Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
    • About Us
    • Colophon
    • Survey
  • Reliability.fm
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • NoMTBF
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • ASQR&R
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Maintenance Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • RCM Blitz®
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Field Reliability Data Analysis
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability by Design
      • Reliability Competence
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
      • Reliability Knowledge
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Institute of Quality & Reliability
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Statistical Methods for Failure-Time Data
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Glossary
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinar Sources
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • Your Courses
    • Live Courses
      • Introduction to Reliability Engineering & Accelerated Testings Course Landing Page
      • Advanced Accelerated Testing Course Landing Page
    • Integral Concepts Courses
      • Reliability Analysis Methods Course Landing Page
      • Applied Reliability Analysis Course Landing Page
      • Statistics, Hypothesis Testing, & Regression Modeling Course Landing Page
      • Measurement System Assessment Course Landing Page
      • SPC & Process Capability Course Landing Page
      • Design of Experiments Course Landing Page
    • The Manufacturing Academy Courses
      • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Statistics
      • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
      • Quality Engineering Statistics
      • FMEA in Practice
      • Process Capability Analysis course
      • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
      • Return on Investment online course
    • Industrial Metallurgist Courses
    • FMEA courses Powered by The Luminous Group
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • How to be an Online Student
    • Quondam Courses
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home
  • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction Course Landing Page
  • Upcoming Live Events
You are here: Home / Articles / Quantify Your Improvements with Maintenance Planning & Scheduling

by James Kovacevic 1 Comment

Quantify Your Improvements with Maintenance Planning & Scheduling

Quantify Your Improvements with Maintenance Planning & Scheduling

Being able to communicate the improvements with Maintenance Planning & Scheduling with finance and senior leaders can be difficult.   The maintenance team sees a high PM Compliance, or more work being complete, but what does that mean for the business in tangible benefits? This is where the communication between maintenance and finance breakdown.   By being able to identify and link the maintenance improvements to financial returns, maintenance will be able to generate support for current and future projects.

I remember trying to communicate with a finance person on how a CMMS would benefit the business.   He could see how the CMMS would help with managing the system, but what financial benefits would the business see? I tried to explain the increase in wrench time, but he explained that the labour was a fixed cost. I explained how a high PM Compliance would increase uptime, but he wouldn’t believe it without data. Exactly what I wanted the CMMS for. My attempts were futile.

Over the years I have had the opportunity to further refine how I am able to link the improvements in Maintenance with Financial benefits for the business. Listed below are some of the quickest and easiest way to demonstrate the financial benefits often found in Maintenance Planning & Scheduling.

  1. Wrench Time Calculations

By calculating the improvements in wrench time, you are able to quickly and easily calculate a few financial improvements, such as reduction in Overtime, or the increase in efficiency of the maintenance department. So how is the improvements in wrench time calculated? By taking the baseline and comparing it to the improvement or estimated improvements. Once the difference has been determined, the return on the improvements can be calculated. For example, a small maintenance department with 10 craft people had a baseline of 30% wrench time. After maintenance planning & scheduling was introduced, the wrench time increased to 45%. Using these two numbers (45%/30%) you can see an increase of 150%.   So what does this mean to the business? Quite a few things can be determined;

  • Reduced Overtime

Reduction in overtime can be determined by trending the overtime numbers, or through the identification of improvements in the efficiency of the department. Using the example above, consider that each of the 10 craft people had an average hourly burden rate of $45 and work on average 2080 hours per year.   At 30% wrench time, the craft was only providing value added work for 6240 (10 x 2080 x 0.30) hours out of a possible 20800 (10 2080). With an increase in wrench time to 45%, the craft provided value for 9360 (10 x 2080 x 0.45) hours.

If the department was running an average of 15% overtime, that would work out to 3120 hours per year (20800 x 15%).   The increase of wrench time was able to ensure that the craft were able to provide an additional 3120 (9360-6240) of value added work, which cancels out all overtime. This would save the business approximately $210,000 per year in overtime wages.

  • Increase in Efficiency

The increase in efficiency calculation can be used to demonstrate that the department was able to increase the amount of work it can complete, without adding any head count. This can be measured by determining the number of full time equivalents (FTE) that the improvements created, or by calculating the number of hours that the craft team is now providing value added work. Using the example above, the department of 10 people increased efficiency by 150%. Based on the hours saved (3120), the department is was able to achieve an increase of 1.5 (3120 /2080) FTE in the department, resulting in a savings of $140,400 (1.5 FTE x 2080 hours x $45). This savings can be realized year over year.

 

  1. PM Compliance = Increased Uptime

When calculating improvements in uptime or OEE it is a bit more difficult, as there are so many factors that can influence OEE / Uptime. It is best to trend the improvements in PM Compliance from the start of the Maintenance Planning & Scheduling program, and continue to do so on an ongoing basis. Once the PM Compliance baseline has been established, compare it to the OEE or Uptime trends.   Now plot the trend together over time and see how much the improvements in PM compliance has impacted the OEE / Uptime. Excel has a great function (Correl) to determine if the increase in PM Compliance does in fact improve Uptime. Once this has been determined, you need to determine what each percent of PM Compliance is equal to in OEE or Uptime. This may require some detailed data analysis to determine. With the relationship determined, the savings to the business can be quantified. Typically each business knows what a percent of OEE or Uptime for a particular process or the site is worth in terms of lost opportunity costs. Using this number you would be able to determine the savings of benefits to the business. For example, a plant was able to determine that for each 5% increase in PM Compliance, OEE was improved by 1%. The lost opportunity cost for 1% OEE is $400 per hour. If the plant operates on a 24/7 basis, with a single two week shutdown, than a 1% increase in OEE would generate an additional revenue of $3,369,600 (24 hours x 351 days x $400).

In an instance where the PM Compliance rate is shown to decrease OEE or Uptime, than a Root Cause Analysis needs to be performed to determine why the PM Routines are not effective. This is where Fast Track RCM or Review RCM can be utilized to drive plant performance with effective PMs

Using either of these measures will enable you to determine Return on Investments for your maintenance improvements ahead of time, or to confirm your ROI estimates were correct. By using these you will be able to demonstrate the savings to Finance and senior managers, which should in turn enable you to drive further improvements in your operation.

What measures do you use to calculate the financial returns on your maintenance improvements?

Remember, to find success, you must first solve the problem, then achieve the implementation of the solution, and finally sustain winning results.

I’m James Kovacevic
HP RELIABILITY
Solve, Achieve, Sustain

Pictures of MoneyBy: Pictures of Money

Filed Under: Articles, Maintenance and Reliability, on Maintenance Reliability Tagged With: Maintenance planning, Maintenance scheduling

About James Kovacevic

James is a trainer, speaker, and consultant that specializes in bringing profitability, productivity, availability, and sustainability to manufacturers around the globe.

Through his career, James has made it his personal mission to make industry a profitable place; where individuals and manufacturers possess the resources, knowledge, and courage to sustainably lower their operating costs.

« Experiences with Magnetic Drive Pumps
Introduction to the Essential Characteristics of an RCA Program »

Comments

  1. Braden Bills says

    December 13, 2017 at 9:28 AM

    I want to make sure that I get my home improved. It makes sense that I would want to plan for maintenance as well! That way I can ensure that my improvements stay working and functional.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Maintenance & Reliability series


by James Kovacevic

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Articles

  • Leadership Values in Maintenance and Operations
  • Today’s Gremlin – It’ll never work here
  • How a Mission Statement Drives Behavioral Change in Organizations
  • Gremlins today
  • The Power of Vision in Leadership and Organizational Success

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy