Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
    • About Us
    • Colophon
    • Survey
  • Reliability.fm
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • NoMTBF
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • ASQR&R
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Maintenance Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • RCM Blitz®
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Field Reliability Data Analysis
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability by Design
      • Reliability Competence
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
      • Reliability Knowledge
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Institute of Quality & Reliability
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Statistical Methods for Failure-Time Data
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Glossary
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinar Sources
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • Your Courses
    • Live Courses
      • Introduction to Reliability Engineering & Accelerated Testings Course Landing Page
      • Advanced Accelerated Testing Course Landing Page
    • Integral Concepts Courses
      • Reliability Analysis Methods Course Landing Page
      • Applied Reliability Analysis Course Landing Page
      • Statistics, Hypothesis Testing, & Regression Modeling Course Landing Page
      • Measurement System Assessment Course Landing Page
      • SPC & Process Capability Course Landing Page
      • Design of Experiments Course Landing Page
    • The Manufacturing Academy Courses
      • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Statistics
      • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
      • Quality Engineering Statistics
      • FMEA in Practice
      • Process Capability Analysis course
      • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
      • Return on Investment online course
    • Industrial Metallurgist Courses
    • FMEA courses Powered by The Luminous Group
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • How to be an Online Student
    • Quondam Courses
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home
  • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction Course Landing Page
  • Upcoming Live Events
You are here: Home / Articles / To Scribe or Not to Scribe

by Carl S. Carlson Leave a Comment

To Scribe or Not to Scribe

To Scribe or Not to Scribe

Mediocrity can talk, but it is for genius to observe. – Benjamin Disraeli

The Inside FMEA series has completed the primary facilitation skills. The next few articles will cover special facilitation topics.

This article talks about the pros and cons of using a “scribe” to help with facilitation.

What is a scribe?

In ancient times, a scribe was someone who made copies of manuscripts before the invention of automatic printing. In modern times, a scribe is a person who serves as a professional copyist.

In FMEA applications, a scribe is someone who enters FMEA information into an FMEA spreadsheet or database in real time during FMEA meetings. It is an optional role.

Why is the role of scribe useful in FMEA meetings?

One of the key attributes of an excellent facilitator is the ability to keep eyes on the team. Assigning the role of scribe, for entering FMEA entries, and making them visible to the team, can be a significant help.

Does the FMEA scribe only make FMEA entries?

No, the scribe is usually double hatted. The assigned scribe makes entries in the FMEA worksheet or database, as well as offering their opinion to the FMEA discussion, based on their area of expertise.

What does a scribe do in FMEA meetings?

In general, the scribe listens to the FMEA proceedings and enters information that advances the FMEA meeting toward its objectives. The whole idea is to make the FMEA proceedings visible to the team to solicit feedback and keep the meeting moving. Of course, this also allows the FMEA facilitator to not have to slow down the meeting while everyone waits for information to be entered.

The best scribes don’t wait to be told what to write. They observe and when information is discussed that would benefit from “making it visible,” they make an entry on their own decision. In other words, they do not have to wait until the team has fully achieved consensus before entering information. They can decide when a certain level of information will be useful as part of the consensus process. By making useful information visible, the team can make adjustments and end up with FMEA entries that reflect team discussion and consensus.

Should you use a scribe in your FMEAs?

Some FMEA facilitators are sufficiently skilled as typists that they can keep eyes on the team while entering vital information in the worksheet. In many cases, the FMEA will go faster and more efficiently with proper us of a scribe.

Regardless of whether or not a scribe is used, it is important to not have the team waiting for information to be typed. It is a waste of valuable subject matter expert time to sit and watch someone type.

Tip

The role of scribe can be rotated between the FMEA team members.

Next Article

There are times when there are two or more competing ideas or solutions and an FMEA facilitator has difficulty arriving at consensus with the FMEA team. One tool that can be used to solve this problem is Pugh Analysis. The next article in the FMEA Facilitation series presents this unique type of decision matrix called Pugh Analysis.

[display_form id=415]

Filed Under: Articles, Inside FMEA, on Tools & Techniques Tagged With: Facilitation

About Carl S. Carlson

Carl S. Carlson is a consultant and instructor in the areas of FMEA, reliability program planning and other reliability engineering disciplines, supporting over one hundred clients from a wide cross-section of industries. He has 35 years of experience in reliability testing, engineering, and management positions, including senior consultant with ReliaSoft Corporation, and senior manager for the Advanced Reliability Group at General Motors.

« Quantitative Risk Assessment: Will Quantifying Risks Help You Minimize Them?
Deliberately Create Reliability »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Articles by Carl Carlson
in the Inside FMEA series

[popup type="" link_text="Logo Info" ]

Information about FMEA Icon

Inside FMEA can be visually represented by a large tree, with roots, a solid trunk, branches, and leaves.

- The roots of the tree represent the philosophy and guiding principles for effective FMEAs.
- The solid trunk of the tree represents the fundamentals for all FMEAs.
- The branches represent the various FMEA applications.
- The leaves represent the valuable outcomes of FMEAs.
- This is intended to convey that each of the various FMEA applications have the same fundamentals and philosophical roots.

 

For example, the roots of the tree can represent following philosophy and guiding principles for effective FMEAs, such as:

1. Correct procedure         2. Lessons learned
3. Trained team                 4. Focus on prevention
5. Integrated with DFR    6. Skilled facilitation
7. Management support

The tree trunk represents the fundamentals of FMEA. All types of FMEA share common fundamentals, and these are essential to successful FMEA applications.

The tree branches can include the different types of FMEAs, including:

1. System FMEA         2. Design FMEA
3. Process FMEA        4. DRBFM
5. Hazard Analysis     6. RCM or Maintenance FMEA
7. Software FMEA      8. Other types of FMEA

The leaves of the tree branches represent individual FMEA projects, with a wide variety of FMEA scopes and results. [/popup]

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Posts

  • Gremlins today
  • The Power of Vision in Leadership and Organizational Success
  • 3 Types of MTBF Stories
  • ALT: An in Depth Description
  • Project Email Economics

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy