Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
    • About Us
    • Colophon
    • Survey
  • Reliability.fm
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • NoMTBF
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • ASQR&R
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Maintenance Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • RCM Blitz®
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Field Reliability Data Analysis
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability by Design
      • Reliability Competence
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
      • Reliability Knowledge
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Institute of Quality & Reliability
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Statistical Methods for Failure-Time Data
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Glossary
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinar Sources
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • Your Courses
    • Live Courses
      • Introduction to Reliability Engineering & Accelerated Testings Course Landing Page
      • Advanced Accelerated Testing Course Landing Page
    • Integral Concepts Courses
      • Reliability Analysis Methods Course Landing Page
      • Applied Reliability Analysis Course Landing Page
      • Statistics, Hypothesis Testing, & Regression Modeling Course Landing Page
      • Measurement System Assessment Course Landing Page
      • SPC & Process Capability Course Landing Page
      • Design of Experiments Course Landing Page
    • The Manufacturing Academy Courses
      • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Statistics
      • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
      • Quality Engineering Statistics
      • FMEA in Practice
      • Process Capability Analysis course
      • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
      • Return on Investment online course
    • Industrial Metallurgist Courses
    • FMEA courses Powered by The Luminous Group
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • How to be an Online Student
    • Quondam Courses
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home
  • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction Course Landing Page
  • Upcoming Live Events
You are here: Home / Articles / Net Positive Suction Head Losses

by Mike Sondalini Leave a Comment

Net Positive Suction Head Losses

Net Positive Suction Head Losses

Net positive suction head losses (or why you can suck through a straw).

Pumps cavitate and run dry when the pressure leading into them falls below the vapor pressure of what they are pumping. At vapor pressure, the liquid boils into a vapor and fills the pipe.

In order to know that the pressure to a pump is always above the vapor pressure, it is necessary to calculate that the pressure losses from pipe friction and suction lift will not cause the pressure to drop under the vapor pressure.

The presence of dissolved gas in the liquid complicates the problem. 

Keywords: cavitation, NPSH, net positive suction head required, net positive suction head available, vapor lock

Why you can suck through a straw

When you understand how you suck liquid up a straw you will then have a good understanding of suction lift and its effect on net positive suction head (NPSH).

At the moment all around you is air.

The air has weight because Earth’s gravity is pulling it down. This weight is acting on the outside surfaces of everything.

When you put a straw into a glass of water and suck, you draw the air out of the straw into your mouth. The air that was in the straw has gone and you have created a vacuum inside the straw.

The vacuum you created in the straw is at a lower pressure than the air around you.

But the end of the straw is under the water in the glass.

A difference in pressure will cause flow from the area of high pressure to the area of low pressure.

The inside of the straw is at a lower pressure than the air around you and so the air around you will try to flow to the inside of the straw. But in doing so the air first pushes the water up the straw and into your mouth.

So really you don’t suck water up the straw, but instead, the water is pushed up the straw by the air pressure around you.

All you do is make the vacuum in your mouth and then natural physics principles do the rest.

If instead of a straw we replace it with a pipe, and the vacuum made by your mouth is instead made by a pump.

We now have a situation where the pipe friction losses may be so much, or the end of the pipe is so far below the pump (the suction lift), that the vacuum made by the pump can fall low enough to boil off the liquid before it gets to the pump.

What is NPSH?

The NPSH is the difference between the pressure at the pump suction and the vapor pressure of the liquid.

Provided the NPSH pressure difference is well above the vapor pressure, the liquid will flow to the pump without boiling off and vaporizing (cavitating).

NPSH requires that we know two conditions at the pump suction.

The first is the real pressure at the pump inlet and the second is the liquid’s vapor pressure at the temperature it is when entering the pump.

The pressure difference between the liquid’s vapor pressure and the real pressure at the pump is called the ‘available NPSH’. The pressure lost along the pipe from the suction point into the pipe, through to the inlet to the pump is known as the ‘required NPSH’.

Provided the ‘available NPSH’ is greater than the ‘required NPSH’ the pump will draw the liquid to it and pump it out.

The pressure loss in the suction pipe consists of both friction losses and suction lift losses.

If the pump is located lower than the tank nozzle it is sucking from, and the pressure in the tank is not a vacuum (i.e. below atmosphere pressure), then suction lift is not present and only pipe friction losses need to be calculated.

If the vessel pressure is a vacuum then the amount of vacuum must be considered as an equivalent suction lift.

However, if the pump is located higher than the tank outlet nozzle, then at some point when emptying the tank, the liquid level will go below the top of the pump suction flange and suction lift develops.

The situation of having both pipe pressure friction loss and suction lift is shown in Figure No. 1.

The height of the suction lift needs to be added to the pressure losses along the suction pipe.

V1E4-5-1

 

Figure No 1. Suction lift and pipe friction losses.

The effect of gas entrainment on NPSH.

Where gas is dissolved into the liquid, such as carbon dioxide in beer, or the liquid carries bubbles, such as air bubbles caught in water from cooling towers, the gas will separate from the liquid at pressures much higher than the vapor pressure of the liquid.

When making beer the pressure in the piping system after carbon dioxide injection is intentionally kept above the vaporizing pressure for carbon dioxide to ensure it stays dissolved in the beer and does not vent off.

In the case of the cooling tower pump, the air will come out of the water.

This air needs to be vented off.

The pump can be positioned so that the air can either go back out the suction pipe.

This means that the suction pipe is only partially filled and a larger diameter pipe may be needed to take both the water and air volumes.

Or the air can flow upward to the pump and go out the discharge pipe.

This will cause a suction lift situation. Or a venting tank or standpipe may be needed before the pump to let the air escape.

How to overcome NPSH problems

True NPSH problems only occur when the pressure in the liquid at the pump suction is near or below the vapor pressure at the temperature of the liquid.

You have two options to solve the problem. You can play with either, or both, the pressure and the temperature of the liquid at the pump inlet.

On the pressure side either increase the supply pressure or decrease the pressure losses along the suction pipe.

On the temperature side, you must increase the liquid’s temperature at the pump suction.

Some liquids have extremely high vapor pressures and are difficult to handle but these principles still apply.

One more viable option remains.

It is to change the style of pump. If the pump were also able to safely pump the vapor as well as the liquid, then whenever the pressure fell low enough to create vapor the pump would still move the product.

The flow rates would be greatly reduced but no vapor locking would occur.

Mike Sondalini – Equipment Longevity Engineer

DISCLAIMER: Because the authors, publisher, and resellers do not know the context in which the information presented in the articles is to be used, they accept no responsibility for the consequences of using the information.

[ninja_form id=431]

If you found this interesting, you may like the ebook Centrifugal Pump Problems & Answers.

Filed Under: Articles, on Maintenance Reliability, Plant Maintenance Tagged With: Pumps

About Mike Sondalini

In engineering and maintenance since 1974, Mike’s career extends across original equipment manufacturing, beverage processing and packaging, steel fabrication, chemical processing and manufacturing, quality management, project management, enterprise asset management, plant and equipment maintenance, and maintenance training. His specialty is helping companies build highly effective operational risk management processes, develop enterprise asset management systems for ultra-high reliable assets, and instil the precision maintenance skills needed for world class equipment reliability.

« Are You Playing Asset Roulette?
Teamwork Produces Superior Results »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Article by
Mike Sondalini
in the
Plant Maintenance series.

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Articles

  • Gremlins today
  • The Power of Vision in Leadership and Organizational Success
  • 3 Types of MTBF Stories
  • ALT: An in Depth Description
  • Project Email Economics

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy