Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
    • About Us
    • Colophon
    • Survey
  • Reliability.fm
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • NoMTBF
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • ASQR&R
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Maintenance Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • RCM Blitz®
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Field Reliability Data Analysis
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability by Design
      • Reliability Competence
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
      • Reliability Knowledge
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Institute of Quality & Reliability
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Statistical Methods for Failure-Time Data
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Glossary
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinar Sources
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • Your Courses
    • Live Courses
      • Introduction to Reliability Engineering & Accelerated Testings Course Landing Page
      • Advanced Accelerated Testing Course Landing Page
    • Integral Concepts Courses
      • Reliability Analysis Methods Course Landing Page
      • Applied Reliability Analysis Course Landing Page
      • Statistics, Hypothesis Testing, & Regression Modeling Course Landing Page
      • Measurement System Assessment Course Landing Page
      • SPC & Process Capability Course Landing Page
      • Design of Experiments Course Landing Page
    • The Manufacturing Academy Courses
      • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Statistics
      • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
      • Quality Engineering Statistics
      • FMEA in Practice
      • Process Capability Analysis course
      • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
      • Return on Investment online course
    • Industrial Metallurgist Courses
    • FMEA courses Powered by The Luminous Group
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • How to be an Online Student
    • Quondam Courses
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home
  • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction Course Landing Page
  • Upcoming Live Events
You are here: Home / Articles / Reliability and Root Sum Squared Tolerances

by Fred Schenkelberg 2 Comments

Reliability and Root Sum Squared Tolerances

Reliability and Root Sum Squared Tolerances

The root sum squared (RSS) method is a statistical tolerance analysis method. In many cases, the actual individual part dimensions fall near the center of the tolerance range with very few parts with actual dimensions near the tolerance limits.

This, of course, assumes the part dimensions are tightly grouped and within the tolerance range.

Setting tolerances well, using the best available data about the part(s) variation, allows creating designs that function well given the expected part variation. This is better for reliable performance. Also, the same method can be applied when the loads and stresses are normally distributed.

Check that assumption with you data first, of course.

In the root sum squared tolerances method, one assumes that the normal distribution describes the variation of dimensions. The bell-shaped curve is symmetrical and fully described with two parameters, the mean μ and the standard deviation σ.

[NOTE: Checkout the ebook Statistical Tolerance Analysis]

The variances, not the standard deviations, are additive and provide an estimate of the combined part variation. The result of adding the means and taking the root sum square of the standard deviations provides an estimate of the normal distribution of the tolerance stack. The formula to combine the standard deviations of the stack is

$$ \large\displaystyle \sigma_{sys}=\sqrt{\sum\nolimits_{i=1}^{n}{\sigma_{i}^{2}}}$$

where σi; is the standard deviation of the ith part and n is the number of parts in the stack.


 

Normal-Curve

The normal distribution has the property that approximately 68.2% of the values fall within one standard deviation (1σ) of the mean. Likewise, 95.4% fall within two standard deviations (2σ), and 99.7% fall within three standard deviations (3σ). The plot above shows the probability for various regions relative to the standard deviations away from the mean.

Simple Example

Using the same example as with the worst-case method, we have five plates, each of which will have a different dimension. For any given set of five, we do not know the five individual dimensions, yet we can estimate what those dimensions will be using statistics.

On average, the plates are 25 mm thick. Assuming that each part will be slightly different than the average value and that the normal distribution describes the variation, we then need to estimate the standard deviation of the part thickness.

For this example let’s measure 30 plates and calculate the standard deviation. If we find that the standard deviation is 0.33 mm we know that most parts will have dimensions within the tolerance of 0.99 mm, if the parts follow a normal distribution (and how to check this assumption will be discussed later). This is our estimate of how the part thickness actually varies.

When you stack five blocks, the average thickness will 5 times the mean thickness, or 125 mm.

We expect approximately 99.7% of the stacks of five blocks to have the combined thickness to be within the range of plus or minus 3σ of the combined plates. To combine the standard deviations we use the formula to add the variances and convert back to standard deviation with a square root.

In this case, we add the five variances, 0.332, and take the square root of that sum:

$$ \large \displaystyle  \sigma_{sys}=\sqrt{\sum\nolimits_{i=1}^{5}{0.33_{i}^{2}}}=0.7379$$

Since approximately 99.7% of the values are within ± 3σ, the range of combined thickness values for the stack of five plates should be within 125 ± (3 × 0.7379 or 2.2137) mm, or most fall between 122.79 and 127.21 mm.

To estimate the number of assemblies outside the desired tolerance we can use the system normal distribution values; in this case, the mean μ is 125, and the standard deviation σ is 0.7379. Within Excel, you can use the NORMDIST function. In general, construct the cell as follows:

=(NORMDIST(Mean+Tolerance, Mean, σsys)-0.5)*2

where the mean is that of the combined means of the parts involved in the stack. In this example the system mean is 125 mm.

The tolerance is the desired value. In this examples let’s assume that we would like the total stack to be within 2 mm of the mean, or a tolerance of 2.

σsys is the standard deviation of the combined parts found by using the RSS standard deviations of the parts involved.

We subtract 0.5 to find the one-sided probability of the result, being below the maximum value (mean plus tolerance), and we multiply the resulting probability by 2 to find the chance that the final assembly is either above or below the desired tolerance.

In this example, for a tolerance of 2 mm, we would expect 99.33% of assemblies to have a thickness within 125 ± 2 mm. This implies that we should expect one assembly out of about 300 to result in a thickness either thinner than 123 mm or thicker than 127 mm.

By varying the tolerance in the calculation we can estimate the scrap or defect rate and compare the cost of scrap and failure to the cost of tighter individual part tolerances.

Best Practices and Assumptions

The normal distribution assumption relies on the process variation having many small perturbations that generally add to create the final dimension. It is best to actually measure approximately 30 samples to estimate the mean and standard deviation.

When gathering measurements is not feasible, then assuming that the parts will have dimensions centered within the tolerance range and have ±3σ across the tolerance range is a conservative starting assumption. Of course, this implies that the part creation process is capable of creating 99.7% of the parts within the tolerance specifications.

If measuring fewer than 30 parts to estimate the standard deviation, be sure to use the sample standard deviation formula.

$$ \large\displaystyle \sigma=\sqrt{{{\sum\nolimits_{i=1}^{N}{\left({x_{i}-\overline{x}}\right)}^{2}}\over{N-1}}}$$

where N is the number of samples, xi is the ith measurement, and x̄ is the sample mean of the samples.

Related:

Reliability and tolerance Analysis (Recorded Webinar)

Why do Tolerance Analysis (article)

Reliability and Monte Carlo Determined Tolerances (article)


Statistical Tolerance Analysis - Basic Introduction by Fred Schenkelberg book cover
This quick introduction to three statistical analysis methods enables you to quickly determine or assess part tolerances. Plus, you will learn why tolerances are critical to achieving a reliability product or system.

Please login with your site registration to immediately download this ebook which includes step by step examples and details on the data you need to get started today.

[popup type=”” link_text=”Login” link_class=”button”]

[/popup]

If you haven’t registered, it’s free and takes only a moment.

Join Accendo Reliability


Filed Under: Articles, Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics, on Product Reliability Tagged With: Tolerance analysis

About Fred Schenkelberg

I am the reliability expert at FMS Reliability, a reliability engineering and management consulting firm I founded in 2004. I left Hewlett Packard (HP)’s Reliability Team, where I helped create a culture of reliability across the corporation, to assist other organizations.

« Upcoming live online CRE Prep course
The Normal Distribution »

Comments

  1. Lloyd R Jones says

    April 9, 2020 at 1:12 PM

    Great article except that it looks like you need to square the (measure – mean) term in the sample standard deviation formula.

    Thanks!

    Reply
    • Fred Schenkelberg says

      April 9, 2020 at 1:16 PM

      Thanks for letting me know Lloyd and thanks for the kind words, too.

      Corrected.

      Cheers,

      Fred

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Article by Fred Schenkelberg
in the Musings series

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Articles

  • Gremlins today
  • The Power of Vision in Leadership and Organizational Success
  • 3 Types of MTBF Stories
  • ALT: An in Depth Description
  • Project Email Economics

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy