
Best Practices When Dealing with Field Failures
Abstract
Kirk and Fred discussing the value of getting field failures returned for failure analysis and best practices in determining the causes.
ᐅ Play Episode
Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

Kirk and Fred discussing the value of getting field failures returned for failure analysis and best practices in determining the causes.
ᐅ Play Episode

Kirk and Fred discussing the relationship between quality and reliability. Quality can lead to a functional failure but sometimes is cosmetic or feel of a product.
ᐅ Play Episode
by James Kovacevic Leave a Comment

As a reliability engineer, you have to come in contact with failures that repeat over and over again. Sometimes you can’t find the best solution to solve a problem because there are other people involved in the issue as well. It might be due to the lack of communication because reliability engineers are not always good at people skills. There are various other fields that a reliability engineer might not be good at. So, there are many reasons a solution can’t be implemented right or doesn’t get you the desired results. That’s why Peter Horsburgh has written a book titled as “5 Habits of an Extraordinary Reliability Engineer.”
ᐅ Play Episode
by Robert Kalwarowsky Leave a Comment

On this week’s episode, I welcome back Lucas Marino, branch chief for the US Coast Guard and founder of Marino consulting back on to the show. We talk about leadership styles, communication and why trust is so important in leadership.
Follow Rob’s Reliability Project on LinkedIn –www.linkedin.com/company/robsreliabilityproject/
Follow Rob’s Reliability Project on Facebook –www.facebook.com/robsreliabilityproject/
Follow Lucas Marino on LinkedIn –www.linkedin.com/in/lucas-marino-pmp/
Follow Rob Kalwarowsky on LinkedIn –www.linkedin.com/in/robert-kalwarowsky-p-eng-03a43552
If you have any questions, business inquiries or if you’d like to appear on the podcast, email me atrobsreliabilityproject@gmail.com.
by Carl S. Carlson Leave a Comment

Carl and Fred discussing the three most important principles that summarize the reliability philosophy of successful companies, focusing on the third principle.
ᐅ Play Episode
by Fred Schenkelberg Leave a Comment

Testing is expensive. Reliability testing is often complex. Let’s break down the basics of planning and conducting reliability testing that provides meaningful results cost-effectively and timely. Let’s do testing right.
[Read more…]

Carl and Fred discussing the three most important principles that summarize the reliability philosophy of successful companies, with focus on the second principle.
ᐅ Play Episode
by James Kovacevic Leave a Comment

The companies who have an asset management program can’t be successful without implementing RCM in their facilities. They will face failures all the time and if they don’t have any proactive process like RCM in place, they are never going to come out of fixing things again and again. So, what is RCM? RCM is one of the most efficient and effective proactive maintenance processes that is considered one of the most powerful asset management tools. One of the coolest things about RCM is that you can apply it to any industry or your daily life. It has one of the most diverse applications in the world.
ᐅ Play Episode
by Robert Kalwarowsky Leave a Comment

This week’s episode is sponsored by Fluke and I welcome back John Bernet to the show. We talk about why we need to start off with criticality or RCM to determine our maintenance strategies, mistakes people make when starting a vibration analysis program and we dive deeper into vibration analysis.
If you want to learn more about Fluke’s products or about John Bernet, go to accendoreliability.com/go/fluke
Follow Rob Kalwarowsky on LinkedIn –www.linkedin.com/in/robert-kalwarowsky-p-eng-03a43552
If you have any questions, business inquiries or if you’d like to appear on the podcast, email me atrobsreliabilityproject@gmail.com.
by Carl S. Carlson Leave a Comment

Carl and Fred discussing the question: Is it more important to calculate reliability or to achieve reliability?
ᐅ Play Episode
by Christopher Jackson Leave a Comment

Chris and Fred discussing how different organizations deal with failures. Failures are a ‘bad’ thing in that a system doesn’t do what you hoped it would. But what about failures that occur during the design or production process? This is different. If you have scope to improve your system, then failures that you can analyze in a laboratory or test bed are invaluable. They, more than any other event, will help you understand the vulnerabilities of your system. And you must actively seek vulnerability to improve reliability. But if you are looking for failures, you must first admit that your system is vulnerable. And that is difficult for many people to do.
ᐅ Play Episode
by James Kovacevic Leave a Comment

The link between reliability and safety cannot be overstated, especially since injuries to the technicians and engineers are very common mostly in manufacturing industries. These workplace injuries can have a severe impact on the organizational resources. Notwithstanding, there are still organizations that are not sold to the idea of creating a reliable plant. These organizations consider reliability as just a way to maintain the machines. What they fail to understand is that safety can only be achieved through reliability.
ᐅ Play Episode
by Robert Kalwarowsky Leave a Comment

In this week’s episode, I speak with Michelle Ledet Henley about her SMRP conference talk, “Ball Caps and Barbecues? What Really Motivates.” We talk about internal versus external motivation and how to properly engage your people in a reliability initiative.
Check out The Manufacturing Game –manufacturinggame.com/
Follow Michelle Ledet Henley on LinkedIn –www.linkedin.com/in/michelle-ledet-henley-9376a67/
Follow Rob Kalwarowsky on LinkedIn –www.linkedin.com/in/robert-kalwarowsky-p-eng-03a43552
If you have any questions, business inquiries or if you’d like to appear on the podcast, email me atrobsreliabilityproject@gmail.com
by Christopher Jackson Leave a Comment

Chris and Fred discussing the recent Russian Soyuz rocket failure. With the retirement of NASA’s space shuttle fleet, the Soyuz rocket and spacecraft are now the only viable way to launch humans into space. The 1960s Soyuz rocket propels the 1960s Soyuz spacecraft into orbit … and to be clear it is only the rocket that failed. The Soyuz spacecraft successfully aborted the launch keep the crew safe. The Soyuz rocket has long been the yardstick of rocket safety – it easily has the most impressive reliability track record. But should this recent failure change that perception? And how can the Soyuz system still be operating when other programs have come and gone, primarily due to safety and reliability? This podcast attempts to answer some of these questions.
ᐅ Play Episode

Kirk and Fred discussing the difficulty of keeping the failure data and details of past failures of products in order to make more reliable products.
ᐅ Play Episode
Ask a question or send along a comment.
Please login to view and use the contact form.