Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
    • About Us
    • Colophon
    • Survey
  • Reliability.fm
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • NoMTBF
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • ASQR&R
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Maintenance Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • RCM Blitz®
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Field Reliability Data Analysis
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability by Design
      • Reliability Competence
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
      • Reliability Knowledge
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Institute of Quality & Reliability
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Statistical Methods for Failure-Time Data
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Glossary
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinar Sources
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • Your Courses
    • Live Courses
      • Introduction to Reliability Engineering & Accelerated Testings Course Landing Page
      • Advanced Accelerated Testing Course Landing Page
    • Integral Concepts Courses
      • Reliability Analysis Methods Course Landing Page
      • Applied Reliability Analysis Course Landing Page
      • Statistics, Hypothesis Testing, & Regression Modeling Course Landing Page
      • Measurement System Assessment Course Landing Page
      • SPC & Process Capability Course Landing Page
      • Design of Experiments Course Landing Page
    • The Manufacturing Academy Courses
      • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Statistics
      • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
      • Quality Engineering Statistics
      • FMEA in Practice
      • Process Capability Analysis course
      • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
      • Return on Investment online course
    • Industrial Metallurgist Courses
    • FMEA courses Powered by The Luminous Group
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • How to be an Online Student
    • Quondam Courses
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home
  • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction Course Landing Page
  • Upcoming Live Events
You are here: Home / Articles / Tolerance Intervals for Normal Distribution Based Set of Data

by Fred Schenkelberg 4 Comments

Tolerance Intervals for Normal Distribution Based Set of Data

Tolerance Intervals for Normal Distribution Based Set of Data

This is not the same as a confidence interval. For a mean or standard deviation, we can calculate the likelihood that the true parameter is within a range of values — confidence interval concerning a parameter.

A tolerance interval applies to the individual readings, not the statistics. The interval contains a certain proportion of the values within the distribution of individual data points. The endpoints are tolerance limits.

Another confusion is with engineering tolerances or tolerance limits.

These are the engineers desired range of manufactured output. The flange width may have a plus/minus specification on the drawing, for example. This may or may not be based on the statistical evaluation of the part variation and possible include the calculation of statistical tolerance interval.

Given a set of data what we either know or strongly suspect is normally distributed we can estimate the range of values that will contain a specific fraction of the individual values, with a specified confidence. This is more accurate than the Chebyshev Inequality, which doesn’t assume an underlying distribution.

Of course, there are tolerance interval calculations for other distributions and percentages, yet that is the subject of other articles.

Formula for two-sided normal distribution tolerance interval

There has been work to create viable estimates for tolerance intervals for some time. Starting with Wald and Wolfowitz (1946) and at last check by Odeh and Owen (1980). The NIST Engineering Statistics Handbook discusses tolerance intervals for a normal distribution and includes the following formula from Howe (1969).

$$ \large\displaystyle {{X}_{UL}}=\bar{X}\pm {{k}_{2}}s$$

Where X̄ and s are the sample mean and standard deviation, and
$- {{k}_{2}} -$is a factor which provides the approximation based on the proportion of the normal distribution desired to be contained within the tolerance interval and the confidence level for the estimate. The $- {{k}_{2}} -$ value calculation, also provided by Howe (1969) is

$$ \large\displaystyle {{k}_{2}}=\sqrt{\frac{\upsilon \left( 1+\tfrac{1}{N} \right)z_{{\left( 1-p \right)}/{2}\;}^{2}}{\chi _{1-\gamma ,\text{ }\upsilon }^{2}}}$$

Where, N is the sample size,
$- \chi _{1-\gamma ,\text{ }\upsilon }^{2} -$ is the critical value of the chi-squared distribution with
$- \upsilon -$ degrees of freedom with probability $- \gamma -$, and
$- z_{{\left( 1-p \right)}/{2}\;}^{2} -$ is the critical value of the normal distribution based on the cumulative probability $- {\left( 1-p \right)}/{2}\; -$.
p is the proportion of values that fall within the interval, where
$- \gamma -$ is the probability of that occurring (the confidence)

$- \upsilon -$ is the degrees of freedom used to estimate the standard deviation, s. Generally this is N-1.

An example problem

Let’s say we haves asked a capacitor vendor to create components that are approximately 5mm tall. We receive an initial batch of components and measure the height of 25 from the lot. We want to determine the interval that contains 90% of the capacitor heights with 99% confidence.

Based on the sample measurements we estimate the mean as 4.95mm and the standard deviation as 0.23mm.

Next we need to calculate the $- {{k}_{2}} -$ factor. Let’s follow the following five steps:

  1. Calculate the normal distribution cumulative probability

$$ \large\displaystyle {\left( 1-p \right)}/{2}\;={\left( 1-0.9 \right)}/{2}\;=0.05$$

  1. Calculate the $- \upsilon -$ degrees of freedom

$$ \large\displaystyle \upsilon =N-1=25-1=24$$

  1. Look up the critical value for the normal distribution (note: later this value is squared)

$$ \large\displaystyle {{z}_{{\left( 1-p \right)}/{2}\;}}={{z}_{0.05}}=-1.645$$

  1. Look up the lower critical value for the chi-squared distribution. Note: depending on your table you may need to use 0.99 to find the lower critical value. We are only excluding 0.01 of the lower tail in this case.

$$ \large\displaystyle\chi _{1-\gamma ,\text{ }\upsilon }^{2}=\chi _{0.01,\text{ 24}}^{2}=10.856$$

  1. Calculate $-{{k}_{2}} -$. Note: some books contain tables for a range of probabilities and confidences.

$$ \large\displaystyle {{k}_{2}}=\sqrt{\frac{\upsilon \left( 1+\tfrac{1}{N} \right)z_{{\left( 1-p \right)}/{2}\;}^{2}}{\chi _{1-\gamma ,\text{ }\upsilon }^{2}}}=\sqrt{\frac{24\left( 1+\tfrac{1}{25} \right)\left( -1.645 \right)}{10.856}}=2.49$$

Thus the 99% confidence 90% tolerance interval ranges from 4.38mm to
5.52mm.

With more samples, this interval may decrease slightly, yet the decision now lays with the engineering team to determine if the range of capacitor heights is acceptable or not for the application in question.

—

Wald, A.and Wolfowitz J., “Tolerance limits for a normal distribution, Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 17 (1946) 208-15.

Odeh, Robert E and D B Owen. 1980. Tables for Normal Tolerance Limits, Sampling Plans, and Screening. New York: M. Dekker. Web.

Howe, W G. 1969. Two-sided tolerance limits for normal populations some improvements. Journal of the American Statistical Association 64 (326): 610-620.


Related:

Statistical Confidence (article)

Reliability with Confidence (article)

Root Sum Squared Tolerance Analysis Method (article)

 

Filed Under: Articles, CRE Preparation Notes, Reliability in Design and Development Tagged With: Tolerance analysis

About Fred Schenkelberg

I am the reliability expert at FMS Reliability, a reliability engineering and management consulting firm I founded in 2004. I left Hewlett Packard (HP)’s Reliability Team, where I helped create a culture of reliability across the corporation, to assist other organizations.

« Reliability Benefits of Alpha and Beta Testing
Standby Redundancy, Equal Failure Rates, Imperfect Switching »

Comments

  1. Matti Vuotila says

    January 15, 2018 at 10:23 PM

    Nice to have a good, simple explanation and example on these basic statistics things, thanks.

    But, hmmm …
    I suppose that we just ended on having the k2 of value 2.49. When this is multiplied by the s (0.23) we have 0.573 and the range would become from 4.38 to 5,52 mm instead of 2.46mm to 7.44mm.

    maybe ?

    Reply
    • Fred Schenkelberg says

      January 16, 2018 at 2:32 PM

      You are right and thanks for pointing out the error in the final calculation. I added/substract the k2 value not the k2 times the standard deviation, which is correct.

      Thanks for pointing out the error and your careful reading.

      Cheers,

      Fred
      PS: I’ve updated the example results

      Reply
  2. Anthony says

    September 30, 2022 at 6:49 AM

    Hi Fred,

    In summary, Tolerance Interval is combination of Confidence Interval + Proportion.

    But what is the logic of K2?
    Is tolerance Interval kind of similar to Reliability?

    Thanks,
    Anthony

    Reply
    • Fred Schenkelberg says

      September 30, 2022 at 7:04 AM

      Hi Anthony,

      good question – keep in mind that a tolerance interval is related to individual values within the distribution. The interval is the range over which the actual (unknown true) values exist with a specific confidence.

      Reliability is a function of the distribution which provide the probability of survival over a specified duration (often from time zero).

      You could calculate the tolerance interval for a Weibull distribution for example and it would be a bit bigger than the nominal plot we would typically do… keep in mind that when we fit a distribution to data, it is an estimate of the actual distribution that the data comes from (and it remains unknown). The tolerance interval is where the actual inviduals points of the actual, unknown, distribution may occur.

      Tolerance intervals also do not only apply to distributions, one may calculate a tolerance interval about any statistic as well.

      cheers,

      Fred

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

CRE Preparation Notes

Article by Fred Schenkelberg

Join Accendo

Join our members-only community for full access to exclusive eBooks, webinars, training, and more.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Get Full Site Access

Not ready to join?
Stay current on new articles, podcasts, webinars, courses and more added to the Accendo Reliability website each week.
No membership required to subscribe.

[popup type="" link_text="Get Weekly Email Updates" link_class="button" ][display_form id=266][/popup]

  • CRE Preparation Notes
  • CRE Prep
  • Reliability Management
  • Probability and Statistics for Reliability
  • Reliability in Design and Development
  • Reliability Modeling and Predictions
  • Reliability Testing
  • Maintainability and Availability
  • Data Collection and Use

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy