Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
    • About Us
    • Colophon
    • Survey
  • Reliability.fm
    • Speaking Of Reliability
    • Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
    • Quality during Design
    • CMMSradio
    • Way of the Quality Warrior
    • Critical Talks
    • Asset Performance
    • Dare to Know
    • Maintenance Disrupted
    • Metal Conversations
    • The Leadership Connection
    • Practical Reliability Podcast
    • Reliability Hero
    • Reliability Matters
    • Reliability it Matters
    • Maintenance Mavericks Podcast
    • Women in Maintenance
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • NoMTBF
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • ASQR&R
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Maintenance Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • RCM Blitz®
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Breaking Bad for Reliability
      • Field Reliability Data Analysis
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability by Design
      • Reliability Competence
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
      • Reliability Knowledge
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • The RCA
      • Communicating with FINESSE
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Institute of Quality & Reliability
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Statistical Methods for Failure-Time Data
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Hardware Product Develoment Lifecycle
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Special Offers
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Glossary
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinar Sources
    • Journals
    • Higher Education
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • Your Courses
    • 14 Ways to Acquire Reliability Engineering Knowledge
    • Live Courses
      • Introduction to Reliability Engineering & Accelerated Testings Course Landing Page
      • Advanced Accelerated Testing Course Landing Page
    • Integral Concepts Courses
      • Reliability Analysis Methods Course Landing Page
      • Applied Reliability Analysis Course Landing Page
      • Statistics, Hypothesis Testing, & Regression Modeling Course Landing Page
      • Measurement System Assessment Course Landing Page
      • SPC & Process Capability Course Landing Page
      • Design of Experiments Course Landing Page
    • The Manufacturing Academy Courses
      • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Statistics
      • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
      • Quality Engineering Statistics
      • FMEA in Practice
      • Process Capability Analysis course
      • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
      • Return on Investment online course
    • Industrial Metallurgist Courses
    • FMEA courses Powered by The Luminous Group
      • FMEA Introduction
      • AIAG & VDA FMEA Methodology
    • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction
      • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction Course Landing Page
    • Fault Tree Analysis (FTA)
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • How to be an Online Student
    • Quondam Courses
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Live Events
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home
Home » LMS » Page 15

by Steven Wachs Leave a Comment

Proportion Nonconforming

Proportion Nonconforming

Section 4 Process Capability

Lesson S04-02

Text: Section 4 pages 9 – 16

Duration: 27 minutes

 

Calculating the Proportion Nonconforming

Next, we explain a method for determining the proportion of nonconforming parts when the distribution of individuals is Normal. The procedure requires the use of the Standard Normal table (to avoid dealing with Calculus!) We will review the Standard Normal distribution and the table describing it.

The Standard Normal Distribution

The Standard Normal (or “Z” distribution as it is sometimes referred to) has the notable feature that the mean is zero and the standard deviation is 1. Thus, the Z scale is an indicator of the distance from average in number of standard deviations.

https://s3.amazonaws.com/courses-accendoreliability-com/spc-process-capability/s04-02/spc-pc-s04-02a.mp4

The 7-up Example

https://s3.amazonaws.com/courses-accendoreliability-com/spc-process-capability/s04-02/spc-pc-s04-02b.mp4

The Z Table used in this example is in the text in Section 4 page 14.

The Fuel Injector Example

https://s3.amazonaws.com/courses-accendoreliability-com/spc-process-capability/s04-02/spc-pc-s04-02c.mp4

How to Determine Probability with Excel

https://s3.amazonaws.com/courses-accendoreliability-com/spc-process-capability/s04-02/spc-pc-s04-02d.mp4

How to Determine Probability with Minitab

https://s3.amazonaws.com/courses-accendoreliability-com/spc-process-capability/s04-02/spc-pc-s04-02e.mp4

 

View Previous View Next

by Steven Wachs Leave a Comment

Introduction to Process Capability

Introduction to Process Capability

Section 4 Process Capability

Lesson S04-01

Text: Section 4 pages 1 – 8

Duration: 9 minutes

 

Introduction to Process Capability

 

https://s3.amazonaws.com/courses-accendoreliability-com/spc-process-capability/s04-01/spc-pc-s04-01a.mp4

Introduction to Process Capability Assessment

Process Capability Assessment addresses how well a process will perform relative to specifications. Highly capable processes have small variation and possess minimal risk of producing nonconforming products.

Several approaches exist to measure process capability. This course will focus on a few of the most common methods.

https://s3.amazonaws.com/courses-accendoreliability-com/spc-process-capability/s04-01/spc-pc-s04-01b.mp4

Is This Process Stable?

https://s3.amazonaws.com/courses-accendoreliability-com/spc-process-capability/s04-01/spc-pc-s04-01c.mp4

 

 

Given the X̄ chart shown above, is the process capable?

View the next video for answers/discussion.

Is the Process Capable?

https://s3.amazonaws.com/courses-accendoreliability-com/spc-process-capability/s04-01/spc-pc-s04-01d.mp4

 

 

Given the X̄ chart shown above, why can we not conclude the process is capable?

View the next video for answers/discussion.

Drawing a Conclusion

https://s3.amazonaws.com/courses-accendoreliability-com/spc-process-capability/s04-01/spc-pc-s04-01e.mp4

Stability and Capability Concepts Review

More frequently than not, stability and capability are confused with each other. In addition, some think that stability implies capability and vice versa. This is not true. Here, we again demonstrate that stability and capability are independent notions, and there is no relation between the two.

https://s3.amazonaws.com/courses-accendoreliability-com/spc-process-capability/s04-01/spc-pc-s04-01f.mp4

View Next

by Fred Schenkelberg 1 Comment

Product Reliability Webinars

  • Estimating Value

    The purpose of this webinar is to explore how to calculate the value of reliability engineering activities.
    View Webinar
View Next

by Fred Schenkelberg Leave a Comment

Estimating Value

Estimating the Value of Reliability Activities

Determine the worth of your work

View the 2.5-hour recorded webinar

Speaker: Fred Schenkelberg

Thanks a lot for the discussion. I am going to start building some cases based on historical data with some assumptions. I liked your stories and some objection answers you provided. Thanks a lot for the recording. — Thomas Cimprich, Reliability Manager

[show_to accesslevel=”pwrf001″]
The event went for 2 .5 hours and has four sections of content/discussion, so I broke down the recordings into those four sections.

The first is an introduction and addresses the question of What is Value?

The second section explores the many potential sources of value.

The third section is a detailed example and discussion.

the fourth and last section explores the many objections you may experience concerning your reliability program and some tips on overcoming those objections.

And the checklist handout

Reliability Value Worksheet

If you have comments or questions, leave a note below or contact me directly, cheers, Fred
[/show_to]

[hide_from accesslevel=”pwrf001″]

Cost: $100

An Accendo Reliability 2-hour webinar event focused on providing you practical content to improve your reliability program today.

Event Registration $100 for this 2-hour event

[/hide_from]

Abstract:

An obvious result of good reliability engineering is the lack of field failures. Connecting your work to the results is not always obvious. In today’s lean organizations’ everyone has to provide tangible value. Yet, if the product is doing well, how do you show your ongoing contribution to the organization? Reliability engineering may increase the cost of a product or lead to expensive product testing.

Justifying these expenses is often based on the chance of improved product reliability. It is the quantification of value resulting from specific reliability engineering actions that enable you to articulate your worth to an organization.

The purpose of this webinar is to explore how to calculate the value of reliability engineering activities. We will explore ways to estimate value for use in engineering proposals. We know that a reliable product provides value to the customer, but it also is a value to you and your organization. Here you will learn how to connect specific reliability engineering work to the real value created.
[hide_from accesslevel=”pwrf001″]

 

[/hide_from]

by Steven Wachs Leave a Comment

Trending Charts

Trending Charts

Section 8

Many types of production processes are not well supported by the traditional charting techniques that were first invented in the 1920’s. This topic covers several additional control charting methods that have numerous applications in modern production systems.

Sections 5 through 9 include details on:

  • 5. Charts for Short Production Runs (Short Run Charts)
  • 6. Charts for Multiple Locations (Within/Between Charts)
  • 7. CUSUM Charts
  • 8. Trending Charts
  • 9. Charts for Attribute Data (Appendix in text)

 

 

View Previous View Next

by Steven Wachs Leave a Comment

CUSUM Charts

CUSUM Charts

Section 7

Many types of production processes are not well supported by the traditional charting techniques that were first invented in the 1920’s. This topic covers several additional control charting methods that have numerous applications in modern production systems.

Sections 5 through 9 include details on:

  • 5. Charts for Short Production Runs (Short Run Charts)
  • 6. Charts for Multiple Locations (Within/Between Charts)
  • 7. CUSUM Charts
  • 8. Trending Charts
  • 9. Charts for Attribute Data (Appendix in text)

 

 

View Previous View Next

by Steven Wachs Leave a Comment

Charts for Multiple Locations

Charts for Multiple Locations

Section 6

Many types of production processes are not well supported by the traditional charting techniques that were first invented in the 1920’s. This topic covers several additional control charting methods that have numerous applications in modern production systems.

Sections 5 through 9 include details on:

  • 5. Charts for Short Production Runs (Short Run Charts)
  • 6. Charts for Multiple Locations (Within/Between Charts)
  • 7. CUSUM Charts
  • 8. Trending Charts
  • 9. Charts for Attribute Data (Appendix in text)

 

 

View Previous View Next

by Steven Wachs Leave a Comment

Course Introduction

Course Introduction

Section 1

Welcome to the Statistical Process Control & Process Capability course!

In this section, you will find information about:

  • An introduction to the course along with the purpose, goals, and business drivers involved as you implement SPC and process capability studies.
  • A brief course overview
  • A link to download the course supporting textbook
  • Recommendations to get the most from the course
  • An introduction to the mechanics of this online course

 

Click on the module 1 menu item (in the right sidebar on larger screens or below the content on smaller screens) to view the individual lessons within this section of the course. Note the menu will not work if you are not registered for the course and if you are not logged in to the site.

 

View Next

by Steven Wachs Leave a Comment

Short Run Charts

Short Run Charts

Section 5

Many types of production processes are not well supported by the traditional charting techniques that were first invented in the 1920’s. This topic covers several additional control charting methods that have numerous applications in modern production systems.

Sections 5 through 9 include details on:

  • 5. Charts for Short Production Runs (Short Run Charts)
  • 6. Charts for Multiple Locations (Within/Between Charts)
  • 7. CUSUM Charts
  • 8. Trending Charts
  • 9. Charts for Attribute Data (Appendix in text)

 

 

View Previous View Next

by Steven Wachs Leave a Comment

Process Capability

Process Capability

Section 4

Process capability assessment is performed to assess how well a product characteristic will meet customer or engineering specifications. Highly capable processes are required in order to provide a consistent and reliable performance for our customers.

This section focuses on the methods used to assess process capability for key characteristics.

This section includes details on:

  • Types of capability assessments
  • Review of stability vs. capability
  • Estimating ppm (parts per million defective)
  • Defining and estimating capability indices (e.g. Cpk)
  • Interpretation and limitations of capability indices
  • Handling nonnormal data

 

 

View Previous View Next

by Steven Wachs Leave a Comment

Control Charts Wrap-up

Control Charts Wrap-up

Section 3 Control Charts

Lesson S03-14

Text: Section 3 pages 76 – 80

Duration: 6 minutes

 

Control Chart Selection

A large variety of charts are available for use and the proper chart selection depends on several factors. These include:

  • Data Type (Variable or Attribute)
  • Sensitivity Required
  • Ability to Obtain Rational Samples
  • Production Volumes and Cycle Times
  • Constancy of Sample Size
https://s3.amazonaws.com/courses-accendoreliability-com/spc-process-capability/s03-14/spc-pc-s03-14a.mp4

Control Plan Updates

As Statistical Process Control charts are implemented, the Control Plan should be updated to reflect the following information:

  • Type of control chart(s)
  • Sample size
  • Sampling frequency
https://s3.amazonaws.com/courses-accendoreliability-com/spc-process-capability/s03-14/spc-pc-s03-14b.mp4

Control Charts Summary

https://s3.amazonaws.com/courses-accendoreliability-com/spc-process-capability/s03-14/spc-pc-s03-14c.mp4

 

 

View Previous

by Steven Wachs Leave a Comment

Exercise 6

Exercise 6

Section 3 Control Charts

Lesson S03-13

Text: Section 3 page 75 and Section 9 pages 11 – 12

Duration: 10 minutes

 

Introduction to Exercise 6

https://s3.amazonaws.com/courses-accendoreliability-com/spc-process-capability/s03-13/spc-pc-s03-13a.mp4

a. It is wise to ignore the first chart signal and wait for another to be sure the process is out-of-control before reacting (true/false).

Solution/Discussion: Exercise 6 a

https://s3.amazonaws.com/courses-accendoreliability-com/spc-process-capability/s03-13/spc-pc-s03-13b.mp4

b. When should control limits be recomputed?

Solution/Discussion: Exercise 6 b

https://s3.amazonaws.com/courses-accendoreliability-com/spc-process-capability/s03-13/spc-pc-s03-13c.mp4

c. Provide an example (from your operation, if possible) where obtaining a rational sample may be problematic.

Solution/Discussion: Exercise 6 c

https://s3.amazonaws.com/courses-accendoreliability-com/spc-process-capability/s03-13/spc-pc-s03-13d.mp4

d. How does the subgroups size affect the sensitivity (ability to detect process changes) of an X̄ chart?

Solution/Discussion: Exercise 6 d

https://s3.amazonaws.com/courses-accendoreliability-com/spc-process-capability/s03-13/spc-pc-s03-13e.mp4

e. A beer bottler labels the product as a 12 fluid oz container. The filling process standard deviation (for volume) is 0.12 fluid oz. The fill volumes follow a normal distribution and the bottler decides to center the process at 12.36 to protect from “underfills.”

What is the sample size required to detect a shift of 0.18 fl oz with 80% probability (type II error is 0.20)?

Hint: Use MINITAB or the Excel worksheet Control Chart Sample Size.XLS

Solution/Discussion: Exercise 6 e

https://s3.amazonaws.com/courses-accendoreliability-com/spc-process-capability/s03-13/spc-pc-s03-13f.mp4

f. This is a continuation of the previous problem. Following a variation reduction effort, the standard deviation for the fill volume has been reduced from 0.12 to 0.08 fl oz.

What is the sample size required now to detect a shift of 0.18 fl oz with 80% probability (type II error is 0.20)?

Solution/Discussion: Exercise 6 f

https://s3.amazonaws.com/courses-accendoreliability-com/spc-process-capability/s03-13/spc-pc-s03-13g.mp4

 

 

View Previous View Next

by Steven Wachs Leave a Comment

Calculating Sample Sizes

Calculating Sample Sizes

Section 3 Control Charts

Lesson S03-12

Text: Section 3 pages 73 – 75

Duration: 19 minutes

 

Sample Size Guidance

The sample size for an X̄ control chart is a function of:

  • The process standard deviation
  • The size of the shift we want to detect
  • The allowable level of Type II Error (probability that the specified shift is not detected when the shift occurs)

We have already seen that the smaller the size of the shift that we want to detect, the larger the sample size we need. Also, reducing Type II error requires a larger sample size. Finally, the larger our standard deviation is, the larger the sample size that is needed to detect a specified process change.

https://s3.amazonaws.com/courses-accendoreliability-com/spc-process-capability/s03-12/spc-pc-s03-12a.mp4

The Sample Size Worksheet

An Excel file called “Control Chart Sample Size” (download with the link) and it allows sample sizes to be calculated for X̄ charts in order to detect a specified mean shift with a specified power. This worksheet allows the user to specify:

  • Process Standard Deviation
  • Amount of Shift to be Detected
  • Power (Probability of Detection)
https://s3.amazonaws.com/courses-accendoreliability-com/spc-process-capability/s03-12/spc-pc-s03-12b.mp4

Download the Excel worksheet here: control-chart-sample-size.xls

Sample Size Calculations in Minitab

https://s3.amazonaws.com/courses-accendoreliability-com/spc-process-capability/s03-12/spc-pc-s03-12c.mp4

Sampling Frequency

For ongoing process monitoring, the sampling frequency is a function of the: – Risk of Undetected Process Changes

  • Current Process Capability
  • Type II Error Probability (probability that a process change is NOT detected on a given sample)
  • Cost of Sampling
https://s3.amazonaws.com/courses-accendoreliability-com/spc-process-capability/s03-12/spc-pc-s03-12d.mp4

 

 

View Previous View Next

by Steven Wachs Leave a Comment

Sample Size

Sample Size

Section 3 Control Charts

Lesson S03-11

Text: Section 3 pages 64 – 72

Duration: 24 minutes

 

Sample Size Sensitivity

Our discussion now moves to the issue of sample size, although the term “sensitivity” is sometimes used. It will become evident why sample size controls the sensitivity of control charts. By sensitivity, we mean the ability of a control chart to detect change.

Control charts are supposed to detect change when change occurs. The question is, “what kind of change do charts detect?” Are all X̄ charts equivalent in their ability to detect changes?

https://s3.amazonaws.com/courses-accendoreliability-com/spc-process-capability/s03-11/spc-pc-s03-11a.mp4

Example: Ice Cream Filling Process

https://s3.amazonaws.com/courses-accendoreliability-com/spc-process-capability/s03-11/spc-pc-s03-11b.mp4

Sample Size Summary

https://s3.amazonaws.com/courses-accendoreliability-com/spc-process-capability/s03-11/spc-pc-s03-11c.mp4

 

 

View Previous View Next

by Steven Wachs Leave a Comment

Sampling Considerations

Sampling Considerations

Section 3 Control Charts

Lesson S03-10

Text: Section 3 pages 55 – 63

Duration: 15 minutes

 

Types of Samples

There are a multitude of statistical sampling types, but in this section, only three will be described. Of the three, only one is fundamental to the traditional control charting methods presented in this course. Let’s discuss a Random Sample, a Systematic Sample, and a Rational Sample.

https://s3.amazonaws.com/courses-accendoreliability-com/spc-process-capability/s03-10/spc-pc-s03-10a.mp4

Example: A Choice Between Two Plans

https://s3.amazonaws.com/courses-accendoreliability-com/spc-process-capability/s03-10/spc-pc-s03-10b.mp4

Option 1: Suppose you are given a choice of two sampling plans. Both plans allow you to select a sample of size 10 every two hours or thereabouts. The first strategy is a systematic plan advising you to measure one part approximately every 12 minutes. Here, you do not let the process operate too long without monitoring it.

Option 2: The second strategy is a rational sampling method advising you to measure 5 consecutively produced parts and then let the process operate for an hour or so (without looking at it), and then to select another 5 consecutively produced parts.

Which sampling plan would you choose?

The next video discusses the selection considerations.

Rational Samples

Discussion on the sample plan selection and the various considerations.

https://s3.amazonaws.com/courses-accendoreliability-com/spc-process-capability/s03-10/spc-pc-s03-10c.mp4

Violations of Rational Sampling

Examples include:

  • Sampling from multiple locations on the same unit
  • Multi-Cavity Molding Operations
  • Machining Operations where multiple units are machined together
  • Continuous Flow processing
https://s3.amazonaws.com/courses-accendoreliability-com/spc-process-capability/s03-10/spc-pc-s03-10d.mp4

Subgroups vs. Individuals

A common question is, “Why plot subgroup averages rather than individual values?” As we have seen earlier, individual measurements often do NOT follow a normal distribution. Therefore, determining appropriate control limits requires methods for nonnormal data. Averages follow a normal distribution due to the Central Limit Theorem so plotting averages is convenient.

https://s3.amazonaws.com/courses-accendoreliability-com/spc-process-capability/s03-10/spc-pc-s03-10e.mp4

 

View Previous View Next
  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • …
  • 43
  • Next Page »
[hide_from site_member="1" visible_to="public"] Get Weekly Email Updates
[/hide_from]
The Accendo Reliablity logo of a sun face in circuit

[hide_from visible_to='public']Please login to have full access.

[login-form]
[password-recovery-link text='Lost Password? Click here to have it emailed to you.']

Not already a member? It's free and takes only a moment to create an account with your email only.

Join

Your membership brings you all these free resources:

  • Live, monthly reliability webinars & recordings
  • eBooks: Finding Value and Reliability Maturity
  • How To articles & insights
  • Podcasts & additional information within podcast show notes
  • Podcast suggestion box to send us a question or topic for a future episode
  • Course (some with a fee)
  • Largest reliability events calendar
  • Course on a range of topics - coming soon
  • Master reliability classes - coming soon
  • Basic tutorial articles - coming soon
  • With more in the works just for members

[/hide_from][show_to accesslevel="Free" ]
Thanks for being a member [member_first_name]!
[/show_to]

© 2026 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy

Book the Course with John
  Ask a question or send along a comment. Please login to view and use the contact form.
This site uses cookies to give you a better experience, analyze site traffic, and gain insight to products or offers that may interest you. By continuing, you consent to the use of cookies. Learn how we use cookies, how they work, and how to set your browser preferences by reading our Cookies Policy.