Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
    • About Us
    • Colophon
    • Survey
  • Reliability.fm
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • NoMTBF
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • ASQR&R
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Maintenance Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • RCM Blitz®
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Field Reliability Data Analysis
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability by Design
      • Reliability Competence
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
      • Reliability Knowledge
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Institute of Quality & Reliability
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Statistical Methods for Failure-Time Data
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Glossary
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinar Sources
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • Your Courses
    • Live Courses
      • Introduction to Reliability Engineering & Accelerated Testings Course Landing Page
      • Advanced Accelerated Testing Course Landing Page
    • Integral Concepts Courses
      • Reliability Analysis Methods Course Landing Page
      • Applied Reliability Analysis Course Landing Page
      • Statistics, Hypothesis Testing, & Regression Modeling Course Landing Page
      • Measurement System Assessment Course Landing Page
      • SPC & Process Capability Course Landing Page
      • Design of Experiments Course Landing Page
    • The Manufacturing Academy Courses
      • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Statistics
      • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
      • Quality Engineering Statistics
      • FMEA in Practice
      • Process Capability Analysis course
      • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
      • Return on Investment online course
    • Industrial Metallurgist Courses
    • FMEA courses Powered by The Luminous Group
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • How to be an Online Student
    • Quondam Courses
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home
  • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction Course Landing Page
  • Upcoming Live Events
You are here: Home / Articles / Reliability and Cost Reduction

by Fred Schenkelberg Leave a Comment

Reliability and Cost Reduction

Reliability and Cost Reduction

I do not like procurement organizations.

It is like saying you don’t like lawyers. I don’t know all procurement engineers or managers, so understand my statement is a grand generalization. It’s not the people I don’t like, it’s a common behavior that I’ve witnessed countless times that I do not like.

Procurement organizations tend to look for ways to reduce cost by purchasing less expensive components or materials. This is often done with little regard to the impact on product reliability.

Why is this? And what can we do as reliability professionals to change this behavior?

Isolated Costs

One of the problems of the procurement organization is that they are focused on one of the largest identified costs of a product- the cost of the components included within the product. The cost of the components is a viable target.

Substituting a similar component for a higher cost one shows direct cost reduction and improved profit.

What is often missed is the impact on yield during manufacturing and field reliability in the hands of customers. I’ll leave the adverse impact on manufacturing yield to the interested reader to pursue elsewhere. The impact on reliability is delayed and may even be difficult to measure.

The focus on what is immediately available to measure is short-sighted and may lead to erosion of profit and market share due to poor product reliability.

Less expensive components may not be the same

Vendors are working to reduce costs to meet the demand of their customers.

They automate processes, reduce waste, streamline processes, and simplify designs. They reduce performance margins, increase internal heating, increase process variation, and reduce the robustness of their products.

Less expensive components may perform as well or better than more expensive parts, yet that is rarely the case in my experience.

Less expensive components generally have a higher field failure rate, and it doesn’t take much of a change in failure rate to erase any cost savings created.

FET cost reduction example

Let’s say we have a product with a circuit board that contains a field effect transistor (FET). The FET costs \$0.10 (completely hypothetical example using simple numbers to illustrate the point).

We plan on manufacturing and selling 1,000 units each with a one year warranty from date of purchase. Customers use the unit about 1,000 hours each year.

Our dutiful procurement engineer notices that the same vendor offers a very similar FET that costs half as much, \$0.05 and suggests the we switch the the lower cost component.
The proposed change would save \$0.05 x 1,000 = \$50. Not a big amount, yet in the right direction according to the metrics used by the procurement organization.

Reliability impact of proposal

We need a couple pieces of information in order to determine change in field reliability and impact on warranty.
First we need the expected component failure rates. For this example, let’s use the following (FIT is failures in time, here failures per 109 hours of use):

$0.10 FET has a FIT of 13,333
0.05 FET has a FIT of 20,000

You can use the exponential distribution reliability function to determine the probability of a FET surviving one year (in this example, 1,000 hours).

$$  \large\displaystyle R(t)={{e}^{-\lambda t}}$$

Where t (time) in this example is 1,000 hours
And, lambda is the failure rate, in the ten cent FET case 13,333 x 10-9
Resulting in:

0.10 FET has a one year reliability of 0.987
0.05 FET has a one year reliability of 0.98

At this point the procurement engineer will say something like “Great, that isn’t a big change, let’s do it.”

Let’s continue the calculations to estimate the number of failures we will expect to incur across the 1,000 units. This is the probability of failure or one minus the reliability times the number of units. Resulting in the expected number of failed units in a year:

FET has 13.25 expected failures
0.05 FET has 20 expected failures

 

Raising the cost of failure

That is an 6.75 expected increase in unit failures. Which brings up the cost of failure. We do not replace just the FET when it fails, we replace the entire circuit board and often replace the entire box or system involved.

In this example lets say the average cost of a field failure under warranty is 250 (a relatively low value in most cases when including the cost of the replacement unit, call center costs, shipping/handling, failure analysis, engineering time, loss of future sales, brand erosion, etc.)

Therefore, the savings of \$50 buy using the lower cost component will result in an increase of warranty costs of 6.75 x $250 or 1,698.50 (roughly).

 

Summary

If making this clear to the procurement team is not sufficient to stop the component cost reduction nonsense, then find someone that cares about the bottom line and customer satisfaction.

What is often missing in an organization is the cost per failure. Along with a simple estimate of the change in failure rate we can estimate the total cost when ’saving’ money with lower priced components.

Filed Under: Articles, Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics, on Product Reliability

About Fred Schenkelberg

I am the reliability expert at FMS Reliability, a reliability engineering and management consulting firm I founded in 2004. I left Hewlett Packard (HP)’s Reliability Team, where I helped create a culture of reliability across the corporation, to assist other organizations.

« Field Industry and Public Failure Data
Reliability is Not Just Statistics »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Article by Fred Schenkelberg
in the Musings series

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Articles

  • Leadership Values in Maintenance and Operations
  • Today’s Gremlin – It’ll never work here
  • How a Mission Statement Drives Behavioral Change in Organizations
  • Gremlins today
  • The Power of Vision in Leadership and Organizational Success

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy