Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
    • About Us
    • Colophon
    • Survey
  • Reliability.fm
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • NoMTBF
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • ASQR&R
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Maintenance Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • RCM Blitz®
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Field Reliability Data Analysis
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability by Design
      • Reliability Competence
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
      • Reliability Knowledge
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Institute of Quality & Reliability
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Statistical Methods for Failure-Time Data
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Glossary
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinar Sources
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • Your Courses
    • Live Courses
      • Introduction to Reliability Engineering & Accelerated Testings Course Landing Page
      • Advanced Accelerated Testing Course Landing Page
    • Integral Concepts Courses
      • Reliability Analysis Methods Course Landing Page
      • Applied Reliability Analysis Course Landing Page
      • Statistics, Hypothesis Testing, & Regression Modeling Course Landing Page
      • Measurement System Assessment Course Landing Page
      • SPC & Process Capability Course Landing Page
      • Design of Experiments Course Landing Page
    • The Manufacturing Academy Courses
      • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Statistics
      • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
      • Quality Engineering Statistics
      • FMEA in Practice
      • Process Capability Analysis course
      • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
      • Return on Investment online course
    • Industrial Metallurgist Courses
    • FMEA courses Powered by The Luminous Group
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • How to be an Online Student
    • Quondam Courses
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home
  • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction Course Landing Page
  • Upcoming Live Events
You are here: Home / Articles / OC Curve with Hypergeometric Method

by Fred Schenkelberg Leave a Comment

OC Curve with Hypergeometric Method

OC Curve with Hypergeometric Method

The operating characteristic curve is used to understand lot sampling plan. It graphically provides a relationship between the unknown lot’s defect rate (or total) and the probability of the specific sampling plan to accept the lot. Very good plans discriminate between good and bad lots. Poor plans may accept bad lots or reject good lots to easily.

There are three methods to calculate the values of the OC curve, and in this short note we will use the hypergeometric distribution and consider the lot effect of changing the sample size drawn from the lot.

The hypergeometric distribution is described here.

In this example we have 500 units per lot and using the ANSI/ASQ Z1.4-2008 Sampling Procedures and Tables for Inspection by Attributes S-3 inspection level and single sampling plan, we draw eight samples. The acceptance is with no defects in the sample, r=0. The rejection of the lot is with one defect or more in the sample, c=1.

If I have the capability to draw five more samples for a total of 13, how would that change the ability of the sampling plan to accept lots with better than 1.5% defect rate and reject those with higher defect rates?

This plot is for 8 and 13 samples drawn from a lot of 500. The top curve is eight samples, and the lower curve is for 13 samples. For a lot with 1.5% defects the Pa=80.9% down from 87.8% with eight samples. Almost 7 points are more likely to find a defect in the sample and reject the lot. Y-axis is Probability of Accepting the Lot, x-axis is lot percent defective.

x5

If the lot has 10% of units defective, the 13 samples are about 25% likely to accept the lot, whereas the 8 sample draw is roughly 45% likely to accept. Of course, more samples provides more information about the unknown characteristics of the lot. It always is a balance between cost of sampling and testing a lot and the expense of accepting a lot with some unacceptable number of defects. The OC curve provides one way to understanding and makes the final decision about a sampling plan.

Back to the calculation for a moment, above we calculated the probability of accepting the lot, Pa when the lot defect rate is 1.5%. Here is the formula and calculation.

$$ \large\displaystyle P(x,N,n,m)=\frac{\left( \begin{array}{l}m\\x\end{array} \right)\left( \begin{array}{l}N-m\\n-x\end{array} \right)}{\left( \begin{array}{l}N\\n\end{array} \right)}$$

This calculates the probability of exactly x successes in a sample of n taken from a population of N which contains m successes. For this problem we are defining the test failure as a success and we’re interested in the chance that a sample of 8, n, taken from the lot of 500, N, which has an expected total number of ‘successes’ of 7.5 (use integers in the formula, 8 in this case), m, would result in exactly 0, x, ‘successes’.

$$ \large\displaystyle P(0,500,8,8)=\frac{\left( \begin{array}{l}8\\0\end{array} \right)\left( \begin{array}{l}500-8\\8-0\end{array} \right)}{\left( \begin{array}{l}500\\8\end{array} \right)}=0.875$$

The calculation results in a probability of having exactly 0 ‘successes’ is 0.875.

And, repeat the same calculation for a sample of 13 from the same lot to find Pa=80.9.

To create the curves, repeat the calculations for each point along the x-axis which is the lot percent defective. For the formula, we need to calculate the number of good and bad items in the lot, which should not be too difficult.


Related:

OC Curve with Binomial Method (article)

How to read an OC curve (article)

Sequential Sampling by Attributes (article)

 

Filed Under: Articles, CRE Preparation Notes, Reliability Testing Tagged With: Acceptance sampling, Hypergeometric distribution

About Fred Schenkelberg

I am the reliability expert at FMS Reliability, a reliability engineering and management consulting firm I founded in 2004. I left Hewlett Packard (HP)’s Reliability Team, where I helped create a culture of reliability across the corporation, to assist other organizations.

« Z Value
Reliability with Confidence »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

CRE Preparation Notes

Article by Fred Schenkelberg

Join Accendo

Join our members-only community for full access to exclusive eBooks, webinars, training, and more.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Get Full Site Access

Not ready to join?
Stay current on new articles, podcasts, webinars, courses and more added to the Accendo Reliability website each week.
No membership required to subscribe.

[popup type="" link_text="Get Weekly Email Updates" link_class="button" ][display_form id=266][/popup]

  • CRE Preparation Notes
  • CRE Prep
  • Reliability Management
  • Probability and Statistics for Reliability
  • Reliability in Design and Development
  • Reliability Modeling and Predictions
  • Reliability Testing
  • Maintainability and Availability
  • Data Collection and Use

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy