Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
    • About Us
    • Colophon
    • Survey
  • Reliability.fm
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • NoMTBF
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • ASQR&R
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Maintenance Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • RCM Blitz®
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Field Reliability Data Analysis
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability by Design
      • Reliability Competence
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
      • Reliability Knowledge
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Institute of Quality & Reliability
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Statistical Methods for Failure-Time Data
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Glossary
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinar Sources
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • Your Courses
    • Live Courses
      • Introduction to Reliability Engineering & Accelerated Testings Course Landing Page
      • Advanced Accelerated Testing Course Landing Page
    • Integral Concepts Courses
      • Reliability Analysis Methods Course Landing Page
      • Applied Reliability Analysis Course Landing Page
      • Statistics, Hypothesis Testing, & Regression Modeling Course Landing Page
      • Measurement System Assessment Course Landing Page
      • SPC & Process Capability Course Landing Page
      • Design of Experiments Course Landing Page
    • The Manufacturing Academy Courses
      • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Statistics
      • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
      • Quality Engineering Statistics
      • FMEA in Practice
      • Process Capability Analysis course
      • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
      • Return on Investment online course
    • Industrial Metallurgist Courses
    • FMEA courses Powered by The Luminous Group
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • How to be an Online Student
    • Quondam Courses
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home
  • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction Course Landing Page
  • Upcoming Live Events
You are here: Home / Articles / Key Teaching Principle # 8: Pace of Teaching

by Carl S. Carlson 2 Comments

Key Teaching Principle # 8: Pace of Teaching

As covered in the first article in this series, Principles of Effective Teaching, reliability engineers, FMEA team leaders, and other quality and reliability professionals are often called upon to teach the principles of reliability or FMEA. Whether you are a student who wants to enhance your learning experience, an instructor who wants to improve teaching results, or an engineer who wishes to convey knowledge to another person, this series will offer practical knowledge and advice.

Manage pace of teaching to optimize learning

“The way we spend our time defines who we are.”  Jonathan Estrin

What is “Pace of Teaching”?

“Pace” is defined as “rate of performance or delivery.” Pace of teaching is the rate that you deliver the course material to students.

Have you ever been in a class that does not manage time well? Some instructors speak too slowly and bore their students. Some speak too fast and students have trouble keeping up. Some allow endless topics that consume valuable time. The pace of teaching is a key factor in the transfer of knowledge.

What factors influence the optimum rate of teaching?

Instructors that teach too slowly or too fast risk not conveying the course material to the students. There is no perfect rate (slides per minute) for all students or in all circumstances.

Here are a few of the elements that influence the optimum pace of teaching.

  • Skill and ability of the teacher to convey material
  • Capability of the students to grasp concepts
  • Degree of complexity of the course material
  • Level of student-teacher interactivity
  • Individual student language comprehension

The instructor should keep the class moving efficiently through the course material at as close to an optimum teaching pace as possible, without skimping on fundamentals. By “optimum teaching pace,” I mean the pace of teaching that is not too slow or too fast, that reaches the majority of students with the best possible learning comprehension.

Preparation

I use the following steps for each and every course that I teach.

  1. Before the course starts, I practice teach each slide or page as if actually teaching it to a full classroom, and record the amount of time for each slide or page.
  2. I include time entries for exercises, questions, and breaks, and add up the total time to see how it fits with planning.
  3. If the total time exceeds planned course time, I remove content or extend the course time to fit the total available time.
  4. Above all, I do not try to fit too much content into too little time, and do not cut out exercises or time for questions. I would rather teach less content really well than teach too much content for the allotted time.
  5. Once I have an analysis of the time for each course slide, including time for questions, exercises and breaks, I print out a summary sheet so I can compare progress in real teaching time.
  6. Lastly, I practice teaching the course material until I am very comfortable with the content and pace.

How much course time should be allocated for the instructor to present course material to students, compared to how much time should be allocated for student exercises and questions? My guideline is 40/60: 40% of total course time is the instructor presenting course material to students, and 60% of total course time is allocated for student exercises and questions.

I do these exact preparation steps for every new course, or course modification. It is an essential process and should not be missed.

Three pacing mistakes

Pace of course too slow

Result: students lose interest, and their minds wander to other things.

If you teach too slowly, students will tend to be distracted or have difficulty paying attention. You should pick up the pace of your delivery. You have to keep the attention of students. You should talk less, increase student interaction and focus on key principles.

Pace of course too fast

Result: students are not able to grasp key concepts.

Instructors who teach too fast will overwhelm most students with too much information. Most courses build on the knowledge from one concept to the next. If students do not grasp a concept, they will have trouble with the next concept. You need to slow down and ensure students are getting each concept you teach.

Instructor rushes to finish course

Result: the pace of course is too fast for the portion of the class material that is rushed. This has the same result as “pace of course too fast.”

Tip: Ask for periodic feedback from students, to see if you are teaching at the right pace.

What to do if you are running long?

When teaching, if you find yourself running behind schedule, you can consider strategies to catch up, such as the following: start course earlier, extend course hours, shorten lunch break, or remove non-essential modules. Do not talk faster, reduce time for questions and answers, or in any way jeopardize transfer of knowledge of fundamentals.

Fundamentals

Always take as much time as needed to ensure students understand fundamentals. If you need to remove content, do not remove anything that is needed to teach fundamental principles.

Unique circumstances

The following are a few unique circumstances when adjusting and optimizing your pace of teaching.

  1. Learning variation. Every class has variation in student learning capabilities. Your object time should be  to reach most of your students. If you have one or two very slow learners, you may need to meet with them during lunch or after class to ensure comprehension.
  2. Special topics. In order to avoid spending class time on special topics that only a few of the students want to explore, you can present or discuss the special topic outside of class time.
  3. Parking lot. When a student brings up an off-topic issue or takes a long time to discuss their topic, you can use a Parking Lot strategy. Keep a list of topics that are not part of the course agenda on this list, and find a time outside of course time to take them up. This way, valuable course time is not diluted.

Student questions

As covered in my article “Key Teaching Principle # 4: Questioning,” in addition to always answering student questions, the instructor should frequently ask questions of students. Challenging students to respond to thought-provoking questions is an important part of the learning process.

Summary

Maintaining the right pace of teaching, not too fast or too slow, can enhance learning and help ensure each student understands the concepts and principles of the course.

[display_form id=415]

Filed Under: Articles, Inside FMEA Tagged With: teaching

About Carl S. Carlson

Carl S. Carlson is a consultant and instructor in the areas of FMEA, reliability program planning and other reliability engineering disciplines, supporting over one hundred clients from a wide cross-section of industries. He has 35 years of experience in reliability testing, engineering, and management positions, including senior consultant with ReliaSoft Corporation, and senior manager for the Advanced Reliability Group at General Motors.

« FINESSE Fishbone: The First E Stands For Empathy
Why should I learn about RCM? »

Comments

  1. Nik Sharpe says

    August 4, 2024 at 7:27 PM

    Thanks Carl and I couldnt agree more with this line:

    “I would rather teach less content really well than teach too much content for the allotted time”

    Questions and activities/exercises is where the transfer of knowledge really occurs and no time should be shaved from these areas. A data dump of theory stuff is not beneficial to the classroom learning, and additional reading can be undertaken by each student if they wish and follow up questions asked of yourself (instructor) at a later time. A few tips I have found that helps in this area are:

    – Always ask at the start of the class/course what the students are wanting to get out of the learning. Then you can use this information to tailor your delivery of the course.

    – If you are starting to run out of time, use any downtime from teaching (breaks, before/after class, exercise time, etc) to refine the upcoming course material and hide any slides that arent critical to your lesson plan. You can also use the students wants asked above to gloss over parts of the course that are of no interest and spend some time deeper diving into the sections that are of interest.

    – Lastly, remember the students dont know what is missing. This is their first time seeing the course material and if you need to cut out content to meet your delivery deadline then that is OK. They’ll still get the knowledge transfer they signed up for and you can cover some of the missing stuff in question or exercise time if required.

    Reply
    • Carl S. Carlson says

      August 10, 2024 at 9:43 AM

      Hello Nik.
      Thanks for adding your ideas to the Pace of Teaching conversation. There is so much we can learn from each other, and your suggestions are excellent.
      I especially agree with your comment about starting a class with asking students what they want to achieve from the course. One of my objectives is to make a genuine connection with each student, and allowing them to share their expectations is a good way to ensure their goals are met.
      Carl

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Articles by Carl Carlson
in the Inside FMEA series

[popup type="" link_text="Logo Info" ]

Information about FMEA Icon

Inside FMEA can be visually represented by a large tree, with roots, a solid trunk, branches, and leaves.

- The roots of the tree represent the philosophy and guiding principles for effective FMEAs.
- The solid trunk of the tree represents the fundamentals for all FMEAs.
- The branches represent the various FMEA applications.
- The leaves represent the valuable outcomes of FMEAs.
- This is intended to convey that each of the various FMEA applications have the same fundamentals and philosophical roots.

 

For example, the roots of the tree can represent following philosophy and guiding principles for effective FMEAs, such as:

1. Correct procedure         2. Lessons learned
3. Trained team                 4. Focus on prevention
5. Integrated with DFR    6. Skilled facilitation
7. Management support

The tree trunk represents the fundamentals of FMEA. All types of FMEA share common fundamentals, and these are essential to successful FMEA applications.

The tree branches can include the different types of FMEAs, including:

1. System FMEA         2. Design FMEA
3. Process FMEA        4. DRBFM
5. Hazard Analysis     6. RCM or Maintenance FMEA
7. Software FMEA      8. Other types of FMEA

The leaves of the tree branches represent individual FMEA projects, with a wide variety of FMEA scopes and results. [/popup]

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Posts

  • Gremlins today
  • The Power of Vision in Leadership and Organizational Success
  • 3 Types of MTBF Stories
  • ALT: An in Depth Description
  • Project Email Economics

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy