Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
    • About Us
    • Colophon
    • Survey
  • Reliability.fm
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • NoMTBF
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • ASQR&R
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Maintenance Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • RCM Blitz®
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Field Reliability Data Analysis
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability by Design
      • Reliability Competence
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
      • Reliability Knowledge
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Institute of Quality & Reliability
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Statistical Methods for Failure-Time Data
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Glossary
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinar Sources
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • Your Courses
    • Live Courses
      • Introduction to Reliability Engineering & Accelerated Testings Course Landing Page
      • Advanced Accelerated Testing Course Landing Page
    • Integral Concepts Courses
      • Reliability Analysis Methods Course Landing Page
      • Applied Reliability Analysis Course Landing Page
      • Statistics, Hypothesis Testing, & Regression Modeling Course Landing Page
      • Measurement System Assessment Course Landing Page
      • SPC & Process Capability Course Landing Page
      • Design of Experiments Course Landing Page
    • The Manufacturing Academy Courses
      • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Statistics
      • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
      • Quality Engineering Statistics
      • FMEA in Practice
      • Process Capability Analysis course
      • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
      • Return on Investment online course
    • Industrial Metallurgist Courses
    • FMEA courses Powered by The Luminous Group
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • How to be an Online Student
    • Quondam Courses
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home
  • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction Course Landing Page
  • Upcoming Live Events
You are here: Home / Articles / Key Teaching Principle # 10: Application

by Carl S. Carlson Leave a Comment

Key Teaching Principle # 10: Application

As covered in the first article in this series, Principles of Effective Teaching, reliability engineers, FMEA team leaders, and other quality and reliability professionals are often called upon to teach the principles of reliability or FMEA. Whether you are a student who wants to enhance your learning experience, an instructor who wants to improve teaching results, or an engineer who wishes to convey knowledge to another person, this series will offer practical knowledge and advice.

I have been impressed with the urgency of doing. Knowing is not enough; we must apply. Being willing is not enough; we must do.  Leonardo da Vinci

Key Teaching Principle # 10 compels the instructor to ensure that each and every student learns how to apply the material being taught, in a variety of realistic scenarios.

What is difference between knowing and applying?

To know is “to be aware of through observation, inquiry or information.” To apply is “to bring or put into operation or use.”

Take the example of the term “failure mode” in FMEA. You can learn what is a failure mode by understanding the definition and examples. You can memorize the definition, study examples, inquire by asking questions, and even observe an actual failure mode. All of this provides the basis for learning about failure modes. But it does not guarantee that you can apply the concept of failure mode in an actual FMEA. To be able to apply the concept of failure mode in an FMEA, you have to go beyond knowing about failure modes. You have to gain experience in determining failure modes in real life FMEA applications, including realistic scenarios that can be challenging.

Knowledge of fundamentals precedes application

The prerequisite to application of a subject is a solid understanding of the fundamentals of the subject. This is covered in Key Teaching Principle #1: Understanding. An instructor who has a solid understanding of the fundamentals of the subject can share that knowledge with students. A student’s  ability to apply subject material comes after a thorough understanding of the core principles of the subject.

What teaching techniques help students apply course material?

There are six techniques that I use in every course that I teach, to enhance the ability of students to apply the material they are learning.

1. Definitions. The core terms must be defined well and thoroughly understood. I return to definitions frequently to ensure they are well understood.

2. Principles. The most important principles of the subject must be described and understood by students. Remember that a “principle” is a comprehensive and fundamental law, doctrine or assumption.

3. Examples. The teaching of each principle should be supplemented with realistic examples. These can be examples provided by the instructor, as well as examples identified or developed by the student.

4. Exercises. Students need to practice applying the core principles in planned exercises. The key to successful exercises is to create a safe environment where mistakes can be made and discussed as learning opportunities. I allocate more than 50% of total course time to practice and exercises.

5. Feedback. Students learn best by doing, and receiving meaningful feedback. See article Key Teaching Principle # 9: Constructive Feedback, especially the section “Constructive feedback during exercises.”

6. Questioning. I used to ask periodically in my teaching “do you have any questions?” I’ve since learned that a better way is to periodically ask application questions of students, one by one, so that each student is asked many questions throughout the course. This technique is described in the article Key Teaching Principle # 4: Questioning.

Commitment

As an instructor, I approach every class I teach with a firm commitment that each and every student understands and can apply the material being taught. I believe that success as an instructor is dependent on whether the students grasp the fundamentals and can apply them in realistic scenarios. This is a higher commitment than some courses I’ve attended in the past. I’ve attended courses where the instructor shows up and “teaches” the courses material, irrespective of student comprehension. This is why I emphasize the six techniques described above, and maintain an awareness of how well each student is able to apply the courses material. It is a commitment to go beyond merely communicating course material to students. I try to the best of my ability to ensure that each students walks away with the ability to use and apply the principles of the subject, in their work and life.

Closing comment

It is a personal decision of each instructor, as to the level of commitment to students. There ise great joy in being able to share your knowledge with others, either one-on-one or in front of a class of students. The best results from teaching include the ability to apply the material in the real world.

[display_form id=415]

Filed Under: Articles, Inside FMEA Tagged With: teaching

About Carl S. Carlson

Carl S. Carlson is a consultant and instructor in the areas of FMEA, reliability program planning and other reliability engineering disciplines, supporting over one hundred clients from a wide cross-section of industries. He has 35 years of experience in reliability testing, engineering, and management positions, including senior consultant with ReliaSoft Corporation, and senior manager for the Advanced Reliability Group at General Motors.

« Why Effectively Communicating System Redundancy to Decision Makers Is So Important
SPC Q&A Part 1 »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Articles by Carl Carlson
in the Inside FMEA series

[popup type="" link_text="Logo Info" ]

Information about FMEA Icon

Inside FMEA can be visually represented by a large tree, with roots, a solid trunk, branches, and leaves.

- The roots of the tree represent the philosophy and guiding principles for effective FMEAs.
- The solid trunk of the tree represents the fundamentals for all FMEAs.
- The branches represent the various FMEA applications.
- The leaves represent the valuable outcomes of FMEAs.
- This is intended to convey that each of the various FMEA applications have the same fundamentals and philosophical roots.

 

For example, the roots of the tree can represent following philosophy and guiding principles for effective FMEAs, such as:

1. Correct procedure         2. Lessons learned
3. Trained team                 4. Focus on prevention
5. Integrated with DFR    6. Skilled facilitation
7. Management support

The tree trunk represents the fundamentals of FMEA. All types of FMEA share common fundamentals, and these are essential to successful FMEA applications.

The tree branches can include the different types of FMEAs, including:

1. System FMEA         2. Design FMEA
3. Process FMEA        4. DRBFM
5. Hazard Analysis     6. RCM or Maintenance FMEA
7. Software FMEA      8. Other types of FMEA

The leaves of the tree branches represent individual FMEA projects, with a wide variety of FMEA scopes and results. [/popup]

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Posts

  • Gremlins today
  • The Power of Vision in Leadership and Organizational Success
  • 3 Types of MTBF Stories
  • ALT: An in Depth Description
  • Project Email Economics

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy