Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
    • About Us
    • Colophon
    • Survey
  • Reliability.fm
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • NoMTBF
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • ASQR&R
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Maintenance Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • RCM Blitz®
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Field Reliability Data Analysis
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability by Design
      • Reliability Competence
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
      • Reliability Knowledge
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Institute of Quality & Reliability
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Statistical Methods for Failure-Time Data
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Glossary
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinar Sources
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • Your Courses
    • Live Courses
      • Introduction to Reliability Engineering & Accelerated Testings Course Landing Page
      • Advanced Accelerated Testing Course Landing Page
    • Integral Concepts Courses
      • Reliability Analysis Methods Course Landing Page
      • Applied Reliability Analysis Course Landing Page
      • Statistics, Hypothesis Testing, & Regression Modeling Course Landing Page
      • Measurement System Assessment Course Landing Page
      • SPC & Process Capability Course Landing Page
      • Design of Experiments Course Landing Page
    • The Manufacturing Academy Courses
      • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Statistics
      • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
      • Quality Engineering Statistics
      • FMEA in Practice
      • Process Capability Analysis course
      • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
      • Return on Investment online course
    • Industrial Metallurgist Courses
    • FMEA courses Powered by The Luminous Group
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • How to be an Online Student
    • Quondam Courses
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home
  • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction Course Landing Page
  • Upcoming Live Events
You are here: Home / Articles / The Art of Creating a Reliability Plan

by Fred Schenkelberg 2 Comments

The Art of Creating a Reliability Plan

The Art of Creating a Reliability Plan

A plan is a road map toward a destination. It provide guidance toward a goal. The idea of a plan is to consider the path forward, the knowledge necessary to acquire, and the decisions along the way.

No plan is perfect other than those that successfully accommodate the successes and setbacks along the way. No plan can anticipate all the information yet to be uncovered, yet it can set a course to deliberately uncover what is necessary to move forward.

There is no one plan that will work within your organization. There is a framework to guide your plan development and adjustments along the way. What worked for your previous project will not quite work for the next one. Every situation and challenge is unique, thus every plan has to be unique.

Reliability Plan and Decisions

A reliability plan assists the people in your organization to make better decisions that result in creating a reliable product the meets your customs and your business objectives. A plan provides a roadmap for your team to know what is the objective what are the hurdles in knowledge or understanding that may prevent the achievement of those objectives. A well crafted plan sets out specific tasks to address the creation of the specific information that enables the entire team to make appropriate decisions resulting in a reliable product.

The essence of a reliablity plan is to incorporate the reliablity vision, understand the gaps, and provide a robust set of tasks that allow a team to set a goal, understand and learn along the way as they adjust to the available information as they consider the many priorities, including reliability performance.

Keep in mind that a plan does not create a reliable product – it is the thousands of decisions that occur during the creation of a product, from concept through manufacturing, shipping, and installation. Reliability is built-in primarily during the design phase by all the decisions concerning design concept, component selection, material selection, etc. These decisions are not all laid out in the reliability plan, yet the plan can influence all of the decisions across an organization that impact reliability performance.

Stay Flexible

Another key concept is a plan is not a fixed object once created. It has to bend, flow, or change as the information available, constraints, and uncertainties change. The plan should include reminders to check if the existing plan is the plan that best serves the project at this time. If not, change the plan.

Sometimes, we do not know enough about a new material, so plan to run some experiments to learn how it may fail in our application. The initial plan most likely would not include running accelerated testing, as we would need to know how it fails to design such a test. Sometimes, a key component becomes unavailable, and we start exploring viable options. Plans change.

Another common occurrence is the project changes a set of key requirements, or adds a function, or changes market scope. These changes often signal a change in timeline, material set, or design complexity. Each signals a need to review the reliability plan to insure the plan addresses the new challenges.

The Ongoing Work of Planning

The initial plan does take some work to fully understand the requirements, constraints, capabilities, and more. The plan should focus on the key decisions that require better insights and information.

Furthermore, the plan will change. Plan to change the plan to keep it relevant and focused on what is needed to improve the ability to make better decisions.

The plan may consist of goals, models, specific activities, and guidelines. It is there to guide not only the work of the reliability professional. It is there to guide the work of the extended design and development team.

Filed Under: Articles, Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics, on Product Reliability

About Fred Schenkelberg

I am the reliability expert at FMS Reliability, a reliability engineering and management consulting firm I founded in 2004. I left Hewlett Packard (HP)’s Reliability Team, where I helped create a culture of reliability across the corporation, to assist other organizations.

« Using Failure Mode Effects Criticality Analysis as a Reliability Tool
Do Human Performance Learning Teams Make RCA Obsolete »

Comments

  1. Carla says

    September 26, 2021 at 10:35 PM

    This is an excellent hint.). My experience is that, in general, Companies expect a to-do-list as much standard as possible. This is doable we need simply assess a product compliance to some standards or requirements, not product reliability.
    The switch to this mind set is hard for a couple of reasons: there is the ‘feeling’ the time is too long and the cost too high and , probably, the awareness the not always the available skills are adequate.

    Reply
    • Fred Schenkelberg says

      September 27, 2021 at 8:54 AM

      Hi Carla, true if the expectations are for the use of standards and it’s quick and easy – it is a mindset issue. Hence the need to focus on what are the key decisions that involve reliability and help the team understand the value of having good information to assist in making those key decisions. cheers, Fred

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Article by Fred Schenkelberg
in the Musings series

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Articles

  • Gremlins today
  • The Power of Vision in Leadership and Organizational Success
  • 3 Types of MTBF Stories
  • ALT: An in Depth Description
  • Project Email Economics

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy