Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
    • About Us
    • Colophon
    • Survey
  • Reliability.fm
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • NoMTBF
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • ASQR&R
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Maintenance Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • RCM Blitz®
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Field Reliability Data Analysis
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability by Design
      • Reliability Competence
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
      • Reliability Knowledge
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Institute of Quality & Reliability
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Statistical Methods for Failure-Time Data
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Glossary
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinar Sources
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • Your Courses
    • Live Courses
      • Introduction to Reliability Engineering & Accelerated Testings Course Landing Page
      • Advanced Accelerated Testing Course Landing Page
    • Integral Concepts Courses
      • Reliability Analysis Methods Course Landing Page
      • Applied Reliability Analysis Course Landing Page
      • Statistics, Hypothesis Testing, & Regression Modeling Course Landing Page
      • Measurement System Assessment Course Landing Page
      • SPC & Process Capability Course Landing Page
      • Design of Experiments Course Landing Page
    • The Manufacturing Academy Courses
      • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Statistics
      • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
      • Quality Engineering Statistics
      • FMEA in Practice
      • Process Capability Analysis course
      • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
      • Return on Investment online course
    • Industrial Metallurgist Courses
    • FMEA courses Powered by The Luminous Group
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • How to be an Online Student
    • Quondam Courses
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home
  • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction Course Landing Page
  • Upcoming Live Events
You are here: Home / Articles / Last Job Syndrome, The Risks of Project Past

by Greg Hutchins Leave a Comment

Last Job Syndrome, The Risks of Project Past

Last Job Syndrome, The Risks of Project Past

Guest Post by Malcolm Peart (first posted on CERM ® RISK INSIGHTS – reposted here with permission)

We all use our work experience to a greater or lesser extent and often the most recent project is recalled as it is at the forefront of our minds.  However, is it the most relevant if we try to adapt our most recent, and hopefully successful, experience to meet the current situation?

The Challenge

The direct application of the last job processes, procedures, and methods to the current job, whether rightly or wrongly, is ‘Last Job Syndrome and ‘Sufferers’ of this syndrome blindly follow their last project despite the uniqueness of the new project and try to adapt the situation to meet their experience.  They must go through a new learning curve which can obviate the potential Return on Experience of engaging the ‘experienced’ person.

Conversations inevitably start with “when we were on…” such and such a project and a document is produced or an anecdote is recounted which may or may not be relevant.  This, in turn, opens up the door for other battle-hardened hacks who then pull up a sandbag, swing the lights and swap war stories.  These are possibly even less related to the issue at hand and the actual situation/issue is evaded.  However, and importantly for the application of Last Job Syndrome, the situation is redefined to suit previous project’s experience and we have prevarication as we try to fit a square peg into the round hole.  The anecdotes potentially avoid the issue at hand allowing inappropriate experience to be applied.

If the application of Last Job Syndrome does not resolve the problem another solution has to be found.  This will then need to be based upon real life and the situation in hand and application of ‘relevant’ experience.  A relevant solution is then found but we have had procrastination.

However, if the solution does not work the Last Job Syndrome guy will provide another anecdote of “when we” did this or that and pontification becomes the order of the day.  The risk of a downward spiral of delay in finally arriving at a solution manifests itself.

Response

So how do we avoid such a downward spiral?  There must be a realisation from the outset that while experience is essential it should be tailored to suit the actual situation and the requirements of the job (project) in hand.  This may require an early attitude readjustment for the Last Job Syndrome sufferer or the resultant behaviour will result in delays, and possibly wrong decisions.  These decisions may deal with the consequences but may not address the cause.

To prevent Last Job Syndrome the project manager must cultivate an attitude of building up the project knowledge based on the project in hand, the stage which the project is at, and the relevant team experience.  This should cultivate a behaviour related to the application of relevant experience and looking at issues with a project-centric focus resulting in positive consequences for the project.

Of course, war stories and Last Jobs are useful as they often contain some pearl(s) of wisdom.  But…direct application of such pearls without thought may well be wrong; even though they are applied with the best intent.  Caveat Emptor.

Bio:

MBA, MSc DIC, BSc; Chartered Engineer, Chartered Geologist, PMP

Over thirty years’ experience on large multidisciplinary infrastructure projects including rail, metro systems, airports, roads, marine works and reclamation, hydropower, tunnels and underground excavations.

Project management; design & construction management; and contract administrative in all project phases from feasibility, planning & design, procurement, implementation, execution and completion on Engineer’s Design and Design & Build schemes.

Filed Under: Articles, CERM® Risk Insights, on Risk & Safety

About Greg Hutchins

Greg Hutchins PE CERM is the evangelist of Future of Quality: Risk®. He has been involved in quality since 1985 when he set up the first quality program in North America based on Mil Q 9858 for the natural gas industry. Mil Q became ISO 9001 in 1987

He is the author of more than 30 books. ISO 31000: ERM is the best-selling and highest-rated ISO risk book on Amazon (4.8 stars). Value Added Auditing (4th edition) is the first ISO risk-based auditing book.

« Plant compressed air waste control
Making Asset Management Work »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

CERM® Risk Insights series Article by Greg Hutchins, Editor and noted guest authors

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Articles

  • Gremlins today
  • The Power of Vision in Leadership and Organizational Success
  • 3 Types of MTBF Stories
  • ALT: An in Depth Description
  • Project Email Economics

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy