Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
    • About Us
    • Colophon
    • Survey
  • Reliability.fm
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • NoMTBF
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • ASQR&R
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Maintenance Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • RCM Blitz®
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Field Reliability Data Analysis
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability by Design
      • Reliability Competence
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
      • Reliability Knowledge
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Institute of Quality & Reliability
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Statistical Methods for Failure-Time Data
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Glossary
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinar Sources
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • Your Courses
    • Live Courses
      • Introduction to Reliability Engineering & Accelerated Testings Course Landing Page
      • Advanced Accelerated Testing Course Landing Page
    • Integral Concepts Courses
      • Reliability Analysis Methods Course Landing Page
      • Applied Reliability Analysis Course Landing Page
      • Statistics, Hypothesis Testing, & Regression Modeling Course Landing Page
      • Measurement System Assessment Course Landing Page
      • SPC & Process Capability Course Landing Page
      • Design of Experiments Course Landing Page
    • The Manufacturing Academy Courses
      • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Statistics
      • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
      • Quality Engineering Statistics
      • FMEA in Practice
      • Process Capability Analysis course
      • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
      • Return on Investment online course
    • Industrial Metallurgist Courses
    • FMEA courses Powered by The Luminous Group
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • How to be an Online Student
    • Quondam Courses
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home
  • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction Course Landing Page
  • Upcoming Live Events
You are here: Home / Articles / The Rising Tide of Young Professionals: Overcoming Intergenerational Communication Gaps in Reliability Engineering

by JD Solomon Leave a Comment

The Rising Tide of Young Professionals: Overcoming Intergenerational Communication Gaps in Reliability Engineering

Young professionals (under 40) will make up over half of the workforce by the end of next year. That means communication between young professionals and experienced professionals is essential for workplace success. Younger professionals dominating the workforce means that reliability engineering is undergoing formative changes. These are a few general thoughts on the impacts of the changing workforce and five ways it will impact reliability engineering.

Some General Thoughts on Intergenerational Communication

Here are a few thoughts on intergenerational communication from my recent interview on The YoPro Know Podcast.

On Using Social Media

Companies are generally awkward with social media and how to reach the younger generations. On the one hand, companies know to try. On the other hand, the HR people and some of the technical managers are really bad at it.

Companies should do a gap analysis on reaching young professionals. There are inadvertent things companies do that really cause them to stumble inadvertently. Most companies do too much of a cookie-cutter approach to recruiting and retention.

On Favorite Technical Tools

Microsoft Excel is the number one business software in the world. And Excel can do everything that PowerPoint can in terms of visual presentations. Microsoft Excel is the backbone for universal communication between all workforce generations.

There are more technical tools now, too. For example, the AI tool Mid-Journy is one in which I do a lot of my own graphics. It’s a large language model that does phenomenal, quick work. Younger generations expect the experienced generations to embrace these tools and communicate with them.

On Existing Communication Gaps

There is a lot of talk about the younger generations coming to communicate in ways embraced by the experienced generations. That may have been the case in the past. Now, I don’t see it purely as one way or another. Certain aspects like technology and workplace practices like working from home are emerging quickly. There needs to be a meeting in the middle if businesses (and their technical professionals) are going to be successful.

On Aging Workforce

Companies are still struggling to attract talent. The experienced generations are coming off the hopper. The gap for many of my organizations is in the technically trained areas where people have to have certifications and licenses. Companies do not see as many young professionals getting certified or trained as they did 10, 20, or 30 years ago. That means the experienced generations are going to stay around longer. The potential for intergenerational communication challenges also is not going away.

On Hybrid Workshops

Virtual platform training is less emphasized as the workforce is now back in person. This shift has meant that hybrid formats have overtaken virtual meeting formats. Hybrid means we still need virtual platform training in Teams, Zoom, Skype, Slack, Discord, and Circle. The fact that younger generations use different virtual platforms means that pressure to be trained in more platforms will increase. Hybrid formats are the toughest to keep everyone involved to the same degree.

How Intergenerational Communication Will Impact Reliability Engineering

These are my Top 5 impacts in the coming years to the reliability profession.

Hybrid Workshops Are Here To Stay

The days of getting everyone in the same room to do things like Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) and Root Cause Analysis (RCA) are gone. Working at least part of the time from home is here to stay. That means reliability leaders must improve in virtual platforms, facilitating participants who are not in the room and adjusting our reliability tools.

AI Is Expected In Every Reliability Tool

AI is where things are. We no longer debate generating FMEAs from scratch or using templates. The debate is the source of the initial template. The younger generations expect it.

Fewer Experienced and Knowledgeable Reliability Leaders

The younger generations need AI because they don’t spend enough time in their jobs to understand how things work. Plus, those younger workers like praise and titles almost as much as they like compensation. Many will have the title, but few will have the depth of understanding.

Even Fewer Young Professionals in Maintenance

If fewer young professionals are going into reliability, then the one-third of the business that is in the maintenance sector will hurt the most. If we can’t find skilled trades workers now, then there is a lower expectation that the white-collar workers will end up in maintenance. Remember, in the past, many engineering professionals had their first jobs in O&M (and liked it). That’s not the case with the younger generations.

The Older Generations Are Not Going Away

The lack of numbers and experience means the older generations are not going away. That may be good in many ways. But one bad part is that the current workers under 40 and those over 40 do not communicate in the same way. The technology is not going to change the younger generations, so the older ones must meet the younger ones over half-way. We older reliability professionals are not good at that.

Moving Forward with FINESSE

The FINESSE fishbone diagram identifies the seven causal factors needed to communicate effectively when complexity and uncertainty are high. Intergenerational communication is one of the three major communication barriers that FINESSE successfully overcomes. However, the rising tide of younger generations (those under 40) will impact the hard skills in reliability in similar ways to how it impacts the soft skills.


Communicating with FINESSE is a not-for-profit community of technical professionals dedicated to being highly effective communicators and facilitators. Learn more about our publications, webinars, and workshops. Join the community for free.

JD Solomon is the author of Communicating Reliability, Risk & Resiliency to Decision Makers: How to Get Your Boss’s Boss to Understand and Facilitating with FINESSE: A Guide to Successful Business Solutions.

Filed Under: Articles, Communicating with FINESSE, on Systems Thinking Tagged With: Reliability engineering, reliability practices

About JD Solomon

JD Solomon, PE, CRE, CMRP provides facilitation, business case evaluation, root cause analysis, and risk management. His roles as a senior leader in two Fortune 500 companies, as a town manager, and as chairman of a state regulatory board provide him with a first-hand perspective of how senior decision-makers think. His technical expertise in systems engineering and risk & uncertainty analysis using Monte Carlo simulation provides him practical perspectives on the strengths and limitations of advanced technical approaches.  In practice, JD works with front-line staff and executive leaders to create workable solutions for facilities, infrastructure, and business processes.

« Determining Your Bad Actors
Why Use Nonparametric Reliability Statistics? »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Headshot of JD SolomonArticles by JD Solomon
in the Communicating with FINESSE article series

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Posts

  • Gremlins today
  • The Power of Vision in Leadership and Organizational Success
  • 3 Types of MTBF Stories
  • ALT: An in Depth Description
  • Project Email Economics

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy