Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
    • About Us
    • Colophon
    • Survey
  • Reliability.fm
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • NoMTBF
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • ASQR&R
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Maintenance Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • RCM Blitz®
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Field Reliability Data Analysis
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability by Design
      • Reliability Competence
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
      • Reliability Knowledge
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Institute of Quality & Reliability
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Statistical Methods for Failure-Time Data
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Glossary
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinar Sources
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • Your Courses
    • Live Courses
      • Introduction to Reliability Engineering & Accelerated Testings Course Landing Page
      • Advanced Accelerated Testing Course Landing Page
    • Integral Concepts Courses
      • Reliability Analysis Methods Course Landing Page
      • Applied Reliability Analysis Course Landing Page
      • Statistics, Hypothesis Testing, & Regression Modeling Course Landing Page
      • Measurement System Assessment Course Landing Page
      • SPC & Process Capability Course Landing Page
      • Design of Experiments Course Landing Page
    • The Manufacturing Academy Courses
      • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Statistics
      • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
      • Quality Engineering Statistics
      • FMEA in Practice
      • Process Capability Analysis course
      • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
      • Return on Investment online course
    • Industrial Metallurgist Courses
    • FMEA courses Powered by The Luminous Group
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • How to be an Online Student
    • Quondam Courses
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home
  • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction Course Landing Page
  • Upcoming Live Events
You are here: Home / Articles / OC Curve with Binomial Method

by Fred Schenkelberg 3 Comments

OC Curve with Binomial Method

OC Curve with Binomial Method

The operating characteristic curve is useful to understand the capability of a lot sampling plan. It depicts a graphical relationship between the unknown lot’s defect rate and the probability of the specific sampling plan to accept the lot. Ideally, we want a sampling plan the correctly accepts good lots and rejects bad lots.

There are three methods to calculate the probability of acceptance: Hypergeometric, binomial and Poisson distribution methods. In this article let’s consider a lot size that is very large compared to the inspection sample, such that removing the sample does not materially change the ratio of bad items to good.

The binomial distribution is described here. It is a useful distribution to determine probability of selecting some number of defects given a probability of selecting a defect with each item drawn. We can use the probability density function, PDF, to calculate the probability of observing exactly d defects in a sample of n items drawn from a population with p fraction of defective items per lot.

$$ \large\displaystyle {{P}_{d}}=f\left( d \right)=\frac{n!}{d!\left( n-d \right)!}{{p}^{d}}{{\left( 1-p \right)}^{n-d}}$$

The probability of acceptance is the probability that d, the number of defects is less than or equal to c, the accept number in the lot sampling plan. The binomial cumulative density function is just the sum of PDF probability from zero to c.

$$ \large\displaystyle {{P}_{a}}=P\left( d\le c \right)=\sum\limits_{d=0}^{c}{\frac{n!}{d!\left( n-d \right)!}{{p}^{d}}{{\left( 1-p \right)}^{n-d}}}$$

A lot sample example

Let’s say we have lot’s of 500 units and we’re are considering using the ANSI/ASQ Z1.4 – 2008 Sampling Procedures and Tables for Inspection by Attributes S-3 inspection level and single sampling plan. It directs us to select 8 samples from each lot. The acceptance is with no defects in the sample, c=0 and reject the lot is there is one defect in the sample.

We calculate Pa for a range of lot defect rates (recall it is unknown) to create the OC curve. Let’s determine the probability of acceptance for a lot that has 5%, p = 0.05, defects. With an accept number of zero, the sum doesn’t apply as we’re only considering the chance that the sample will have all acceptable units.

$$ \large\displaystyle {{P}_{a}}=P\left( d\le 0 \right)=\sum\limits_{d=0}^{0}{\frac{8!}{0!\left( 8-0 \right)!}{{.05}^{0}}{{\left( 1-.05 \right)}^{8-0}}=}0.663$$

Looking closely, when the sampling plan has an accept number of zero the binomial CDF reduces to just the probability of drawing a good unit raised to the number of samples drawn, n.

We repeat the calculation over the range of unknown lot defect rates, p, of interest and then plot the OC curve.

BinomialOCcurve

Conclusions

With any sampling plan, it depends on what defect rate we are willing to accept. In a perfect world, all items in a lot will be fine. In reality, we expect some small fraction to have defects. In the case above, if the lot actually arrives with a 10% defect rate, the sampling plan would accept the lot about 45% of the time. To me, that isn’t very good, yet may be fine for your situation.

Be sure to consider the cost of your product’s failure due to a faulty component and the cost of either purchasing a lower defect rate source of parts or increasing lot inspection to minimize bad parts getting into your product. It is always a tradeoff, yet can be a useful tool to improve the reliability of your products.


Related:

OC Curve with Hypergeometric Method (article)

How to read an OC curve (article)

Sequential Sampling by Attributes (article)

 

Filed Under: Articles, CRE Preparation Notes, Reliability Testing Tagged With: Statistics distributions and functions

About Fred Schenkelberg

I am the reliability expert at FMS Reliability, a reliability engineering and management consulting firm I founded in 2004. I left Hewlett Packard (HP)’s Reliability Team, where I helped create a culture of reliability across the corporation, to assist other organizations.

« The True Importance of Reliability Block Diagrams
Reliability Engineering is More Than Tools »

Comments

  1. Gary Howard says

    November 19, 2019 at 10:11 AM

    I know very little about this but I am attempting to deploy a tool for displaying these results (only using provided math). I am told over and over that the binomial distribution is not the right approach in determining an OC curve for continuous data — only for pass fail data. I have been looking at one web site after another and I can not find anything that specifically addresses an OC curve for continuous data. Any comments?

    Reply
    • Fred Schenkelberg says

      November 20, 2019 at 1:24 PM

      Hi Gary,

      The gist of an OC curve to typically based on a judgement or conclusion that something or a batch of something is either good or not according to some criteria – independent of what kind of data – continuous or not. The set of results are pass/fail based at the end of the day.

      And other than with binomial, you can also use the hypergeometric to calculate the curve https://fred-schenkelberg-project.prev01.rmkr.net/oc-curve-with-hypergeometric-method/

      Cheers,

      Fred

      Reply
  2. John DeBeer says

    December 16, 2020 at 9:44 AM

    Thanks Fred, very clear, very helpful. I had not seen the calculation laid out that way before.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

CRE Preparation Notes

Article by Fred Schenkelberg

Join Accendo

Join our members-only community for full access to exclusive eBooks, webinars, training, and more.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Get Full Site Access

Not ready to join?
Stay current on new articles, podcasts, webinars, courses and more added to the Accendo Reliability website each week.
No membership required to subscribe.

[popup type="" link_text="Get Weekly Email Updates" link_class="button" ][display_form id=266][/popup]

  • CRE Preparation Notes
  • CRE Prep
  • Reliability Management
  • Probability and Statistics for Reliability
  • Reliability in Design and Development
  • Reliability Modeling and Predictions
  • Reliability Testing
  • Maintainability and Availability
  • Data Collection and Use

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy