Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
    • About Us
    • Colophon
    • Survey
  • Reliability.fm
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • NoMTBF
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • ASQR&R
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Maintenance Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • RCM Blitz®
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Field Reliability Data Analysis
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability by Design
      • Reliability Competence
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
      • Reliability Knowledge
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Institute of Quality & Reliability
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Statistical Methods for Failure-Time Data
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Glossary
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinar Sources
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • Your Courses
    • Live Courses
      • Introduction to Reliability Engineering & Accelerated Testings Course Landing Page
      • Advanced Accelerated Testing Course Landing Page
    • Integral Concepts Courses
      • Reliability Analysis Methods Course Landing Page
      • Applied Reliability Analysis Course Landing Page
      • Statistics, Hypothesis Testing, & Regression Modeling Course Landing Page
      • Measurement System Assessment Course Landing Page
      • SPC & Process Capability Course Landing Page
      • Design of Experiments Course Landing Page
    • The Manufacturing Academy Courses
      • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Statistics
      • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
      • Quality Engineering Statistics
      • FMEA in Practice
      • Process Capability Analysis course
      • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
      • Return on Investment online course
    • Industrial Metallurgist Courses
    • FMEA courses Powered by The Luminous Group
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • How to be an Online Student
    • Quondam Courses
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home
  • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction Course Landing Page
  • Upcoming Live Events
You are here: Home / Articles / Reliability Centered Maintenance – Common Questions

by Doug Plucknette 1 Comment

Reliability Centered Maintenance – Common Questions

Reliability Centered Maintenance – Common Questions

When is the best time to do an RCM analysis on your equipment?

While RCM Blitz™ can be applied at any time in the asset lifecycle, the best time to do an RCM analysis is in the design phase of a capital project. Reliability Centered Design is much more than a thorough RCM analysis on a critical asset, it also uses other reliability tools that should be applied at each gate of your capital process such as Reliability Block Diagrams, Criticality Analysis, and Spare Parts Assessment. While many companies have been reluctant to spend the extra money to add RCM to their capital process, those that have report an insignificant addition of 1-3% in the total cost of the project. The savings for building reliability into your capital process are recognized early on as Installation, accreditation and start-up phases of your project will be quicker/more successful than other project launches.

Why can’t we just use a library of failure modes to develop the maintenance strategy for our equipment?  

All Failure Modes Libraries are built using common or engineered Failure Modes that one would expect to experience with a given component or part. While each of these Failure Modes is valid, they are rarely the Failure Modes that you are experiencing at your facility. Simply put, these are the same Failure Modes a OEM would use to create the maintenance plan in the manual that comes with your asset. While some of these Failure Modes might apply and deliver a list of basic PM (Preventive Maintenance) and PdM (Predictive Maintenance, Condition Based Maintenance, On-Condition Maintenance) tasks, they will NOT deliver the level of reliability you are looking for. RCM when properly applied addresses the Failure Modes that result from the context in which operate the asset and the environment in which it operates. It is these Failure Modes that result in significant repetitive and random cause failures that have a direct impact on the operational capability of the equipment as well as the safety and environmental performance of your facility.

Why do so many companies struggle to implement a successful, sustained RCM program?

If you ask the companies themselves, there are several answers to this question each amounts to nothing more than an excuse. If you failed to develop a sustained reliability effort you failed at one or more of the following:

Leadership – A good Reliability Program, or RCM effort requires a strong leader. I’m not talking about a Military General here but someone who understands the concepts of Reliability well enough to develop a plan and who can influence people in key roles to help fulfill that plan.

Structure – In order to get the most from your equipment, you need the foundation elements of a good Asset Management Program in place. A CMMS that has a complete listing of your equipment hierarchy to the component level that meets ISO 14224 standards. A criticality analysis performed to the component level with a distribution of numbers equal to the square root of the number of assets at your facility. And lastly, people who are trained to be able to plan and schedule the work required to maintain your equipment.

Discipline – Last, but not least is Discipline! We must have the discipline to identify and complete the work we identify on a daily, weekly, monthly, and annual basis. And, we must stick to the principals of Reliability Centered Maintenance that say when a Potential Failure has been identified through Condition Monitoring, we will plan, schedule and replace the item before secondary damage occurs. Discipline in terms of RCM also includes the application of precision maintenance techniques when replacing failed items. We will from here on out take the time to make sure our rotating equipment is properly aligned and balanced, we will ensure our trades people have the proper training and tools to perform their jobs to the highest standards. Lastly, Discipline is sticking to the plan put together by your leaders. Its very easy to get excited about a good RCM program and the next thing you know someone is wanting to do twice as many RCM’s as planned and the next thing you know your up to your ears in tasks that need to be implemented. It’s important to remember, the work we identify and perform through RCM sets our organization up to be successful. So, if someone wants more, we will need the resources to do more.

Is RCM Blitz™ a shortcut RCM process?

No. RCM Blitz™ fully complies to the SAE RCM standards (JA-1011, JA-1012) meaning it follows the 7 step traditional RCM process

What makes RCM Blitz™ different from other Traditional RCM Methodologies?

When we look at traditional RCM methodologies, the 7 steps are identical. What we did to make RCM Blitz™ quicker and therefore more tolerable was to design a database that allows for live facilitation of the RCM process while simultaneously entering the information into each field. The database, which allows the user to upload ISO 14224 compliant asset hierarchy makes the transition from asset to component to Failure Mode seamless making the transfer of information from the RCM database to your CMMS much easier when it comes to implementation.

Filed Under: Articles, on Maintenance Reliability, RCM Blitz

About Doug Plucknette

Doug Plucknette joined Allied Reliability Group as RCM Discipline Leader in 2007. As the founder of RCM Blitz® and author of the book Reliability Centered Maintenance using RCM Blitz®, he has provided reliability training and services to numerous companies around the world, large and small, including such Fortune 500 companies as Cargill, Whirlpool, Honda, Coors Brewing, Energizer, Corning, Invista, and Newmont Mining.

« Is a Task a Deliverable?
Set Up of New Equipment »

Comments

  1. Larry George says

    December 26, 2018 at 12:46 PM

    1. Would you explain, “A criticality analysis performed to the component level with a distribution of numbers equal to the square root of the number of assets at your facility. “? That’s interesting
    2. How do you classify parts’ failure rate functions according to inpsection, monitoring, PM, repair, replacement, or nothing at all?
    3. How do you classify failure rate functions a la Nowlan and Heap if parts are not tracked to get (a sample of) life data?

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

RCM Blitz® series
by Doug Plucknette

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Articles

  • Gremlins today
  • The Power of Vision in Leadership and Organizational Success
  • 3 Types of MTBF Stories
  • ALT: An in Depth Description
  • Project Email Economics

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy