Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
    • About Us
    • Colophon
    • Survey
  • Reliability.fm
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • NoMTBF
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • ASQR&R
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Maintenance Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • RCM Blitz®
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Field Reliability Data Analysis
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability by Design
      • Reliability Competence
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
      • Reliability Knowledge
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Institute of Quality & Reliability
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Statistical Methods for Failure-Time Data
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Glossary
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinar Sources
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • Your Courses
    • Live Courses
      • Introduction to Reliability Engineering & Accelerated Testings Course Landing Page
      • Advanced Accelerated Testing Course Landing Page
    • Integral Concepts Courses
      • Reliability Analysis Methods Course Landing Page
      • Applied Reliability Analysis Course Landing Page
      • Statistics, Hypothesis Testing, & Regression Modeling Course Landing Page
      • Measurement System Assessment Course Landing Page
      • SPC & Process Capability Course Landing Page
      • Design of Experiments Course Landing Page
    • The Manufacturing Academy Courses
      • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Statistics
      • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
      • Quality Engineering Statistics
      • FMEA in Practice
      • Process Capability Analysis course
      • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
      • Return on Investment online course
    • Industrial Metallurgist Courses
    • FMEA courses Powered by The Luminous Group
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • How to be an Online Student
    • Quondam Courses
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home
  • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction Course Landing Page
  • Upcoming Live Events
You are here: Home / Articles / OSHA Chemical NEP

by Sanjeev Saraf Leave a Comment

OSHA Chemical NEP

OSHA Chemical NEP

On July 27, 2009 OSHA launched its National Emphasis Program (NEP) targeted at chemical facilities. The NEP will operate as a one-year pilot program during which OSHA will conduct planned inspections of chemical facilities.

Which Chemical Facilities Will Be Reviewed? 

The Chemical NEP will focus on facilities in the following regions:

  • Regions I: Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, and Vermont
  • Region VII: Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, and Nebraska; and
  • Region X: Alaska, Washington, Oregon, and Idaho

The facilities selected for planned inspections will be a sub-set of the following:

  • OSHA PSM facilities that are covered by EPA’s Risk Management Program (RMP) as Tier 3 sites;
  • Explosive manufacturers; and
  • Facilities that have been previously cited for PSM violations (IMIS Database or based on area office knowledge )

The master list of facilities created using the above criteria will be sub-divided into three categories:

  • Facilities likely to have ammonia used for refrigeration as the only Highly Hazardous Chemical (HHC)
  • Facilities likely to have chlorine used for water treatment as the only HHC; and
  • Facilities likely to have both ammonia and chlorine, ammonia or chlorine used for other than refrigeration or water treatment, or HHCs other than ammonia or chlorine.

What Does OSHA Chemical NEP Inspection Involve?

OSHA Chemical NEP inspections will be staffed by at least one “Level 1” qualified Compliance and Safety Health Officer (CSHO).  Each inspection is expected to have one week of on-site data gathering stage followed by 6-8 weeks of review. Each on-site inspection will begin with a kick-off conference. During the initial meetings, CSHO will ask management representatives to provide an overview of the process, worst case catastrophic scenarios and controls in place to prevent them.

Documents Requested

Following is a list of documents that will be requested at the beginning of the inspection:

  • All contract employee injury and illness logs as required by 1910.119(h)(2)(vi)
  • List of all PSM-covered process/units in the complex
  • A list of all units and the maximum intended inventories of all chemicals (in pounds) in each of the listed units
  • A summary description of the facility’s PSM program
  • Unit process flow diagrams
  • Piping and instrumentation diagrams (P&IDs) including legends
  • Unit Plot plans
  • Unit Electrical classification diagrams
  • Process narrative descriptions
  • Descriptions of safety systems (e.g. interlocks, detection or suppression systems)
  • Design codes and standards employed for process/equipment in the Selected Unit (s)
  • A list of all employees (i.e., hourly and supervisory) presently involved in operating the Selected Units(s) including names, job titles, work shifts, start date in the unit, and the name of the person(s) to whom they report (their supervisor)
  • The initial process hazard analysis(PHA) and the most recent “update/”redo” or revalidation for the Selected Unit (s); this includes PHA reports, PHA worksheets, actions to address findings and recommendations promptly, written schedules for actions to be completed, and documentation of findings and recommendations.

Dynamic Questions – Who is the Weakest Link?

To conduct inspection OSHA will create a dynamic list of questions – these questions will not be disclosed publicly and will be changed periodically.The dynamic list of questions will be created in five broad categories:

  1. PSM General (applicable to all processes)
  2. Ammonia Refrigeration
  3. Water and/or wastewater treatment
  4. Storage
  5. Chemical processing

During each inspection approximately 15 questions will be drawn from the applicable dynamic list for each evaluation of a selected unit – ten questions from the applicable chemical process dynamic list and five questions from the PSM general dynamic list.

For further details, read the notice from OSHA – PSM Covered Chemical Facilities National Emphasis Program

Filed Under: Articles, on Risk & Safety, Operational Risk Process Safety

About Sanjeev Saraf

Reduce risks, Increase Uptime, Reduce costs

I did my first litigation support work in 2000.

Since then I have been obsessed with preventing future failures. Some of these failures can have catastrophic consequences.

Having tried various techniques, learning / unlearning “latest” paradigms, it is clear we have a long way to go!

But instead of thoughtful work, what I mostly see are platitudes and oversimplifications. No keen practical insights!

I want to change that.

« So how Should I use the SAP-PM Breakdown Indicator?
Are your Asset Management efforts worth your TIME? »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Photo of Sanjeev SarafArticles by Sanjeev Saraf
in the Operational Risk, Process Safety article series

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Posts

  • Gremlins today
  • The Power of Vision in Leadership and Organizational Success
  • 3 Types of MTBF Stories
  • ALT: An in Depth Description
  • Project Email Economics

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy