Accendo Reliability https://fred-schenkelberg-project.prev01.rmkr.net Wed, 27 Mar 2024 21:42:29 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.6.2 © 2025 FMS Reliability Illuminated Reliability Engineering Knowledge Accendo Reliability Illuminated Reliability Engineering Knowledge Accendo Reliability fms@fmsreliability.com No The MTBF and Modeling System Reliability https://fred-schenkelberg-project.prev01.rmkr.net/podcast/arw/the-mtbf-and-modeling-system-reliability/ https://fred-schenkelberg-project.prev01.rmkr.net/podcast/arw/the-mtbf-and-modeling-system-reliability/#comments Tue, 26 Mar 2024 18:42:37 +0000 https://accendoreliability.com/?post_type=podcast&p=541860 The MTBF and Modeling System Reliability

podcast episode with speaker Chris Jackson

The Mean Time Between Failure (MTBF) appears in lots of textbooks and standards, so it must be really important right? Well, not really. The MTBF is the most overused and misunderstood term in reliability engineering, including system reliability modeling, where we can find textbooks and standards with equations that allow you to calculate system MTBF from component MTBFs. If you are unsure why the MTBF is bad, especially for system reliability modeling, then join us for this webinar, where we will illustrate with pictures (not equations) what the MTBF is and how bad it can be to focus on it as a reliability performance metric.

This Accendo Reliability webinar was originally broadcast on 26 March 2024.

The MTBF and Modeling System ReliabilityChristopher Jackson
  • Social:
  • Link:
  • Embed:

To view the recorded video/audio and PDF workbook of the event, visit the webinar page.

Additional content that may be of interest

Only Have MTBFs episode

How Do I Do MTBF Testing episode

What’s Wrong with MTBF episode

How to Talk About MTBF episode

]]>
https://fred-schenkelberg-project.prev01.rmkr.net/podcast/arw/the-mtbf-and-modeling-system-reliability/feed/ 2 The Mean Time Between Failure (MTBF) appears in lots of textbooks and standards, so it must be really important ... right? Well, not really. No No 0:00 Christopher Jackson