Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
    • About Us
    • Colophon
    • Survey
  • Reliability.fm
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • NoMTBF
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • ASQR&R
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Maintenance Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • RCM Blitz®
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Field Reliability Data Analysis
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability by Design
      • Reliability Competence
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
      • Reliability Knowledge
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Institute of Quality & Reliability
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Statistical Methods for Failure-Time Data
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Glossary
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinar Sources
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • Your Courses
    • Live Courses
      • Introduction to Reliability Engineering & Accelerated Testings Course Landing Page
      • Advanced Accelerated Testing Course Landing Page
    • Integral Concepts Courses
      • Reliability Analysis Methods Course Landing Page
      • Applied Reliability Analysis Course Landing Page
      • Statistics, Hypothesis Testing, & Regression Modeling Course Landing Page
      • Measurement System Assessment Course Landing Page
      • SPC & Process Capability Course Landing Page
      • Design of Experiments Course Landing Page
    • The Manufacturing Academy Courses
      • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Statistics
      • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
      • Quality Engineering Statistics
      • FMEA in Practice
      • Process Capability Analysis course
      • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
      • Return on Investment online course
    • Industrial Metallurgist Courses
    • FMEA courses Powered by The Luminous Group
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • How to be an Online Student
    • Quondam Courses
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home
  • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction Course Landing Page
  • Upcoming Live Events
You are here: Home / Articles / Red Alert: Your Culture Is Hurting Your Reliability Efforts

by James Kovacevic Leave a Comment

Red Alert: Your Culture Is Hurting Your Reliability Efforts

Red Alert: Your Culture Is Hurting Your Reliability Efforts

The Warning Signs That You Need a Culture Change

Imagine working within (or maybe you don’t need to imagine it) an organization in which everything is completely reactive.  You arrive early to try and organize the work for the day, yet only to find out someone else is there doing it.

During the course of the day, there are multiple failures and all are followed with “I told John that was making noise a few days ago.”  You inquire if the operator submitted a work request and you receive the response “That’s maintenance’s job”.

Unfortunately, this a common scene played out in many plants and organizations each day, but it doesn’t have to be.  The majority of the issues seen in this scene can be traced back to the culture of the organization.  When you have a great culture, you will be successful.  As Peter Drucker has stated “Culture eats strategy for breakfast” and he is 100% right.

Without a good culture, no tool (whether it is RCM, RCA, or PdM) will improve reliability.   Reliability begins with people, and culture is made up of the people.  Over the course of the next 5 blog posts, I will discuss how to;

  • identify a poor culture
  • start a culture change
  • getting the right people on board
  • accelerating the change
  • and sustaining the change.

Starting with an identifying a poor culture, here are the top 4 ways to identify a poor culture.

Lack of Roles & Responsibilities

In many organizations the issues with the culture is not with the technicians, but with the maintenance leadership team.  Without Roles & Responsibilities, the planners, supervisors and storeroom staff will not function as a team.  This leads to work being duplicated by many people, and other work not being completed.

Without the maintenance leadership team aligned, how do you expect the technicians and operations team to believe in the maintenance & reliability program?

The Blame Game

Another sign of a poor culture, is the presence of the blame game.  This is the constant battle that many organizations face, and it a sign of a mis-aligned or poor culture.  Typically, the blame games has Maintenance blaming operations for running the equipment into the ground, and operations blaming maintenance for not maintaining it.

This constant back and forth further drives the culture into the ground, as the people become segregated into their own team.

“It’s Not My Job”

“It’s not my job”, is very much related to the blame game, but takes it to another level.  It is one thing when something fails, but when that failure was detected and progressed because no one was notified, is another.  This is seen in many organizations, as operations feel that notifying maintenance of equipment issues is not their job.  Maintenance feels it is not their job to identify these issues as operations uses the equipment everyday.

This is a dead giveaway of a poor culture, and until this is overcome you will never improve reliability.

Not Matter What, It’s Always Reactive

Maintenance & Reliability has many tools available, such as RCM, FMEA, RCA, PdM, etc. Organizations that deploy many of these tools, fail to see any improvements in Reliability, why is that?The lack of culture.  So if you have utilized these tools successfully and have not seen any improvement, look to your culture.  Chances are the issue is there.

To summarize the 4 signs of a poor culture are;

  • Lack of Roles & Responsibilities
  • The Blame Game
  • “It’s Not My Job”
  • No Matter What, It’s Always Reactive

Having the right culture is critical to the success of your maintenance & reliability program.  So how many of these signs do you have in your organization?  What have you done to overcome these?

It is only by changing the culture that you can improve the reliability of your assets.  Reliability is based on people and so is culture, so focus on the culture and reliability will follow.

In the next post I will cover how to begin laying the ground work or foundations for a culture change.

Remember, to find success, you must first solve the problem, then achieve the implementation of the solution, and finally sustain winning results.

I’m James Kovacevic
Eruditio, LLC
Where Education Meets Application

Follow @ReliableJames
Follow @EruditioLLC
Follow @HPReliability

 

References & Related Materials:

STOP! Break the Reactive Cycle with Roles & Responsibilities
RCM2 by John Moubray
Root Cause Analysis Made Simple
The Basics of FMEA

 

Image Credit:
Charging Bull – New York City by Sam Valadi

Filed Under: Articles, Maintenance and Reliability, on Maintenance Reliability Tagged With: Change Management

About James Kovacevic

James is a trainer, speaker, and consultant that specializes in bringing profitability, productivity, availability, and sustainability to manufacturers around the globe.

Through his career, James has made it his personal mission to make industry a profitable place; where individuals and manufacturers possess the resources, knowledge, and courage to sustainably lower their operating costs.

« Why Most ERM Systems Don’t Work
Strategy »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Maintenance & Reliability series


by James Kovacevic

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Articles

  • Leadership Values in Maintenance and Operations
  • Today’s Gremlin – It’ll never work here
  • How a Mission Statement Drives Behavioral Change in Organizations
  • Gremlins today
  • The Power of Vision in Leadership and Organizational Success

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy