Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
    • About Us
    • Colophon
    • Survey
  • Reliability.fm
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • NoMTBF
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • ASQR&R
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Maintenance Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • RCM Blitz®
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Field Reliability Data Analysis
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability by Design
      • Reliability Competence
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
      • Reliability Knowledge
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Institute of Quality & Reliability
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Statistical Methods for Failure-Time Data
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Glossary
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinar Sources
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • Your Courses
    • Live Courses
      • Introduction to Reliability Engineering & Accelerated Testings Course Landing Page
      • Advanced Accelerated Testing Course Landing Page
    • Integral Concepts Courses
      • Reliability Analysis Methods Course Landing Page
      • Applied Reliability Analysis Course Landing Page
      • Statistics, Hypothesis Testing, & Regression Modeling Course Landing Page
      • Measurement System Assessment Course Landing Page
      • SPC & Process Capability Course Landing Page
      • Design of Experiments Course Landing Page
    • The Manufacturing Academy Courses
      • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Statistics
      • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
      • Quality Engineering Statistics
      • FMEA in Practice
      • Process Capability Analysis course
      • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
      • Return on Investment online course
    • Industrial Metallurgist Courses
    • FMEA courses Powered by The Luminous Group
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • How to be an Online Student
    • Quondam Courses
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home
  • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction Course Landing Page
  • Upcoming Live Events
You are here: Home / Articles / RCA Templates Again

by Kevin Stewart Leave a Comment

RCA Templates Again

RCA Templates Again

RCA Templates Can Be Used

In my last article,  RCA Templates Use or not?, I discussed templates and suggested that while beneficial for many things, they may not provide as much value for those doing RCA’s.  This is because for any specific effect, the variability in the cause tree is significant and difficult to predict.  This doesn’t mean that there are no options to utilize templates to help speed up the process, but perhaps not in the way that people might be used to.

Helpful Hints

In this week’s article, I want to discuss some of the things that do occur and can be helpful.  RCA Templates can be large or small, and I find that similar cause and effect scenarios will pop up.  My experience is that the more binary the situation, the easier it is for a small template to apply.  For anyone who isn’t familiar with the term binary, Merriam-Webster defines binary as “compounded or consisting of or marked by two things or parts.”   In my way of thinking, this applies to an effect that is binary.  For instance, consider the following graphic:

picture 1
In this causal element, you can make a case that for the effect shown, you could always use a structure as shown.  Someone either intends to violate a known rule (error of intent), or they made an error of judgement of some sort (error of action).  I’ve shown it here as a logical “or” element, indicating that it is one of the two, not both.  If you knew which of the two it was, you could select it and delete the other and continue.  Unfortunately, as mentioned in the previous article, the next choices start branching out quickly due to the many different ways people choose to violate known rules, or why they make errors of judgement.   What you will find is that after doing several RCA’s, you may start to see some of the same causes come up such as “procedure not followed.”  Most likely you would remember the above causal element and fill in the blanks, but if you wanted to, you could keep these causal element templates, categorize them, and make them searchable so that you could find them easily.

Another possible causal element template might be the following graphic:

picture 2The Binary Characteristic

The characteristic I believe is common between these two examples is the causal element is binary.  Binary means there are few choices available that describe the causal element and when the effect comes up in an analysis, the causes are, or should be, almost identical.

Similar Failure Modes

Another scenario where you might find a variation of templating valuable is when you have similar issues with a common equipment item. I performed an analysis once where there were multiple failure modes on a similar valve. The first analysis took several days, but after that, they started going faster and faster. The cause of this was that individual components could sometimes only fail in a binary fashion. This allowed us to look at sections of past analyses and cut and paste to another analysis, saving significant time. Having done many RCA’s at my plant, I would say I never had a situation where I attempted to analyze multiple failure modes on similar equipment, so I am not sure that would come up on a regular basis. This might be because once you get a problem solved, you are on to the next, which is usually in another area or involves a different piece of equipment. Seeing the similarities on an individual piece of equipment takes a dedicated effort to specifically pull all RCA’s and look at them. However, by the time you will have done several, they are already done and the value to copy may not be there. It also takes a fair amount of time to do that analysis. I find that I can generate a lot of causes quickly with the right people in the room and haven’t yet seen the value in stopping to find a template inside some RCA I did at some time in the past.

I do find, however, that I remember the common causal elements and their binary connections which allows me to put them down quickly and move on. Sometimes you may remember that a template exists but not the exact wording. This is fine, as you can put a placeholder in your chart and then go look up the specific wording later and make minor changes. This allows you to be consistent in the application of certain causal elements

Have You Found Any Causal RCA Templates?

What are other binary elements you have come across? If I get enough, I can put them together and list in a blog. I would be grateful if you would send me your thoughts.

Filed Under: Articles, on Tools & Techniques, Reliability Reflections Tagged With: Root Cause Analysis (RCA)

About Kevin Stewart

Welcome to Accendo Reliability – join us and learn the art and craft of reliability engineering

I am an experienced educator and maintenance/reliability professional with 38 years of practical work experience in a variety of roles for ALCOA Primary Metals Group and ARMS Reliability.

« The Need to Improve the Reliability Narrative
Telematics Data Analytics Overview »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Articles by Kevin Stewart
in the Reliability Reflections series

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Articles

  • Gremlins today
  • The Power of Vision in Leadership and Organizational Success
  • 3 Types of MTBF Stories
  • ALT: An in Depth Description
  • Project Email Economics

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy