Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
    • About Us
    • Colophon
    • Survey
  • Reliability.fm
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • NoMTBF
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • ASQR&R
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Maintenance Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • RCM Blitz®
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Field Reliability Data Analysis
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability by Design
      • Reliability Competence
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
      • Reliability Knowledge
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Institute of Quality & Reliability
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Statistical Methods for Failure-Time Data
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Glossary
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinar Sources
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • Your Courses
    • Live Courses
      • Introduction to Reliability Engineering & Accelerated Testings Course Landing Page
      • Advanced Accelerated Testing Course Landing Page
    • Integral Concepts Courses
      • Reliability Analysis Methods Course Landing Page
      • Applied Reliability Analysis Course Landing Page
      • Statistics, Hypothesis Testing, & Regression Modeling Course Landing Page
      • Measurement System Assessment Course Landing Page
      • SPC & Process Capability Course Landing Page
      • Design of Experiments Course Landing Page
    • The Manufacturing Academy Courses
      • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Statistics
      • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
      • Quality Engineering Statistics
      • FMEA in Practice
      • Process Capability Analysis course
      • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
      • Return on Investment online course
    • Industrial Metallurgist Courses
    • FMEA courses Powered by The Luminous Group
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • How to be an Online Student
    • Quondam Courses
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home
  • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction Course Landing Page
  • Upcoming Live Events
You are here: Home / Articles / Talent and Professionalism as a Reliability Engineer

by Fred Schenkelberg 1 Comment

Talent and Professionalism as a Reliability Engineer

Talent and Professionalism as a Reliability Engineer

My dictionary says that talented is “having a natural aptitude or skill for something.”

We learn reliability engineering and those who understand the range of tools and techniques useful for a given situation would be considered talented.

Everything is not solved by running a highly accelerated life test (HALT) or only conducting detailed failure analysis. Knowing when and why to apply a particular tool and using the tool effectively (i.e., when to use a Weibull distribution to model lifetime data and how to use the information to make decisions) are critical.

There are many ways to achieve the knowledge required:

  • enrolling in university programs,
  • reading papers and books,
  • or attending seminars and conferences.

The talent shows up in one’s ability to make an astute selection of tools to assist in solving problems, identifying risks, or estimating life.

A key element of reliability engineering is reliability statistics, given the emphasis in the American Society for Quality Certified Reliability Engineer body of knowledge and my own experience.

Some have a knack for tackling this information and others struggle. Mastering statistics is crucial for those considered talented in reliability engineering.

Over one’s career, a reliability engineer has the opportunity to work on many projects. The materials, designs, and assembly processes all continue to evolve and change.

The basic tools for reliability engineering have not changed as fast as most engineering disciplines, yet the breadth of knowledge and skill required does call for mastery and talent.

Talented reliability engineers apply the right tool to solve the problem in a cost-effective and timely manner.

This takes knowledge of the variety of tools at our disposal along with the foresight to minimize risk and maximize useful information. This talent is acquired with experience and enhanced with intelligence.

How to recognize a reliability engineering professional

The dictionary defines professional as “a person engaged or qualified in a profession.”

Our profession is reliability engineering.

Our career is in the pursuit of identifying what will fail and determine when will it fail. We work to meet or improve product reliability.

Within the profession, there are specialists focused on product testing, risk or life modeling, or on specific industries or types of products. We can work on projects ranging from biocompatible polymers in a medical device to redundant modeling of aircraft flight control systems.

 

Professionalism

I also believe that professional means acting in a professional manner.

Professional engineering societies often have a code of conduct or ethics standards to guide professionals in their field. [4,5] It also means not working beyond your area of knowledge or expertise nor working in a deceitful or self-serving manner.

Being professional also means behaving with decorum.

Listening to others, understanding the situation beyond the immediate reliability engineering task, and working well with others are all professional requirements. Professionals represent the reliability engineering discipline and need to present their discipline well.

Talent

Whereas being talented implies a mastery of a body of knowledge, being professional suggests that we bring to the team our knowledge and skills in a forthright manner.

This is what we do as we apply our skills to solve problems related to reliability engineering.

Let us say you are reporting initial results of an experiment to your boss, and he disagrees with the results. He wants a different result to support a proposal and the data do not support that desired outcome. You did the experiment well and trust your findings. Do you alter the results and support your boss, or do you publish the results as found?

In any field, there are many agendas and desired outcomes. In reliability engineering, the final outcome may not become apparent for months or years. It is our professional standards that guide us to work honestly and report our findings accurately.


 

Related:

Success as a Reliability Engineer (article)

Basics of Reliability Engineering (article)

Filed Under: Articles, Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics, on Product Reliability Tagged With: Professional development

About Fred Schenkelberg

I am the reliability expert at FMS Reliability, a reliability engineering and management consulting firm I founded in 2004. I left Hewlett Packard (HP)’s Reliability Team, where I helped create a culture of reliability across the corporation, to assist other organizations.

« Failure Modes and Mechanisms
Laplace’s Trend Test »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Article by Fred Schenkelberg
in the Musings series

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Articles

  • Gremlins today
  • The Power of Vision in Leadership and Organizational Success
  • 3 Types of MTBF Stories
  • ALT: An in Depth Description
  • Project Email Economics

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy