Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
    • About Us
    • Colophon
    • Survey
  • Reliability.fm
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • NoMTBF
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • ASQR&R
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Maintenance Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • RCM Blitz®
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Field Reliability Data Analysis
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability by Design
      • Reliability Competence
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
      • Reliability Knowledge
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Institute of Quality & Reliability
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Statistical Methods for Failure-Time Data
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Glossary
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinar Sources
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • Your Courses
    • Live Courses
      • Introduction to Reliability Engineering & Accelerated Testings Course Landing Page
      • Advanced Accelerated Testing Course Landing Page
    • Integral Concepts Courses
      • Reliability Analysis Methods Course Landing Page
      • Applied Reliability Analysis Course Landing Page
      • Statistics, Hypothesis Testing, & Regression Modeling Course Landing Page
      • Measurement System Assessment Course Landing Page
      • SPC & Process Capability Course Landing Page
      • Design of Experiments Course Landing Page
    • The Manufacturing Academy Courses
      • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Statistics
      • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
      • Quality Engineering Statistics
      • FMEA in Practice
      • Process Capability Analysis course
      • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
      • Return on Investment online course
    • Industrial Metallurgist Courses
    • FMEA courses Powered by The Luminous Group
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • How to be an Online Student
    • Quondam Courses
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home
  • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction Course Landing Page
  • Upcoming Live Events
You are here: Home / Articles / Building and Using a System Reliability Model

by Fred Schenkelberg 4 Comments

Building and Using a System Reliability Model

Building and Using a System Reliability Model

From the simplest to the most complex system, building and using a reliability model permits the entire team to make better decisions.

Understanding and monitoring system reliability involves knowing both:

  1. the reliability of elements within the system,
  2. as well as how the elements relate to each other reliability-wise.

We use system reliability models to identify weak links, and focus resources, to meet our desired reliability goals.

Being able to build the right model to meet your team’s needs best is one of your roles as a reliability professional.

Reliability Block Diagrams (RBD)

Often depicting elements within a system as a block within a diagram, RBD models provide a graphical and mathematical model of the system’s reliability, given the reliability and relationships of the elements within the system.

The diagram may not reflect the functional diagram of a system as it focuses on the reliability relationships between components or subsystems. For example, within a series system, the RBD will show a string of blocks such that anyone block failing results in the system failing.

It looks like a chain, hence the common analogy of “weakest link.”

Another example has two elements in parallel, such that if one fails, the other keeps the system operating. Parallel structures can get complicated. There are:

Standby Redundancy with Equal Failure Rates and Perfect Switching
Standby Redundancy, Equal Failure Rates, Imperfect Switching

Of course, there are unequal failure rate situations, as well as many other situations.

Parallel structures may also include more than two elements. The k out of n structure means the system continues to operate if k of the n parallel elements remains functional, thus permitting n – k elements to fail without system failure.

Fault Tree Analysis (FTA)

A fault tree analysis (FTA) is a logical, graphical diagram that starts with an unwanted, undesirable, or anomalous state of a system.

The diagram then lays out the many possible faults and combinations of faults within the subsystems, components, assemblies, software, and parts comprising the system, which may lead to the top-level unwanted fault condition.

The key to these models being effective is to select the important top-level failures or faults to model. For systems with more than a few top-level faults of concern, then RBD may be a better starting point.

FTA models use a set of symbols to relate system elements, events, etc. The creation of a useful FTA is not difficult, yet may take some time to fully depict all the paths that may lead to failure.

FTA provides the design team a way to organize the relationships between elements and events that may lead (or prevent or mitigate) failures.

FTA is a useful tool for your reliability program.

Success Tree Analysis (STA)

Very similar to an FTA except the top event is a success state rather than a failure/fault state.

Instead of focusing on how the system can fail the model focuses on how the elements of a system relate, including events, such that the system functions as expected.

Markov models

Let’s assume that the future reliability performance of a system relies on the current state of the system, not on its history. This memoryless property is called a Markovian property.

Markov models work well with complex repairable systems when we’re interested in long-term average reliability and availability values.

A nice description of Markov Models is by Kevin Brown with an early version of the book “Markov Models and Reliability.”

One of the notable strengths of Markov models for reliability analysis is that they can account for repairs and failures. This makes the technique particularly useful for assessing the long-term average reliability of one or more devices with established maintenance and repair strategies.

Petri net models

A Petri net graph is a depiction of a system using symbolic language. The modeling permits the analysis of complex systems or networks of systems.

It is possible to include elements of the system that are neither functional nor failed. In other words, it permits modeling a system when one or more elements are in a degraded state or under repair.

Petri net modeling is useful when the repair/restore times are long compared to operating times, as reliability block diagrams and fault tree analysis approaches assume short or insignificant repair times in most cases.

Failure mechanism models or Physics of Failure (PoF) models

Elements, specific components, may have one or more ways they can fail. Sometimes there are known and dominant failure mechanisms.

Modeling these mechanisms permits us to evaluate design or use changes, differences in use conditions, etc.

Models may be derived from empirical data for a specific failure mechanisms and use conditions. Or, it may be analytically derived and experimentally verified.

PoF models permit you to model specific failure mechanisms in detail. If you know your customers may use the product in different ways or environments, then the PoF model allows you to estimate failure rates or distributions for each customer group.

Summary

You have options when modeling your system concerning reliability.

Simple systems will do fine with basic RBD models supplemented by PoF models. Complex or very high system availability systems often require using Markov or Petri Net models and may require specialized resources to create and maintain the system reliability models.

The model is not useful unless it is useful for decision-making across the team. Creating a model should support the team’s ability to focus resources, make design decisions, and evaluate risks.

Which model do you typically use, and how well is it working for you? Please feel free to leave a comment below.

Filed Under: Articles, CRE Preparation Notes, Reliability Modeling and Predictions Tagged With: Physics of Failure (PoF), Reliability Block Diagram (RBD)

About Fred Schenkelberg

I am the reliability expert at FMS Reliability, a reliability engineering and management consulting firm I founded in 2004. I left Hewlett Packard (HP)’s Reliability Team, where I helped create a culture of reliability across the corporation, to assist other organizations.

« Annual Apex Ridge Seminar “Balancing Reliability with Product Development Goals”
Agitator Shafts Thrust Bearing »

Comments

  1. Sathish Rajendran says

    March 28, 2019 at 5:34 AM

    Hi Fred , Can i please get your contact number to talk to you directly? i have some clarifications on the Reliability Model building for Fall Protection products? i would appreciate if you could spare few minutes from your busy schedule

    Thanks and Regards,
    Sathish Rajendran

    Reply
    • Fred Schenkelberg says

      March 28, 2019 at 10:23 AM

      Sure, sent my contact information directly and in case you miss it, I’m at

      fms@fmsreliability.com and (408) 710-8248

      Let me know when to expect a call as I receive so many spam call I don’t answer unless I know the number or expect the call.

      Cheers,

      Fred

      Reply
  2. Catherine Chandioux says

    June 17, 2021 at 11:28 AM

    Hi Fred,

    Which software would you recommend in System reliability ?
    What is the best method/ software for forecasting warranty failures and costs ?
    Thank you and
    B.Regards
    Catherine C.

    Reply
    • Fred Schenkelberg says

      June 18, 2021 at 5:48 AM

      Hi Catherine,

      I recommend the software that you are familiar with and does a good job of both modeling and understanding the data.

      The best method is using field data and determining the pattern of failures for each salient failure mechanism. Then us a reliability block diagram to assembly the data into a system model.

      Second, using internally generated time to failure data supplemented with time to failure data from vendors

      Another consideration to supplement the data is physics of failure approaches.

      cheers,

      Fred
      PS: Never us parts-count or similar approaches

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

[popup type="" link_text="Get Weekly Email Updates" link_class="button" ][display_form id=266][/popup]

The Accendo Reliablity logo of a sun face in circuit

Please login to have full access.




Lost Password? Click here to have it emailed to you.

Not already a member? It's free and takes only a moment to create an account with your email only.

Join

Your membership brings you all these free resources:

  • Live, monthly reliability webinars & recordings
  • eBooks: Finding Value and Reliability Maturity
  • How To articles & insights
  • Podcasts & additional information within podcast show notes
  • Podcast suggestion box to send us a question or topic for a future episode
  • Course (some with a fee)
  • Largest reliability events calendar
  • Course on a range of topics - coming soon
  • Master reliability classes - coming soon
  • Basic tutorial articles - coming soon
  • With more in the works just for members
Speaking of Reliability podcast logo

Subscribe and enjoy every episode

RSS
iTunes
Stitcher

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about podcasts and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Dare to Know podcast logo

Subscribe and enjoy every episode

RSS
iTunes
Stitcher

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about podcasts and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Accendo Reliability Webinar Series podcast logo

Subscribe and enjoy every episode

RSS
iTunes
Stitcher

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about podcasts and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Articles

  • Gremlins today
  • The Power of Vision in Leadership and Organizational Success
  • 3 Types of MTBF Stories
  • ALT: An in Depth Description
  • Project Email Economics

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy