Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
    • About Us
    • Colophon
    • Survey
  • Reliability.fm
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • NoMTBF
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • ASQR&R
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Maintenance Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • RCM Blitz®
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Field Reliability Data Analysis
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability by Design
      • Reliability Competence
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
      • Reliability Knowledge
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Institute of Quality & Reliability
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Statistical Methods for Failure-Time Data
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Glossary
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinar Sources
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • Your Courses
    • Live Courses
      • Introduction to Reliability Engineering & Accelerated Testings Course Landing Page
      • Advanced Accelerated Testing Course Landing Page
    • Integral Concepts Courses
      • Reliability Analysis Methods Course Landing Page
      • Applied Reliability Analysis Course Landing Page
      • Statistics, Hypothesis Testing, & Regression Modeling Course Landing Page
      • Measurement System Assessment Course Landing Page
      • SPC & Process Capability Course Landing Page
      • Design of Experiments Course Landing Page
    • The Manufacturing Academy Courses
      • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Statistics
      • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
      • Quality Engineering Statistics
      • FMEA in Practice
      • Process Capability Analysis course
      • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
      • Return on Investment online course
    • Industrial Metallurgist Courses
    • FMEA courses Powered by The Luminous Group
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • How to be an Online Student
    • Quondam Courses
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home
  • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction Course Landing Page
  • Upcoming Live Events
You are here: Home / Articles / on Maintenance Reliability / Aasan Asset Management / New Technologies but Old Operating Context

by Usman Syed 1 Comment

New Technologies but Old Operating Context

New Technologies but Old Operating Context

With the growing trend of Internet of Things (IoT), Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Data Science in Industrial Asset Management domain; I just wonder whether the Plant Engineers will still be keeping tab on the ‘Operating Context’ of their assets to extract real value from these revolutionary technologies or will just rush like lemmings to adopt them.

This reminds me of the following anecdote narrated by a Software Engineer working for the NASA.

Requirement: Print out all errors messages.

Requirement: Output an error message when the printer is out of paper.

Result: First message printed when paper was loaded. “The printer is out of paper.”

Despite the innovative technological advances there is still a huge question remained to answer. Why in most cases, innovation fails? The answer lies in lack of sustainable business value of these innovations. And business value is very much driven by the operating context of the organization. If there is a lack of understanding on that part, you will miss the business value.

Any technology adopted without giving due consideration to the operating context of an organization and its assets will not yield results. This requires that:

  • business needs are well understood by everyone involved
  • the fundamentals of operations, maintenance and reliability should take precedence over technology

Technology should only be treated as means for extracting value out of the assets. It should be the one serving our assets. Not the other way round. This increases the significance of Plant Engineer’s expertise, skills and experience. They are the ones who should be driving the efforts for innovation and coming up with applicable use cases of the technology within their operating context.

Make the technology fit to your operating context. It is and should be by nature, tailor-made. This also requires organizations to be persistent and patient in their efforts. Treat innovation as a journey and hold a long-term vision towards the intended goals.

For the technology businesses, there are important lessons to be learnt as well. In order to succeed in the b2b markets, technology companies should always listen to their Clients and the Subject Matter Experts within the specific industries and areas of operation.

Filed Under: Aasan Asset Management, Articles, on Maintenance Reliability

About Usman Syed

Usman is an Asset Management professional with Electrical & Instrumentation Engineering background. With over 15 years of experience mainly within Oil/Gas, Power and Manufacturing sectors, he has worked and consulted with multiple global organizations.

« Adaptive, Antifragile, Resilient, Or Just Trying to Be Compliant
Sharpen Learning »

Comments

  1. Muhammed Sajid Saeed Quadri says

    November 7, 2019 at 3:53 AM

    Very good article.. yes, new technologies need to be shaped to cater specific needs to add value and smoothness in operation to be more precise & productive.. to make systems lean and easily handled by different level of intellect.. keep the thought process sharing Usman Mustafa.. it is always worth reading to your articles.. wish yoj mors highs..

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Articles by Usman Mustafa Syed
in the Aasan Asset Management series

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Posts

  • Gremlins today
  • The Power of Vision in Leadership and Organizational Success
  • 3 Types of MTBF Stories
  • ALT: An in Depth Description
  • Project Email Economics

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy