Block Diagrams

The True Importance of Reliability Block Diagrams

A reliability block diagram is a graphical and statistical representation of the reliability structure of a system.

Graphical as an RBD is drawn with blocks for each element of a system and connecting lines representing the relationship between elements.

Statistical as an RBD also contains the probability of success (reliability) information for each block. For a single point in time, say the warranty period, the probability may be a single number. The probability of success could also be reliability function based on a distribution or non-parametric model.

Let’s consider a simple series system and its RBD. Say the system has three elements, A, B, and C, and if any one element fails the system fails. Thus if A or B or C fail, the system fails. Given this structure we can multiply the individual reliability together to estimate the system reliability, assuming the elements probability of failure is independent.

$$ \displaystyle\large P\left( A \right)\bigcup P\left( B \right)\bigcup P\left( C \right)\Rightarrow R\left( A \right)R\left( B \right)R\left( C \right)={{R}_{system}}$$

This implies that whichever element is most likely to fail limits the overall system reliability. Let’s say element A is at 80% reliability and the other two elements are both at 90% reliable at one year. The system reliability in this case is 0.8 x 0.9 x 0.9 = 0.648 or 64.8% reliable at one year. The system reliability of a series system will always be less than the least reliable element.

Most reliability books and sites online have more details on creating RBDs.

Improvement Strategy

Product development teams have limited resources.

Given limits of money, time, etc. Where should the team invest to improve the system reliability? Let’s explore two options. First, let’s improve element A, the least reliable, from 80% to 85%. Second, consider improving element B from 90% to 95%.

In the first case the system reliability changes from 64.8% to 0.85 x 0.90 x 0.90 = 0.6885, just a little more than 4% improvement. In the second case the system reliability changes from 64.8% to 0.80 x 0.95 x 0.90 = 0.684 or 68.4% which is a little less than a 4% improvement. If the cost of improvements is the same in both cases we would benefit the most by improving the least reliable element.

Another consideration, no matter how much the elements B and C improve the system reliability will not be more than the lowest element’s reliability. Even if B and C have perfect reliability, 1, the system reliability will be 0.85 x 1.0 x 1.0 = 0.85.

Improving the weakest element provides the best opportunity for system reliability improvements in most cases.

The Power of RBD

RBDs are just models and alone have very little utility. Customers will not buy the RBD, but they will buy your product if it’s reliable. So, how should you make use of the RBD to meet your customers and business objectives?

The benefit of an RBD is it encourages two things to occur:

First, it encourages identification and improvement of the weakest element of a system. Second, it encourages improvements in the reliability estimates used for the model.

Both benefits focus the team on improving the product both by taking action to improve the weakest elements and to improve the accuracy of reliability estimates. If the RBD does nothing other than providing a common focal point for the team to discuss system reliability, then it has served some use.

Reliability occurs at the point of decision.

Improving the team’s ability to make a good decision concerning reliability is one of the primary goals of any reliability program. The RBD tool provides a common place to compare the reliability of a system’s elements. It provides a platform for cost/benefit trade-off considerations. It provides a framework to determine the allocation of resources. Even a simple RBD enables the team to discuss reliability in a meaningful manner.

Filed Under: Articles, Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics, on Product Reliability

About Fred Schenkelberg

I am the reliability expert at FMS Reliability, a reliability engineering and management consulting firm I founded in 2004. I left Hewlett Packard (HP)’s Reliability Team, where I helped create a culture of reliability across the corporation, to assist other organizations.

« Sources of Variation
OC Curve with Binomial Method »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Article by Fred Schenkelberg
in the Musings series

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Articles

  • Leadership Values in Maintenance and Operations
  • Today’s Gremlin – It’ll never work here
  • How a Mission Statement Drives Behavioral Change in Organizations
  • Gremlins today
  • The Power of Vision in Leadership and Organizational Success

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy