Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
    • About Us
    • Colophon
    • Survey
  • Reliability.fm
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • NoMTBF
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • ASQR&R
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Maintenance Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • RCM Blitz®
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Field Reliability Data Analysis
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability by Design
      • Reliability Competence
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
      • Reliability Knowledge
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Institute of Quality & Reliability
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Statistical Methods for Failure-Time Data
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Glossary
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinar Sources
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • Your Courses
    • Live Courses
      • Introduction to Reliability Engineering & Accelerated Testings Course Landing Page
      • Advanced Accelerated Testing Course Landing Page
    • Integral Concepts Courses
      • Reliability Analysis Methods Course Landing Page
      • Applied Reliability Analysis Course Landing Page
      • Statistics, Hypothesis Testing, & Regression Modeling Course Landing Page
      • Measurement System Assessment Course Landing Page
      • SPC & Process Capability Course Landing Page
      • Design of Experiments Course Landing Page
    • The Manufacturing Academy Courses
      • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Statistics
      • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
      • Quality Engineering Statistics
      • FMEA in Practice
      • Process Capability Analysis course
      • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
      • Return on Investment online course
    • Industrial Metallurgist Courses
    • FMEA courses Powered by The Luminous Group
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • How to be an Online Student
    • Quondam Courses
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home
  • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction Course Landing Page
  • Upcoming Live Events
You are here: Home / Articles / Use the Right Fit

by Fred Schenkelberg 1 Comment

Use the Right Fit

Use the Right Fit

I’ve often railed on and on about the inappropriate use of MTBF over Reliability. The often cited rationale is, “it is simpler”. And, I agree, making simplifications is often necessary for any engineering analysis.

It goes too far when there isn’t any reason to knowingly simply when the results are misleading, inaccurate or simply wrong. The cost of making a poor decision based on faulty analysis is inexcusable.

Using even just a better fit makes a big difference. I suggest that instead of using total time divided by total failures – use the time to failure information, which you probably already have available for the analysis.

Recently, I’ve been working with a few clients with this simple recommendation. Most opt for a data analysis and plotting package that is relatively inexpensive and very easy to use – Reliasoft’s Weibull++ is one such package.

Another path open to a bit more series students is the freely available GNU license software package called R. You can learn more and download the software at

http://cran.r-project.org/

While this is primarily a statistics programing/scripting language – it is fully functional for reliability statistics, too.

The Weibulltoolkit package

This morning I ran across a package that creates Weibull plots on the appropriate Weibull scales (just like Weibull plotting graph paper). It also permits all the graphical and analysis control of R. Very powerful and flexible.

I will say the learning curve is a bit steep. It is after all a programing language. And, there are plenty of articles, books, documents, websites, courses, etc. available to get you up to speed.

I created the plot above with a single line of code

plot.wba(Surv(wbparams.to.ft(5,2,2000)),col=”red”)

The R function, plot.wba, is a slightly modified version of the command plot.wb contained within the weibulltoolkit package. You can learn more about the toolkit from the paper by Jurgen Symynck and Filip De Bal, titled “Weibull Analysis Using R, in a Nutshell.” You can find the paper at

http://mechanics.kahosl.be/fatimat/images/papers-books/paper-weibull_analysis_using_r_in_a_nutshell.pdf

Which ever software you use – avoiding the simplest route is worth the effort.

Filed Under: Articles, NoMTBF Tagged With: Regression analysis (Weibull analysis)

About Fred Schenkelberg

I am the reliability expert at FMS Reliability, a reliability engineering and management consulting firm I founded in 2004. I left Hewlett Packard (HP)’s Reliability Team, where I helped create a culture of reliability across the corporation, to assist other organizations.

« Designing with Physics of Failure
Maintenance Interval Optimization – Identifying the best Maintenance Strategy »

Comments

  1. Jalal Raei says

    March 30, 2024 at 7:29 AM

    I work in the field of reliability and my goal is to develop the culture of reliability. I am looking for a mentor. Could you be my mentor?

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The NoMTBF logo

Devoted to the eradication of the misuse of MTBF.

Photo of Fred SchenkelbergArticles by Fred Schenkelberg and guest authors

in the NoMTBF article series

Recent Posts

  • Gremlins today
  • The Power of Vision in Leadership and Organizational Success
  • 3 Types of MTBF Stories
  • ALT: An in Depth Description
  • Project Email Economics

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy