Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
    • About Us
    • Colophon
    • Survey
  • Reliability.fm
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • NoMTBF
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • ASQR&R
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Maintenance Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • RCM Blitz®
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Field Reliability Data Analysis
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability by Design
      • Reliability Competence
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
      • Reliability Knowledge
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Institute of Quality & Reliability
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Statistical Methods for Failure-Time Data
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Glossary
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinar Sources
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • Your Courses
    • Live Courses
      • Introduction to Reliability Engineering & Accelerated Testings Course Landing Page
      • Advanced Accelerated Testing Course Landing Page
    • Integral Concepts Courses
      • Reliability Analysis Methods Course Landing Page
      • Applied Reliability Analysis Course Landing Page
      • Statistics, Hypothesis Testing, & Regression Modeling Course Landing Page
      • Measurement System Assessment Course Landing Page
      • SPC & Process Capability Course Landing Page
      • Design of Experiments Course Landing Page
    • The Manufacturing Academy Courses
      • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Statistics
      • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
      • Quality Engineering Statistics
      • FMEA in Practice
      • Process Capability Analysis course
      • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
      • Return on Investment online course
    • Industrial Metallurgist Courses
    • FMEA courses Powered by The Luminous Group
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • How to be an Online Student
    • Quondam Courses
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home
  • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction Course Landing Page
  • Upcoming Live Events
You are here: Home / Articles / Is Safety Really Important?

by Doug Plucknette Leave a Comment

Is Safety Really Important?

Is Safety Really Important?

Something to think about in a day and age when most companies post their Mission, Vision and Goals on the company web page. Do we really stand behind these statements and demonstrate the behaviors that clearly show we are willing to do what it takes to create a safe workplace?

If you have ever questioned this, consider two questions I ask RCM Teams as we analyze failure modes that impact Health, Safety and Environment;

  1. If someone were to lose a finger or part of a hand in a machine at your plant, how long would it be before the equipment was up and running?
  2. If someone were to die in a work related incident working on this equipment, how long would it be before the equipment is up and running?

Some of the answers might surprise you, someone in the food industry once told me; “It would be quite a while we would probably have to clean the machine quite thoroughly before they would let us run it again so I would say at least 4 hours.

The answers I get to these questions tell me a lot about each company and the value they put on not only employee health, safety and environment but the wellbeing of each employee and their family. I have come to realize I was lucky enough to work for a company who truly valued our safety and wellbeing. We were force fed health, safety and environmental standards and regulations from the time I was an Apprentice all the way through my time as a Reliability Engineer.

Needless to say the most shocking discussion I have ever had with a company was about 10 years ago just outside of Houston, we were discussing consequence ranking criteria for failure modes, I had suggested that any failure mode that impacted employee health, safety or environment should be considered a high consequence. A Controls Engineer who worked for operations at the plant spoke up and said “As a company we already have a consequence ranking system, do you mind if we use that?”

I replied that would be great but we would need a copy of the criteria to refer to as we performed the analysis and within 5 minutes he had a copy for me to review. I looked over the document and tried to contain the shock of finding out that in order for a failure to have a high consequence at this company the incident had to garner national news coverage!

After reading the document I looked up at the group and asked two questions;

  1. How many people die in on the job accidents each day in the United States?
  2. How many of those deaths are covered on the national news?

In 2013, 4,585 workers died in on the job accidents, that’s 12.5 people a day! How many of those deaths make the national news each day? So the message here is that if one of us in this room right now were killed on the job today your company would not consider that a high consequence failure? Think about the message that sends to everyone who works here; bad press means more to this company than your life does!

Companies who understand Health, Safety and Environment and value their Employees and have a common understanding that if we pay attention to the little things the big things never happen. If we build a culture that treats a near miss the same way it treats an OSHA reportable, fewer reportable incidents occur. Companies that follow Lock Out Tag Out to the letter of the law and audit their own process build a culture where people won’t attempt to short-the process.

More important, companies who refuse to restart equipment until after a thorough incident review with Operations, Maintenance and EHS representatives send a message everyone who works there that Safety is important. They recognize that in working together to perform a thorough investigation of the incident they can determine exactly what happened and why and then work to eliminate the behaviors.

Ten years later I after learning that there are actually companies who operate today who don’t consider an on the job accident that takes the life of one of their employees or contractors a HIGH consequence, I can still remember their corporate Mission/Vision statement on safety that hung in one of their conference rooms.; “Our company is committed to safe, compliant and reliable operations through continuous improvement, capability and execution.”

I guess they forgot to add “but only if it makes the national news.”

The reality is when it comes to reducing and eliminating Health, Safety and Environmental incidents and accidents, it’s as simple as paying attention to the small things. Treat near misses as if they were an actual incident, take the time to determine the causes and look to eliminate causes and defects.

Safety isn’t a slogan, a mission or a vision, it’s a lifestyle!

Filed Under: Articles, on Maintenance Reliability, RCM Blitz

About Doug Plucknette

Doug Plucknette joined Allied Reliability Group as RCM Discipline Leader in 2007. As the founder of RCM Blitz® and author of the book Reliability Centered Maintenance using RCM Blitz®, he has provided reliability training and services to numerous companies around the world, large and small, including such Fortune 500 companies as Cargill, Whirlpool, Honda, Coors Brewing, Energizer, Corning, Invista, and Newmont Mining.

« Do Companies Need Robust Design?
Why an owner of a task or deliverable doesn’t really exist… »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

RCM Blitz® series
by Doug Plucknette

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Articles

  • Gremlins today
  • The Power of Vision in Leadership and Organizational Success
  • 3 Types of MTBF Stories
  • ALT: An in Depth Description
  • Project Email Economics

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy