Reliability testing is expensive, time-consuming, and fraught with errors. Is it worth the effort? Is it necessary? Let's explore relegating testing to only a ‘when necessary’ status. Let's explore what you and your team can do instead.

Testing results arrive late in the development program, often too late to improve reliability. The development team requires reliability performance feedback much earlier to make design and process improvements effectively.

The dilemma is many organizations rely on prototype testing to create the first estimates of product reliability performance. You can and should do better.

Let's explore the alternatives to testing you may want to employ. Plus, let's ensure the little testing generates the necessary reliability information efficiently and effectively. Given the typical testing investment, reliability testing should provide significant value to the team.

In this webinar, we will discuss poor and best practices around reliability testing, plus a handful of viable alternatives to limit the need for reliability testing.

This Accendo Reliability webinar originally broadcast on 14 February 2017.

Is Reliability Testing Always Necessary?Fred Schenkelberg

share

• Social:
• Link:
• Embed:

Download RSS

To view the recorded webinar and slides, visit the webinar page.

Related Content

Results-Driven Decisions, Faster: Accelerated Stress Testing as a Reliability Life Test episode
Introduction to HALT Highly Accelerated Life Testing with Dr. Christopher Jackson episode
Wishful Accelerated Testing episode
Issues with Single Stress Testing episode
Use FMEA to Design for In-Process Testing episode