Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
    • About Us
    • Colophon
    • Survey
  • Reliability.fm
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • NoMTBF
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • ASQR&R
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Maintenance Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • RCM Blitz®
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Field Reliability Data Analysis
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability by Design
      • Reliability Competence
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
      • Reliability Knowledge
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Institute of Quality & Reliability
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Statistical Methods for Failure-Time Data
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Glossary
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinar Sources
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • Your Courses
    • Live Courses
      • Introduction to Reliability Engineering & Accelerated Testings Course Landing Page
      • Advanced Accelerated Testing Course Landing Page
    • Integral Concepts Courses
      • Reliability Analysis Methods Course Landing Page
      • Applied Reliability Analysis Course Landing Page
      • Statistics, Hypothesis Testing, & Regression Modeling Course Landing Page
      • Measurement System Assessment Course Landing Page
      • SPC & Process Capability Course Landing Page
      • Design of Experiments Course Landing Page
    • The Manufacturing Academy Courses
      • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Statistics
      • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
      • Quality Engineering Statistics
      • FMEA in Practice
      • Process Capability Analysis course
      • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
      • Return on Investment online course
    • Industrial Metallurgist Courses
    • FMEA courses Powered by The Luminous Group
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • How to be an Online Student
    • Quondam Courses
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home
  • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction Course Landing Page
  • Upcoming Live Events
You are here: Home / Articles / Retaining Knowledge to Reduce Risks

by Greg Hutchins Leave a Comment

Retaining Knowledge to Reduce Risks

Retaining Knowledge to Reduce Risks

Guest Post by Umberto Tunesi (first posted on CERM ® RISK INSIGHTS – reposted here with permission)

Mens Sana in Corpore Sano (A Sound Mind in a Sound Body).

It could also be translated that quality of life is more important than the span of life, the number of years you live.

Or that medicine’s task is not to add years to your life but the life to your years.

And it might also be that such a formula for life – originally a Juvenal’s wish or prayer – is much more ancient than its Latin transcription.

LACK OF EXPERIENCE RISK

Mostly in the western hemisphere, and where the western ways of living are more accepted, there’s a lot of knowledge, experience, skills, even culture, that are laid to waste.  Let me explain:

Many people retire due to age.  Many people are made to retire because of redundant work-places or because governments encourage employers to hire young, unexperienced employees / manpower because of tax reduction or other reasons.  In one way or another, the wealth of knowledge, experience and skills go away when older folks leave.

Nothing against the newcomers, of course: they are very updated with the latest knowledge of their disciplines, and of the intrinsic technology tools.

But they lack experience.

Junior generations are probably the most fertile ground for innovative projects but – as we’ll see in a few lines – they lack what their seniors would define as “walking on solid ground”.

It’s typical of youth to think that everything’s possible, that any thing can be accomplished and at almost no risk.

Almost: they lack the knowledge of failures and their cost.

On broad terms, of course: if this can be a rule, it can only be generic; however, it gives the temperature of the difference between seniors’ and juniors’ approach.

DECISION RISKS

According to Historians, Julius Caesar pronounced – what later became almost a battle hymn – Alea Jacta Est (The Die Is Cast) in 49 B.C.

But we’ve to be aware that Caesar’s term alea refers die only in terms of probability, we’d rather use the word dice, instead, as in Marquis de Laplace’s A Philosophical Essay on Probabilities.

When Caesar addresses his troops, he’s in front of the Rubicon river, a border, and he’s well aware that once he’d crossed it, he would have declared war to Rome, he will have Rome against him.

He’s aware of the risks he will incur into but the decision has been taken, the die was cast, for the good or for the bad.

Veni, Vidi, Vici (I Came, I Saw, I Conquered) was what Caesar wrote to the Roman Senate some three years later the die had been cast.

Here, too, the origins of both sentences might be much more ancient than Caesar’s; but, if we read them together we find what’s the essence of risk management.
That is, from risk management planning to risk assessment to risk evaluation to risk reduction or elimination.

EQUIVALENT EXCHANGE

In many cases, employers believe they can do without seniors.  Why?  They are slow to learn new technologies.  They cuddle the company as if it was their own nephew, and so on.

In such cases, employers – and their managers – run a severe, under-valued risk specifically to deprive the company of very valuable resources in times of crisis, that is when risks have to be detected and fought with the utmost energy.  This risk is even greater if the social impacts are considered.  Seniors, both men and women, who spent their lives working, often very committed to their company or employer, are left without a job.

They feel redundant also in the society, non only in the company.

Those who get away with part-time jobs are the lucky ones even if they are not paid.
But not everybody is ready to volunteer to care for babies, elders, or the disabled.

Why not make good use of the knowledge, experience, and skills accumulated in decades of work, therefore?

No one can ever know any company better than a man or a woman who long worked in it.
And if we think that risk auditors / assessors should be all muscles, body-build, super-heroes, we are very wrong.  The best inspectors we read of in crime stories were grizzled veterans..

I would therefore suggest any company owner or manager truly wanting to campaign against organization breaking risks to consider – at least – to propose that seniors become trusted advisors so their knowledge and wisdom can be retained.

Everyone wins.  The organization retains its knowledge.  Seniors feel valued for their contributions.

Filed Under: Articles, CERM® Risk Insights, on Risk & Safety

About Greg Hutchins

Greg Hutchins PE CERM is the evangelist of Future of Quality: Risk®. He has been involved in quality since 1985 when he set up the first quality program in North America based on Mil Q 9858 for the natural gas industry. Mil Q became ISO 9001 in 1987

He is the author of more than 30 books. ISO 31000: ERM is the best-selling and highest-rated ISO risk book on Amazon (4.8 stars). Value Added Auditing (4th edition) is the first ISO risk-based auditing book.

« Stress in Metals
Software Design For Reliability »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

CERM® Risk Insights series Article by Greg Hutchins, Editor and noted guest authors

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Articles

  • Gremlins today
  • The Power of Vision in Leadership and Organizational Success
  • 3 Types of MTBF Stories
  • ALT: An in Depth Description
  • Project Email Economics

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy