Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
    • About Us
    • Colophon
    • Survey
  • Reliability.fm
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • NoMTBF
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • ASQR&R
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Maintenance Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • RCM Blitz®
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Field Reliability Data Analysis
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability by Design
      • Reliability Competence
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
      • Reliability Knowledge
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Institute of Quality & Reliability
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Statistical Methods for Failure-Time Data
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Glossary
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinar Sources
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • Your Courses
    • Live Courses
      • Introduction to Reliability Engineering & Accelerated Testings Course Landing Page
      • Advanced Accelerated Testing Course Landing Page
    • Integral Concepts Courses
      • Reliability Analysis Methods Course Landing Page
      • Applied Reliability Analysis Course Landing Page
      • Statistics, Hypothesis Testing, & Regression Modeling Course Landing Page
      • Measurement System Assessment Course Landing Page
      • SPC & Process Capability Course Landing Page
      • Design of Experiments Course Landing Page
    • The Manufacturing Academy Courses
      • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Statistics
      • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
      • Quality Engineering Statistics
      • FMEA in Practice
      • Process Capability Analysis course
      • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
      • Return on Investment online course
    • Industrial Metallurgist Courses
    • FMEA courses Powered by The Luminous Group
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • How to be an Online Student
    • Quondam Courses
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home
  • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction Course Landing Page
  • Upcoming Live Events
You are here: Home / Articles / on Risk & Safety / CERM® Risk Insights / Simple Doesn’t Mean Easy

by Greg Hutchins Leave a Comment

Simple Doesn’t Mean Easy

Simple Doesn’t Mean Easy

Guest Post by Andrew Sheves (first posted on CERM ® RISK INSIGHTS – reposted here with permission)

I realized a while back that it can be too easy to mistake ‘simple’ with ‘easy’ and I’ve been concerned that promoting a simple approach to risk management might lead people to think that this makes everything easy. Unfortunately, even though a KISS approach makes risk management easier, it doesn’t do away with the need for hard work altogether. Worst of all, it can be easy to mistake shortcuts for simplification.

I made the same mistake myself recently with my running.

I’m hoping to tackle a longer race this fall (although to be honest this seems less and less likely with COVID) and have been looking for inspiration for my training, which I realized really means that I’ve been looking for shortcuts.

Like everything, running goes through phases and fads, so there are all kinds of options that promise alternatives to hours and hours of training. But I’ve been running long enough to have seen plenty of fads come and go and, in the end, the same basic principles come up:

  • If I want to run faster, I need more speedwork.
  • If I want to run farther, I need to run longer.
  • If I want to be strong, I need to run up and down some hills.

That’s all very simple. It’s just not necessarily easy. *sigh*  Goodbye shortcuts….

But I realize you didn’t come here for a primer on distance running, so what has this to do with risk management?

Shortcuts aren’t the answer

Well, you might find yourself looking for shortcuts as a risk manager too. And even if you aren’t, your managers will be.

“That seems like a lot of effort. Let’s find an easier way to do this.”

“I just read something in the HBR, and there’s a new technique we can try that will give us the same results in half the time.”

“You know, the other CEOs I speak to aren’t worrying about this right now.”

All of this is code for ‘find a shortcut.’

But the shortcut might not be there or the new fab you follow for a while doesn’t endure and you have to go back to the same basic principles.

But that doesn’t mean that this is the easy approach. Instead, simple can be hard.

And when you encounter difficulty, that’s when you’re going to look for a shortcut.

Unfortunately, there might not be one. Instead, you just need to put in the hard miles, so to speak.

(It’s worth stressing that there’s a difference between being efficient or innovative and looking for shortcuts. I’m a huge fan of efficiency, and there are often improvements that we can make to processes but that’s not the same a cutting corners.)

Hard problems require hard work

The fact is that hard problems don’t lend themselves to easy solutions. And even if the answer is apparent from an early stage, making the decision easy, that doesn’t mean there’s not a lot of hard work ahead.

So the earlier you’re able to accept that there’s no easy solution, the better. Looking for shortcuts is often just a waste of time. Time in which the problem becomes bigger.

I’ve been in the room while we circled the right (but challenging) answer for hours or days, looking for an easier solution.

But in the end, we just had to accept that there wasn’t an easy way out: we had to do the obvious, hard thing.

So KISS risk management doesn’t mean easy risk management, I’m afraid. There’s still hard work ahead, but the good news is that this hard work will generate the results you want.

You just have to put in the miles.

Andrew Sheves Bio

Andrew Sheves is a risk, crisis, and security manager with over 25 years of experience managing risk in the commercial sector and in government. He has provided risk, security, and crisis management support worldwide to clients ranging from Fortune Five oil and gas firms, pharmaceutical majors and banks to NGOs, schools and high net worth individuals. This has allowed him to work at every stage of the risk management cycle from the field to the boardroom. During this time, Andrew has been involved in the response to a range of major incidents including offshore blowout, terrorism, civil unrest, pipeline spill, cyber attack, coup d’etat, and kidnapping.

Filed Under: CERM® Risk Insights, on Risk & Safety

About Greg Hutchins

Greg Hutchins PE CERM is the evangelist of Future of Quality: Risk®. He has been involved in quality since 1985 when he set up the first quality program in North America based on Mil Q 9858 for the natural gas industry. Mil Q became ISO 9001 in 1987

He is the author of more than 30 books. ISO 31000: ERM is the best-selling and highest-rated ISO risk book on Amazon (4.8 stars). Value Added Auditing (4th edition) is the first ISO risk-based auditing book.

« Explaining Protective Devices on My Sister’s Birthday in Boston, MA
Do you have a Reliability Department? »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

CERM® Risk Insights series Article by Greg Hutchins, Editor and noted guest authors

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Articles

  • Gremlins today
  • The Power of Vision in Leadership and Organizational Success
  • 3 Types of MTBF Stories
  • ALT: An in Depth Description
  • Project Email Economics

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy