A Hard Drive Issue Ate My Homework
Abstract
Adam and Fred discussing how to pursue reliability in home/office computing.
ᐅ Play Episode
Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site
Let us address your reliability engineering questions. Gain the experience of your peers and accelerate the improvement of your program and career.
Listen, comment, send questions, join the discussion.
by Adam Bahret Leave a Comment
Adam and Fred discussing how to pursue reliability in home/office computing.
ᐅ Play Episode
Kirk and Fred discussing underwater drones and how we divide up a product to most efficiently apply HALT to subsystems before applying stress to the whole product
ᐅ Play Episode
Kirk and Fred discussing discussing the recent article that Kirk posted on LinkedIn about smartphone’s water resistance
ᐅ Play Episode
by Christopher Jackson Leave a Comment
Chris and Fred discuss ‘Leaders that Don’t Understand.’ And by ‘Don’t Understand’ … we mean they don’t understand what their organization sells or does. Sometimes this can work (within reason). Leaders who are not experts in their product or services can still be effective if they know that they need to listen to those around them. But this can go too far – if all decisions need to be collectively agreed by a large cadre of people before the leader in question agrees to make a decision. This isn’t leadership at all. The concept of having ‘everyone on board’ can decimate decision making speed, innovation and a focus on customers. Have you had a similar experience?
ᐅ Play Episode
Kirk and Fred discussing old gasoline motors used in lawn equipment and how they can last what seems forever.
ᐅ Play Episode
Kirk and Fred discussing the recent failures of the new folding Samsung Galaxy phone and what might have been missed in their testing video.
ᐅ Play Episode
by Christopher Jackson 2 Comments
Chris and Fred discuss what happens when you can’t avoid having the MTBF imposed upon you – even if it is your own organization and not the customer. Perhaps you are told that ‘our competitors quote the MTBF … so we have to as well!’ But you can (sneakily) tailor test data to get whatever MTBF you want. You can make life easy on yourself by not challenging this paradigm (noting that you will most likely get an unhappy customer). But it is almost impossible to apportion MTBF goals to individual designers that even allow the motivated ones to create a reliable system. So what do you do? Listen to this podcast to help you on your reliability journey.
ᐅ Play Episode
by Christopher Jackson Leave a Comment
Chris and Fred discuss scenarios where it is (for whatever reason) impossible to demonstrate reliability through testing. Some organizations think that if you can’t demonstrate through testing … then it can’t be a requirement that appears in a specification. So … does this mean that the customer can’t get something that is reliable if we can’t test for it? … can customers even ask for it? Of course they can. The customer knows what they want. Everyone needs to understand that you can verify performance through activities that don’t involve testing (… like analysis). This is how it works for nuclear power plants … so what makes your organization special? Listen to this podcast if this intrigues you.
ᐅ Play Episode
by Carl S. Carlson Leave a Comment
Carl and Fred continuing to discuss the subject of integrating reliability within a very fast product development timeline.
ᐅ Play Episode
Carl and Fred discussing how the approach to achieving high reliability needs to change when operating in a fast-to-market product development process.
ᐅ Play Episode
Adam and Fred discussing the challenges and strategies for improving the reliability engineering community.
ᐅ Play Episode
by Adam Bahret Leave a Comment
Adam and Fred discussing The “Silver Bullet” approach to Reliability Engineering
ᐅ Play Episode
Kirk and Fred discussing Reliability Specifications and how companies set reliability requirements in new products
ᐅ Play Episode
Kirk and Fred discussing reliability training and the best way to have new reliability development techniques.
ᐅ Play Episode
by Adam Bahret Leave a Comment
Chris and Adam discuss FDSC. This may only mean something to you if you have experience in ‘military’ equipment. It stands for Failure Definition and Scoring Criteria. And it is used to remove subjectivity in classifying what sort of failure it is. Unless the military customer decides to change these during development. And this causes issues for all. If you want to hear more about what happens when you ‘shift the goal posts’ during development, then listen to this podcast!
ᐅ Play Episode