Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
    • About Us
    • Colophon
    • Survey
  • Reliability.fm
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • NoMTBF
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • ASQR&R
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Maintenance Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • RCM Blitz®
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Field Reliability Data Analysis
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability by Design
      • Reliability Competence
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
      • Reliability Knowledge
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Institute of Quality & Reliability
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Statistical Methods for Failure-Time Data
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Glossary
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinar Sources
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • Your Courses
    • Live Courses
      • Introduction to Reliability Engineering & Accelerated Testings Course Landing Page
      • Advanced Accelerated Testing Course Landing Page
    • Integral Concepts Courses
      • Reliability Analysis Methods Course Landing Page
      • Applied Reliability Analysis Course Landing Page
      • Statistics, Hypothesis Testing, & Regression Modeling Course Landing Page
      • Measurement System Assessment Course Landing Page
      • SPC & Process Capability Course Landing Page
      • Design of Experiments Course Landing Page
    • The Manufacturing Academy Courses
      • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Statistics
      • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
      • Quality Engineering Statistics
      • FMEA in Practice
      • Process Capability Analysis course
      • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
      • Return on Investment online course
    • Industrial Metallurgist Courses
    • FMEA courses Powered by The Luminous Group
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • How to be an Online Student
    • Quondam Courses
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home
  • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction Course Landing Page
  • Upcoming Live Events
You are here: Home / Articles / When Management Doesn’t Listen

by Fred Schenkelberg 2 Comments

When Management Doesn’t Listen

When Management Doesn’t Listen

A Bloomberg articles details the Takata airbag recall series of events. The line that caught my attention is:

…company documents suggesting that Takata executives discounted concerns from their own employees and hid the potential danger…

“Sixty Million Car Bombs: Inside Takata’s Airbag Crisis”, Susan Berfield, et.al. Bloomberg Business Week, posted June 2nd, 2016, https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2016-06-02/sixty-million-car-bombs-inside-takata-s-air-bag-crisis

There are other examples where management doesn’t seem to listen when engineers raise concerns. Have we cried wolf too often? Has management gotten used to taken risks as a good business practice?

At times reliability risks are real and need to be clearly communicated. Let’s talk about how you can effectively get the message across.

Are You Using the Right Language?

You do not need an MBA to speak to senior managers. It would help though.

The language of business is money. Not probability of failure or engineering risk. It is the impact on earnings per share, or simply money.

Detailing the results of reliability testing by discussing the noted failures, images of failure sites, along with estimates of failure rates does little to convey the magnitude of the issue.

An engineering presentation often talks about the engineering and calculations.

We need to convert our work into dollars. How much will the expected failure rate cost us in warranty or lost sales?

If there is a 10% chance of a $100 million recall, the net present cost is only $10 million, which for some organizations is still a lot of money.

What is Important to Your Management Team?

I’ve found senior managers talk in terms of money.

Not every manager you work with will. Some focus on time to market, other on functionality, and you likely will find managers focused on cost. The priority changes for different industries, products, and situations.

You need to know what is important to the team of managers you work with regularly.

Knowing the financial impact is a great place to start and still useful at any management level, yet you also need to speak a few other languages.

For example, if your product has a critical time to market emphasis, the management team may be acutely aware of the cost per day of delay.

For the inkjet printer project, I once worked on we knew it cost us $1 million per day of delay in lost sales.

Therefore, when discussing the value of HALT you should emphasize the ability to find issues earlier thus reducing the risk of delaying production. Avoiding a one day delay makes the investment in HALT rather worthwhile.

If cost is the primary focus, emphasize the total cost including warranty.

Often the focus is on the bill of material cost and ignores the cost of failures, yet a profit margin will quickly evaporate if the failure rate increases even slightly.

Is the Main Point First and Clear?

You perform ingenious failure analysis to ferret out the primary cause of failures.

The report details the symptoms, customer complaints, the step by step analysis done in the lab, and eventually if at all, gets to the recommendations. While we’re impressed by the SEM images and derivations of thermal transfer equations it’s not the point you are trying to make.

Think executive summary. One page.

Main point, recommendation, total cost and return on investment on one page or less.

Lead off your presentation with the bottom line. Make the key points clear and connected directly to what your management team cares about. Money, time to market, cost, etc.

You are not telling the story. This is not an interesting detective story or thriller where the forensic team cracks the case. Well, it often is, yet your team most likely isn’t all the interested in the drama involved with finding the answers.

Lead with the recommendation, key findings along with their impact (money). Let the rest of the discussion follow the questions you receive.

You may be able to tell the story, yet do not let the story obscure your primary recommendation or finding.

Help Your Teams Listen and Understand

In summary, do your homework and determine what is important to your audience.

Focus your presentation or report first on what is important to your management team. In most cases, this means lead with the impact on the bottom line.

You still need to do solid engineering. You still need to check your assumptions. You still need the supporting research. Yet, that is all backup to the primary point that your presentation or report has to convey.

Do not make your team work to get the message. Spell it out clearly and quickly.

What have you found effective when talking to your management team? How do you prepare and communicate bad news (or good)?

Leave a comment and share with your peers.

Filed Under: Articles, Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics, on Product Reliability

About Fred Schenkelberg

I am the reliability expert at FMS Reliability, a reliability engineering and management consulting firm I founded in 2004. I left Hewlett Packard (HP)’s Reliability Team, where I helped create a culture of reliability across the corporation, to assist other organizations.

« RCM Leaders and Followers
Introduction to Design for Reliability »

Comments

  1. Samuel Lee says

    February 7, 2017 at 12:30 PM

    Great point on using the right language. Everyone speaks the language of money! Quality/Reliability engineers should utilize this as we’re seen more of a “support” role and visibility to senior/exec management is only during times of fire drills or catastrophic field failures that need to be contained. Profit = Revenue – Cost. The sexy and glamorous part of that equation is the revenue but just as important is the reduction of cost. Now that customers are informed buyers by checking reviews and researching prior to their purchase I will say the perception of poor quality will make or break companies in the longer term.

    Reply
    • Fred Schenkelberg says

      February 7, 2017 at 1:29 PM

      Hi Samuel, thanks for the comment. The hard part about cost is many organizations do not estimate or expect the many aspects of cost of failures (cost of unquality or unreliability). cheers, Fred

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Article by Fred Schenkelberg
in the Musings series

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Articles

  • Gremlins today
  • The Power of Vision in Leadership and Organizational Success
  • 3 Types of MTBF Stories
  • ALT: An in Depth Description
  • Project Email Economics

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy